Hi
Looks like there might be a slight issue with the reporting of power levels for SFP's in Juniper MX's. Seeing the following: on the Juniper MX:
Laser rx power high alarm threshold : 2.0000 mW / 3.01 dBm Laser rx power low alarm threshold : 0.0000 mW / - Inf dBm Laser rx power high warning threshold : 0.7900 mW / -1.02 dBm Laser rx power low warning threshold : 0.0315 mW / -15.02 dBm
But looks like observium is treating '-Inf' as '0' and this throwing an alert. (see attached)
[cid:image001.png@01D1EC12.14D27B80]
Might need to change how observium interprets Infinite values?
Thanks
Rich This e-mail is sent on behalf of Timico Partner Services Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, registered number 03128506, registered office Beacon Hill Park, Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 2TN and regulated by Ofcom. The information in this e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the use of that individual or entity to which it is addressed. Unauthorised use, dissemination, distribution, publication or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this in error, please notify us by email to privacy@timico.co.ukmailto:privacy@timico.co.uk and delete any copies. For information about how we process data and monitor communications please see our privacy statementhttp://www.timico.co.uk/downloads/terms/Privacy_Statement.pdf.
Oh god. Fuck Juniper.
Sure, returning a random string of letters is an acceptable alternative to a number.
FFFFFFFFFFFFffffffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
adam. On 01/08/2016 10:31:24, Richard Savage richard.savage@timico.co.uk wrote: Hi Looks like there might be a slight issue with the reporting of power levels for SFP’s in Juniper MX’s. Seeing the following: on the Juniper MX: Laser rx power high alarm threshold : 2.0000 mW / 3.01 dBm Laser rx power low alarm threshold : 0.0000 mW / - Inf dBm Laser rx power high warning threshold : 0.7900 mW / -1.02 dBm Laser rx power low warning threshold : 0.0315 mW / -15.02 dBm But looks like observium is treating ‘–Inf’ as ‘0’ and this throwing an alert. (see attached) Might need to change how observium interprets Infinite values? Thanks Rich This e-mail is sent on behalf of Timico Partner Services Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, registered number 03128506, registered office Beacon Hill Park, Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 2TN and regulated by Ofcom. The information in this e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the use of that individual or entity to which it is addressed. Unauthorised use, dissemination, distribution, publication or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this in error, please notify us by email to privacy@timico.co.uk [mailto:privacy@timico.co.uk] and delete any copies. For information about how we process data and monitor communications please see our privacy statement [http://www.timico.co.uk/downloads/terms/Privacy_Statement.pdf].
Hello
Are this power levels graphs supported on Cisco Nexus platform too? We have Nexus 5548 (version 6.0(2)N2(1)) and I can get the SFP laser, temperature and power levels in CLI but these aren’t in the Observium (0.16.5.7900). I saw this power levels graphs in Observium on Cisco 6500 platform but not in Nexus.
This is the output of one of our SFP:
sw3# sh interface ethernet 1/16 transceiver details Ethernet1/16 transceiver is present type is 10Gbase-SR name is CISCO-AVAGO part number is SFBR-709SMZ-CS1 revision is G4.1 serial number is AVD1950A0TM nominal bitrate is 10300 MBit/sec Link length supported for 50/125um OM2 fiber is 82 m Link length supported for 62.5/125um fiber is 26 m Link length supported for 50/125um OM3 fiber is 300 m cisco id is -- cisco extended id number is 4
SFP Detail Diagnostics Information (internal calibration) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current Alarms Warnings Measurement High Low High Low ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Temperature 49.08 C 75.00 C -5.00 C 70.00 C 0.00 C Voltage 3.23 V 3.63 V 2.97 V 3.46 V 3.13 V Current 6.17 mA 10.50 mA 2.50 mA 10.50 mA 2.50 mA Tx Power -2.31 dBm 1.69 dBm -11.30 dBm -1.30 dBm -7.30 dBm Rx Power -3.13 dBm 1.99 dBm -13.97 dBm -1.00 dBm -9.91 dBm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: ++ high-alarm; + high-warning; -- low-alarm; - low-warning
BR Laszlo
From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org Reply-To: Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Date: Monday 1 August 2016 at 17:39 To: "observium@observium.org" observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] power levels for Juniper MX
Oh god. Fuck Juniper.
Sure, returning a random string of letters is an acceptable alternative to a number.
FFFFFFFFFFFFffffffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
adam.
