Ok. Thanks for the response.
Cheers, Ivan
On 10 May 2016 at 10:06, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
It's not something that I think we can implement without significant negative impact on other users.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r
On May 9, 2016, at 23:00, Ivan Jukic ijukic13@gmail.com wrote:
We would benefit a lot from this change. Is it something that would be likely added in the near future?
Cheers, Ivan
On 9 May 2016 at 21:34, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Hi,
We don't currently track the discards rate /delta, as it's quite database intensive, and we already have issues scaling the ports table!
(Tracking this would require 4/6 new fields in the ports table!)
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r
On May 9, 2016, at 13:23, Laszlo Nemeth laszlo.nemeth@emarsys.com wrote:
Hello,
On the 7793 we try to create a check that alert if the interface discards TX errors on our Nexus switch more than 0 per sec.
This error is real, we see it on Observium graphs (Device->Port->Error->Discards TX ) and on the switch’s CLI too.
We created this check but looks like it doesn’t work:
ifOutDiscards_rate notequals 0
We tried it with “gt 1” instead of "notequals 0” without result. :(
In an another check the ”ifInErrors_rate” is working, but the ifOutDiscards_rate not.
Picture is attached.
What we did wrong?
BR Laszlo
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium