Re: [Observium] FW: observium Digest, Vol 33, Issue 45
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/0fa97865a0e1ab36152b6b2299eedb49.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
You are not our target market, then.
Sam Munzani smunzani@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-04-22 15:32, Sam Munzani wrote:
Hi,
I deployed Observium over the weekend to try out. Reading through documents, I figured out how to exclude specific interface types. However trying to figure out how to exclude a specific interface? E.g. The list might be Fa0/30, Fa0/37, Gig0/9, Gig0/42. No contiguous interface.
This is contra to the design ethos of Observium, thus there is no simple way to do this.
Thanks, adam.
While its a great concept, its not scalable. I have Qty 40 of the Cisco 48 port switches and not all ports I care about. These are desktop ports and I care to graph uplink ports only. Even if it does it efficiently, it is junk data that I would never use.
What would have been awesome is let Observium discover everything and let administrators decide what they want to graph.
Its sad that even though I like the tool, it doesn't fit me because of this limitation(or so called feature).
My 2 cents.
Sam
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (1)
-
Adam Armstrong