Re: [Observium] New install, Alert Checker not triggered
Hello there:
Just built a new system w/ CE version 17.9 on Centos 7.2 . When I create/run the following Alert Check, it shows as 'OK' for my devices:
processor_usage greater 90 * *
When I go to a device and view graphs, it shows a device w/ 100% CPU utilization
No errors in logs/db.log.
Is my syntax incorrect?
Thank you.
Lack of screenshots will practically guarantee no one is going to try to work out what you've done wrong.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 13 Oct 2017, 19:23, at 19:23, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote:
Hello there:
Just built a new system w/ CE version 17.9 on Centos 7.2 . When I create/run the following Alert Check, it shows as 'OK' for my devices:
processor_usage greater 90 * *
When I go to a device and view graphs, it shows a device w/ 100% CPU utilization
No errors in logs/db.log.
Is my syntax incorrect?
Thank you.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Please find attached.
Thank you.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Lack of screenshots will practically guarantee no one is going to try to work out what you've done wrong.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10777 On 13 Oct 2017, at 19:23, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote:
Hello there:
Just built a new system w/ CE version 17.9 on Centos 7.2 . When I create/run the following Alert Check, it shows as 'OK' for my devices:
processor_usage greater 90 * *
When I go to a device and view graphs, it shows a device w/ 100% CPU utilization
No errors in logs/db.log.
Is my syntax incorrect?
Thank you.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
These are "device" alerts not "processor" alerts. The entity type is important!
If you recreate them as "processor" type (as they are in our examples), they'll work.
adam.
Adam Armstrong CEO & Lead Architect Observium Limited On 2017-10-13 19:48:29, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote: Please find attached.
Thank you.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org [mailto:adama@memetic.org]> wrote:
Lack of screenshots will practically guarantee no one is going to try to work out what you've done wrong.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10777] On 13 Oct 2017, at 19:23, J Green <corpengineer@gmail.com [mailto:corpengineer@gmail.com]> wrote: Hello there:
Just built a new system w/ CE version 17.9 on Centos 7.2 . When I create/run the following Alert Check, it shows as 'OK' for my devices:
processor_usage greater 90 * *
When I go to a device and view graphs, it shows a device w/ 100% CPU utilization
No errors in logs/db.log.
Is my syntax incorrect?
Thank you.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
So it should look like:
processor_usage greater 90 * processor
Thank you.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@observium.org wrote:
These are "device" alerts not "processor" alerts. The entity type is important!
If you recreate them as "processor" type (as they are in our examples), they'll work.
adam.
Adam Armstrong CEO & Lead Architect Observium Limited
On 2017-10-13 19:48:29, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote: Please find attached.
Thank you.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Lack of screenshots will practically guarantee no one is going to try to work out what you've done wrong.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10777 On 13 Oct 2017, at 19:23, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote:
Hello there:
Just built a new system w/ CE version 17.9 on Centos 7.2 . When I create/run the following Alert Check, it shows as 'OK' for my devices:
processor_usage greater 90 * *
When I go to a device and view graphs, it shows a device w/ 100% CPU utilization
No errors in logs/db.log.
Is my syntax incorrect?
Thank you.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/ cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
On 14 Oct 2017, at 8:51 am, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote:
So it should look like:
processor_usage greater 90 * processor
No. You need to delete the checker and create it again. You cannot modify and existing checker type.
When you create the new one, the very first pull-down menu called "Entity Type" needs to be changed to Processor.
Then populate it with your original settings/conditions.
What Michael said!
Metrics and attributes are defined per entity type. Processor metrics only exist on the processor type.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 13 Oct 2017, 23:14, at 23:14, Michael obslist@smarsz.com wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017, at 8:51 am, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote:
So it should look like:
processor_usage greater 90 * processor
No. You need to delete the checker and create it again. You cannot modify and existing checker type.
When you create the new one, the very first pull-down menu called "Entity Type" needs to be changed to Processor.
Then populate it with your original settings/conditions. _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Got it, thank you both.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:20 PM Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
What Michael said!
Metrics and attributes are defined per entity type. Processor metrics only exist on the processor type.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10777 On 13 Oct 2017, at 23:14, Michael obslist@smarsz.com wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017, at 8:51 am, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote:
So it should look like:
processor_usage greater 90 * processor
No. You need to delete the checker and create it again. You cannot modify and existing checker type.
When you create the new one, the very first pull-down menu called "Entity Type" needs to be changed to Processor.
Then populate it with your original settings/conditions.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Now you see why screenshots are super important? :D
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 14 Oct 2017, 01:26, at 01:26, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote:
Got it, thank you both.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:20 PM Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
What Michael said!
Metrics and attributes are defined per entity type. Processor metrics
only
exist on the processor type.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10777 On 13 Oct 2017, at 23:14, Michael obslist@smarsz.com wrote:
On 14 Oct 2017, at 8:51 am, J Green corpengineer@gmail.com wrote:
So it should look like:
processor_usage greater 90 * processor
No. You need to delete the checker and create it again. You cannot
modify and existing checker type.
When you create the new one, the very first pull-down menu called
"Entity Type" needs to be changed to Processor.
Then populate it with your original settings/conditions.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (4)
-
Adam Armstrong -
Adam Armstrong -
J Green -
Michael