![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fd23779eab8441e12d65450ac841c1fd.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi all, I have a problem with my bind graphs in Observium 0.14.8.5736 with RRDtool 1.4.7.
I have the Unix-agent configured with the bind plugin on two dev DNS servers. These DNS servers are under really low load, just a couple of requests a minute at most.
If I run dns# ./bind | grep -i req-in,Q
I receive: req-in,QUERY:1562
Which is correct. Then on my Observium box if I run:
obs# rrdtool info /opt/observium/rrd/dns2 /app-bind-1-req-in.rrd | grep query ds[query].index = 0 ds[query].type = "DERIVE" ds[query].minimal_heartbeat = 600 ds[query].min = 0.0000000000e+00 ds[query].max = 7.5000000000e+06 ds[query].last_ds = "1562" <<<<<<<<< Looks good ds[query].value = 0.0000000000e+00 ds[query].unknown_sec = 0
But my graphs in the web interface of totally wrong. My incoming requests graph is showing 100-250 million.
Any tips of where to start looking to solve this?
Thanks, Brad
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/21caf0a08d095be7196a1648d20942be.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
[06|11:00:19] <@sid3windr> Sykotic: million? are you sure?
http://www.observium.org/wiki/FAQs#What_are_those_weird_letters_in_the_graph...
On 06/08/2014 23:53, Brad Pearpoint wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with my bind graphs in Observium 0.14.8.5736 with RRDtool 1.4.7.
I have the Unix-agent configured with the bind plugin on two dev DNS servers. These DNS servers are under really low load, just a couple of requests a minute at most.
If I run
dns# ./bind | grep -i req-in,Q
I receive:
req-in,QUERY:1562
Which is correct. Then on my Observium box if I run:
obs# rrdtool info /opt/observium/rrd/dns2 /app-bind-1-req-in.rrd | grep query
ds[query].index = 0
ds[query].type = "DERIVE"
ds[query].minimal_heartbeat = 600
ds[query].min = 0.0000000000e+00
ds[query].max = 7.5000000000e+06
ds[query].last_ds = "1562" <<<<<<<<< Looks good
ds[query].value = 0.0000000000e+00
ds[query].unknown_sec = 0
But my graphs in the web interface of totally wrong. My incoming requests graph is showing 100-250 million.
Any tips of where to start looking to solve this?
Thanks,
Brad
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fd23779eab8441e12d65450ac841c1fd.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
[06|11:00:19] <@sid3windr> Sykotic: million? are you sure? http://www.observium.org/wiki/FAQs#What_are_those_weird_letters_in_the_graph...
Thank you and sorry for missing that reply.
That would be the answer!
Brad
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/0fa97865a0e1ab36152b6b2299eedb49.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
I hope no one ever asks you to buy 500mm of pipe. That could be a very expensive trip to the hardware store.
adam.
On 2014-08-06 22:53, Brad Pearpoint wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with my bind graphs in Observium 0.14.8.5736 with RRDtool 1.4.7.
I have the Unix-agent configured with the bind plugin on two dev DNS servers. These DNS servers are under really low load, just a couple of requests a minute at most.
If I run
dns# ./bind | grep -i req-in,Q
I receive:
req-in,QUERY:1562
Which is correct. Then on my Observium box if I run:
obs# rrdtool info /opt/observium/rrd/dns2 /app-bind-1-req-in.rrd | grep query
ds[query].index = 0
ds[query].type = "DERIVE"
ds[query].minimal_heartbeat = 600
ds[query].min = 0.0000000000e+00
ds[query].max = 7.5000000000e+06
ds[query].last_ds = "1562" <<<<<<<<< Looks good
ds[query].value = 0.0000000000e+00
ds[query].unknown_sec = 0
But my graphs in the web interface of totally wrong. My incoming requests graph is showing 100-250 million.
Any tips of where to start looking to solve this?
Thanks,
Brad
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/635e38c05c6c91425e7c390c1cbccb20.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
I hope no one ever asks you to buy 500mm of pipe. That could be a very expensive trip to the hardware store.
how else would 500 million unix processes communicate?
you probably also want a bit bucket and some fork handles ;-)
participants (4)
-
Adam Armstrong
-
Brad Pearpoint
-
Robert Brooks
-
Tom Laermans