On 01/08/2016 10:31:24, Richard Savage richard.savage@timico.co.uk wrote: Hi
Looks like there might be a slight issue with the reporting of power levels for SFP’s in Juniper MX’s. Seeing the following: on the Juniper MX:
Laser rx power high alarm threshold : 2.0000 mW / 3.01 dBm Laser rx power low alarm threshold : 0.0000 mW / - Inf dBm Laser rx power high warning threshold : 0.7900 mW / -1.02 dBm Laser rx power low warning threshold : 0.0315 mW / -15.02 dBm
But looks like observium is treating ‘–Inf’ as ‘0’ and this throwing an alert. (see attached)
[cid:image001.png@01D1EC12.14D27B80]
Might need to change how observium interprets Infinite values?
Thanks
Rich This e-mail is sent on behalf of Timico Partner Services Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, registered number 03128506, registered office Beacon Hill Park, Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 2TN and regulated by Ofcom. The information in this e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the use of that individual or entity to which it is addressed. Unauthorised use, dissemination, distribution, publication or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this in error, please notify us by email to privacy@timico.co.ukmailto:privacy@timico.co.uk and delete any copies. For information about how we process data and monitor communications please see our privacy statementhttp://www.timico.co.uk/downloads/terms/Privacy_Statement.pdf.
Hi Laszlo,
Cisco have been remarkably bad at implementing sensors and other "useful" information on Nexus platforms. They should be present in the standard Cisco MIBs we already collect. If they're in some special new MIB we've not yet encountered, your best bet would be to ask Cisco about that.
Perhaps On 04/08/2016 06:33:35, Laszlo Nemeth laszlo.nemeth@emarsys.com wrote: Hello Are this power levels graphs supported on Cisco Nexus platform too? We have Nexus 5548 (version 6.0(2)N2(1)) and I can get the SFP laser, temperature and power levels in CLI but these aren’t in the Observium (0.16.5.7900). I saw this power levels graphs in Observium on Cisco 6500 platform but not in Nexus. This is the output of one of our SFP: sw3# sh interface ethernet 1/16 transceiver details Ethernet1/16 transceiver is present type is 10Gbase-SR name is CISCO-AVAGO part number is SFBR-709SMZ-CS1 revision is G4.1 serial number is AVD1950A0TM nominal bitrate is 10300 MBit/sec Link length supported for 50/125um OM2 fiber is 82 m Link length supported for 62.5/125um fiber is 26 m Link length supported for 50/125um OM3 fiber is 300 m cisco id is -- cisco extended id number is 4 SFP Detail Diagnostics Information (internal calibration) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current Alarms Warnings Measurement High Low High Low ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Temperature 49.08 C 75.00 C -5.00 C 70.00 C 0.00 C Voltage 3.23 V 3.63 V 2.97 V 3.46 V 3.13 V Current 6.17 mA 10.50 mA 2.50 mA 10.50 mA 2.50 mA Tx Power -2.31 dBm 1.69 dBm -11.30 dBm -1.30 dBm -7.30 dBm Rx Power -3.13 dBm 1.99 dBm -13.97 dBm -1.00 dBm -9.91 dBm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: ++ high-alarm; + high-warning; -- low-alarm; - low-warning BR Laszlo From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org Reply-To: Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Date: Monday 1 August 2016 at 17:39 To: "observium@observium.org" observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] power levels for Juniper MX Oh god. Fuck Juniper. Sure, returning a random string of letters is an acceptable alternative to a number. FFFFFFFFFFFFffffffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu adam. On 01/08/2016 10:31:24, Richard Savage richard.savage@timico.co.uk wrote: Hi Looks like there might be a slight issue with the reporting of power levels for SFP’s in Juniper MX’s. Seeing the following: on the Juniper MX: Laser rx power high alarm threshold : 2.0000 mW / 3.01 dBm Laser rx power low alarm threshold : 0.0000 mW / - Inf dBm Laser rx power high warning threshold : 0.7900 mW / -1.02 dBm Laser rx power low warning threshold : 0.0315 mW / -15.02 dBm But looks like observium is treating ‘–Inf’ as ‘0’ and this throwing an alert. (see attached) Might need to change how observium interprets Infinite values? Thanks Rich This e-mail is sent on behalf of Timico Partner Services Limited, a company registered in England and Wales, registered number 03128506, registered office Beacon Hill Park, Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 2TN and regulated by Ofcom. The information in this e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for the use of that individual or entity to which it is addressed. Unauthorised use, dissemination, distribution, publication or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this in error, please notify us by email to privacy@timico.co.uk [mailto:privacy@timico.co.uk] and delete any copies. For information about how we process data and monitor communications please see our privacy statement [http://www.timico.co.uk/downloads/terms/Privacy_Statement.pdf].
Teilnehmer (3)
-
Adam Armstrong -
Laszlo Nemeth -
Richard Savage