Re: [Observium] observium Digest, Vol 40, Issue 9
I think the majority of these complaints have come from users who have forgotten this is a grassroots, homegrown effort, which single handedly out performs many other NMS systems albeit paid or free.
If you expect answers and resolution to every minute detail which you don't like, put you money where your mouth is.
The Observium team has been more than gracious to continue to develop such a great monitoring platform and keep it going while still maintaining the open source ideals.
On Nov 3, 2013, at 4:13 PM, observium-request@observium.org wrote:
Send observium mailing list submissions to observium@observium.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to observium-request@observium.org
You can reach the person managing the list at observium-owner@observium.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of observium digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Fwd: Regarding developers attitude... (Adam Armstrong)
- Re: Fwd: Regarding developers attitude... (Adam Armstrong)
- Re: Fwd: Regarding developers attitude... (Doychin Dokov)
- Re: observium just stops after switching to subscription. (Tom Laermans)
- Re: Fwd: Regarding developers attitude... (Tom Laermans)
Message: 1 Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 21:43:01 +0000 From: Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org To: Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Fwd: Regarding developers attitude... Message-ID: fde9ac9c729e4be8f2eebf3be002bb08@memetic.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Fuck off, cuntmuppet.
Either read what's come before, or say nothing.
FUCKING HELL.
On 2013-11-03 20:52, Tom Henderson wrote: Maybe take it offline gents? Of at least off list? http://xkcd.com/438/ [1]
A simple "Hi $user, this is covered on the wiki here: $url. Thanks for using observium." would be trivial to implement with any email templating system. Even "Sorry, $feature is not currently in the timeline because of $reasons." would be better than getting in an argument.
Cheers
Tom
--
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not disclose, copy, or distribute any information contained in or attached to it, or take any action/inaction based on it. Please contact us immediately, and delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and not of Pack & Company (NZ) Limited (the "Company"), however any intellectual property contained in or attached to this email is the property of the Company. Thank you.
Links:
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Message: 2 Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 21:44:16 +0000 From: Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org To: Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Fwd: Regarding developers attitude... Message-ID: 80652049ab831e346e2bec554d8ee638@memetic.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 2013-11-03 21:40, Doychin Dokov wrote: As my first message says, I've tried to contact Adam on his personal e-mail to get an idea for the reason for this attitude, to no avail.
One more time, I've not requested a new feature or anything else, I just reported an already-existing part of observium not looking correctly, asked if it's a leftover and planned to be reworked, as the similar BGP stats look fine, and even offered to work on it.
There are no $reasons for such $attitude, and it's not the first time it happens, so I wanted to know why, and how is this considered normal?
You did none of those things.
So now i'm going to add liar to the list of reasons why we will no longer accept any communication from you.
adam.
Message: 3 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 00:04:59 +0200 From: Doychin Dokov dokov@silistra.tv To: Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Fwd: Regarding developers attitude... Message-ID: CALD-xbC4JXP68OFZdJmCcwy-ysN=o3pHjstd=LpujhZADRFGow@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Adam,
Everyone would have seen with their eyes what I have offered, if you have not deleted the issue in jira!
Also, I have pasted my exact reply in my first email, here it is once again:
"Now that Observium is paid, we deserve some proper attention to problems, at least.... Not just the close-it-as-fast-as-you-can attitude you have so far....
Also, I'm more than willing to fix it myself by looking at the BGP code, so was jast curios if there is any plan to already rework the OSPF pages, as what is seen on the screenshot is really of no use - and I guess your opinion is the same as well."
I'm very much sure you have read it, as you and Tom Laermans have replied to it that i have no idea what I have paid for....
So, naming me a "liar" is completely inappropriate, and is a true confirmation about your inability to communicate normally with people. You are digging observium's grave.
- D.
2013/11/3 Doychin Dokov dokov@silistra.tv
As my first message says, I've tried to contact Adam on his personal e-mail to get an idea for the reason for this attitude, to no avail.
One more time, I've not requested a new feature or anything else, I just reported an already-existing part of observium not looking correctly, asked if it's a leftover and planned to be reworked, as the similar BGP stats look fine, and even offered to work on it.
There are no $reasons for such $attitude, and it's not the first time it happens, so I wanted to know why, and how is this considered normal?
- D.
2013/11/3 Tom Henderson tom@pack.co.nz
Maybe take it offline gents? Of at least off list? http://xkcd.com/438/
A simple "Hi $user, this is covered on the wiki here: $url. Thanks for using observium." would be trivial to implement with any email templating system. Even "Sorry, $feature is not currently in the timeline because of $reasons." would be better than getting in an argument.
Cheers
Tom
--
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not disclose, copy, or distribute any information contained in or attached to it, or take any action/inaction based on it. Please contact us immediately, and delete this email from your system. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and not of Pack & Company (NZ) Limited (the "Company"), however any intellectual property contained in or attached to this email is the property of the Company. Thank you.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (1)
-
Corey Robertson