[laugh] Roger Larsen reacted to your message: ________________________________ From: James Tandy via observium observium@lists.observium.org Sent: Tuesday, 26 May 2026 17:36:57 To: Observium observium@lists.observium.org Cc: Jim DeVico jim.devico@wakefern.com; Adam Armstrong adama@observium.org; James Tandy admin@tandyukservers.co.uk Subject: [Observium] Re: transceivers
Just makes me think of https://xkcd.com/927/ lol
Sent from my Galaxy
-------- Original message -------- From: Adam Armstrong via observium observium@lists.observium.org Date: 26/05/2026 17:44 (GMT+00:00) To: Observium observium@lists.observium.org, Jim DeVico via observium observium@lists.observium.org Cc: Jim DeVico jim.devico@wakefern.com, Adam Armstrong adama@observium.org Subject: [Observium] Re: transceivers
It's complicated. It depends upon specific support being added for the platform usually, because no vendor has been able to decide on a standards-based way of doing anything new since 2001.
Thanks, adam.
Jim DeVico via observium wrote on 26/05/2026 16:53: What does observium consider a transceiver and how are they read? I do not see any info regarding any of my fiber SFPs.
[cid:image.png]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list -- observium@lists.observium.orgmailto:observium@lists.observium.org To unsubscribe send an email to observium-leave@lists.observium.orgmailto:observium-leave@lists.observium.org
-- Sent from Postboxhttps://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach
