Aggregate graph show not accurate total max of traffic
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on graph is showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in the same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on graph is showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
I see, this look somehow we can not fix to let Observium fetch data from each port to sum up from the same polling interval so that the total will be accurate.
Can anyone show me the workaround for this?
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael obslist@smarsz.com wrote:
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in the same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom < sophanith.chhom@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on graph is showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
The total is accurate, you just don't understand what the numbers mean.
adam. On 28/02/2017 04:34:29, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: I see, this look somehow we can not fix to let Observium fetch data from each port to sum up from the same polling interval so that the total will be accurate.
Can anyone show me the workaround for this?
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael <obslist@smarsz.com [mailto:obslist@smarsz.com]> wrote:
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in the same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom <sophanith.chhom@gmail.com [mailto:sophanith.chhom@gmail.com]> wrote:
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on graph is showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Can you pls explain me? Since I tried to sum up total for current and average are accurate except total max.
Thanks so much.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
The total is accurate, you just don't understand what the numbers mean.
adam.
On 28/02/2017 04:34:29, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: I see, this look somehow we can not fix to let Observium fetch data from each port to sum up from the same polling interval so that the total will be accurate.
Can anyone show me the workaround for this?
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael obslist@smarsz.com wrote:
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in the same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom < sophanith.chhom@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on graph is showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/ cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
These numbers are accurate. Stare at the graph until you work out why.
adam. On 28/02/2017 04:59:47, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: Can you pls explain me? Since I tried to sum up total for current and average are accurate except total max.
Thanks so much.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org [mailto:adama@memetic.org]> wrote:
The total is accurate, you just don't understand what the numbers mean.
adam. On 28/02/2017 04:34:29, Sophanith Chhom <sophanith.chhom@gmail.com [mailto:sophanith.chhom@gmail.com]> wrote: I see, this look somehow we can not fix to let Observium fetch data from each port to sum up from the same polling interval so that the total will be accurate.
Can anyone show me the workaround for this?
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael <obslist@smarsz.com [mailto:obslist@smarsz.com]> wrote:
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in the same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom <sophanith.chhom@gmail.com [mailto:sophanith.chhom@gmail.com]> wrote:
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on graph is showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Perhaps this will help :
adam. On 28/02/2017 05:01:03, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: These numbers are accurate. Stare at the graph until you work out why.
adam. On 28/02/2017 04:59:47, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: Can you pls explain me? Since I tried to sum up total for current and average are accurate except total max.
Thanks so much.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org [mailto:adama@memetic.org]> wrote:
The total is accurate, you just don't understand what the numbers mean.
adam. On 28/02/2017 04:34:29, Sophanith Chhom <sophanith.chhom@gmail.com [mailto:sophanith.chhom@gmail.com]> wrote: I see, this look somehow we can not fix to let Observium fetch data from each port to sum up from the same polling interval so that the total will be accurate.
Can anyone show me the workaround for this?
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael <obslist@smarsz.com [mailto:obslist@smarsz.com]> wrote:
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in the same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom <sophanith.chhom@gmail.com [mailto:sophanith.chhom@gmail.com]> wrote:
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on graph is showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
wow, I wish I had those paint skills!
2017-02-28 6:04 GMT+01:00 Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org:
Perhaps this will help :
adam.
On 28/02/2017 05:01:03, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: These numbers are accurate. Stare at the graph until you work out why.
adam.
On 28/02/2017 04:59:47, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: Can you pls explain me? Since I tried to sum up total for current and average are accurate except total max.
Thanks so much.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
The total is accurate, you just don't understand what the numbers mean.
adam.
On 28/02/2017 04:34:29, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: I see, this look somehow we can not fix to let Observium fetch data from each port to sum up from the same polling interval so that the total will be accurate.
Can anyone show me the workaround for this?
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael obslist@smarsz.com wrote:
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in the same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom < sophanith.chhom@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on graph is showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi -bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/ cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Do you want to share me something? I could not see it
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Markus Klock markus@best-practice.se wrote:
wow, I wish I had those paint skills!
2017-02-28 6:04 GMT+01:00 Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org:
Perhaps this will help :
adam.
On 28/02/2017 05:01:03, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: These numbers are accurate. Stare at the graph until you work out why.
adam.
On 28/02/2017 04:59:47, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: Can you pls explain me? Since I tried to sum up total for current and average are accurate except total max.
Thanks so much.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
The total is accurate, you just don't understand what the numbers mean.
adam.
On 28/02/2017 04:34:29, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: I see, this look somehow we can not fix to let Observium fetch data from each port to sum up from the same polling interval so that the total will be accurate.
Can anyone show me the workaround for this?
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael obslist@smarsz.com wrote:
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in the same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom < sophanith.chhom@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on graph is showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi -bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi -bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Whilst i can't recreate Adams artistry from my phone, i will try to spell it out...
Port1 : peak throughput at 10am, 100Mbps. Spends the rest of the day at 30Mbps
Port2 : peak at 2pm with 110Mbps. Rest of day at 20Mbps.
The peak values for each individual port do not add up to the peak value of the combined graph (110+20).
So much better in paint...
On 28 February 2017 5:11:43 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote:
Do you want to share me something? I could not see it
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Markus Klock markus@best-practice.se wrote:
wow, I wish I had those paint skills!
2017-02-28 6:04 GMT+01:00 Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org:
Perhaps this will help :
adam.
On 28/02/2017 05:01:03, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: These numbers are accurate. Stare at the graph until you work out
why.
adam.
On 28/02/2017 04:59:47, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: Can you pls explain me? Since I tried to sum up total for current
and
average are accurate except total max.
Thanks so much.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
The total is accurate, you just don't understand what the numbers
mean.
adam.
On 28/02/2017 04:34:29, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: I see, this look somehow we can not fix to let Observium fetch data
from
each port to sum up from the same polling interval so that the
total will
be accurate.
Can anyone show me the workaround for this?
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael obslist@smarsz.com
wrote:
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in
the
same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom < sophanith.chhom@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph
I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate
Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb and another port: 10.95 Gb
So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on
graph is
showing 21.34 instead
Can anyone help to explain me about this? Please check on picture bellow
[image: Inline image 1]
Appreciate for your explanation
Thanks
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing
list
observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi -bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing
list
observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi -bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Sorry, that combined peak should read 110+30Mbps
On 28 February 2017 5:41:54 PM LHDT, Michael obslist@smarsz.com wrote:
Whilst i can't recreate Adams artistry from my phone, i will try to spell it out...
Port1 : peak throughput at 10am, 100Mbps. Spends the rest of the day at 30Mbps
Port2 : peak at 2pm with 110Mbps. Rest of day at 20Mbps.
The peak values for each individual port do not add up to the peak value of the combined graph (110+20).
So much better in paint...
On 28 February 2017 5:11:43 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote:
Do you want to share me something? I could not see it
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Markus Klock markus@best-practice.se wrote:
wow, I wish I had those paint skills!
2017-02-28 6:04 GMT+01:00 Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org:
Perhaps this will help :
adam.
On 28/02/2017 05:01:03, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: These numbers are accurate. Stare at the graph until you work out
why.
adam.
On 28/02/2017 04:59:47, Sophanith Chhom sophanith.chhom@gmail.com wrote: Can you pls explain me? Since I tried to sum up total for current
and
average are accurate except total max.
Thanks so much.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Adam Armstrong
wrote:
The total is accurate, you just don't understand what the numbers
mean.
adam.
On 28/02/2017 04:34:29, Sophanith Chhom
wrote: I see, this look somehow we can not fix to let Observium fetch
data
from
each port to sum up from the same polling interval so that the
total will
be accurate.
Can anyone show me the workaround for this?
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Michael obslist@smarsz.com
wrote:
That's because the two peak/max values may not have occurred in
the
same polling interval.
Michael
On 28 February 2017 2:32:13 PM LHDT, Sophanith Chhom < sophanith.chhom@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi All, > >I have one question related to aggregate maximum of graph > >I have sum up two ports together but it is actually not accurate > >Eg: one port: 10.54 Gb >and another port: 10.95 Gb > >So total of max should be 10.54+10.95 = 21.49 but the real on
graph is
>showing 21.34 instead > >Can anyone help to explain me about this? >Please check on picture bellow > > >[image: Inline image 1] > > >Appreciate for your explanation > >Thanks _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing
list
observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi -bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing
list
observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi -bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Hello, I upgrade from Observium Community Edition 0.16.1.7533 to Observium Community Edition 0.16.10.8128
I followed this simple guide http://www.observium.org/docs/updating/ I followed every step.
Now I cannot see any IPSec traffic graphs on all my Cisco ASA 5505 and 5510s - they were all present before and working great. Any ideas please?
Warren
I think the graphs were moved. Look at your ASA -> Routing-tab Can you find them there?
/Markus
2017-02-28 10:58 GMT+01:00 Warren Daly (OPUS) warren@opus.com.kh:
Hello, I upgrade from Observium Community Edition 0.16.1.7533 to Observium Community Edition 0.16.10.8128
I followed this simple guide http://www.observium.org/docs/updating/ I followed every step.
Now I cannot see any IPSec traffic graphs on all my Cisco ASA 5505 and 5510s - they were all present before and working great. Any ideas please?
Warren
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Someone give me SNMP access to an ASA with IPSEC sessions to put in my dev instance :)
adam. On 28/02/2017 10:22:02, Markus Klock markus@best-practice.se wrote: I think the graphs were moved. Look at your ASA -> Routing-tab Can you find them there?
/Markus
2017-02-28 10:58 GMT+01:00 Warren Daly (OPUS) <warren@opus.com.kh [mailto:warren@opus.com.kh]>:
Hello, I upgrade from Observium Community Edition 0.16.1.7533 to Observium Community Edition 0.16.10.8128
I followed this simple guide http://www.observium.org/docs/updating/ [http://www.observium.org/docs/updating/] I followed every step.
Now I cannot see any IPSec traffic graphs on all my Cisco ASA 5505 and 5510s - they were all present before and working great. Any ideas please?
Warren
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (5)
-
Adam Armstrong -
Markus Klock -
Michael -
Sophanith Chhom -
Warren Daly (OPUS)