The graphs look good. The bps/pps graphs mirror each other. I created a Port alert for ifInOctets_perc/ifOutOctets_perc with a 20 min wait for all my cisco devices a couple hours ago.
Thanks! -Chip
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
In device -> ports, the table has bps/pps values. Also, are the graphs ok?
adam.
On 2014-01-20 16:31, Chip Pleasants wrote:
By HTMP tables, Do you mean, does the usage being reported corresponded to the physical/logical interface usage? We have other tools doing the same job which I can compare against. I'll take a look around. 'll also take a look on the interface when the high usage is occurring.
-Chip
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
It does seem that perhaps there is a 32/64bit counter issue, too, as the numerical values passed to the new and old alerting code are generated at the same points.
Are the values in the HTML tables showing correct values?
adam.
On 2014-01-20 15:53, Chip Pleasants wrote:
Ah. Sorry. Creating ones in the new system now.
-Chip
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
That's the old alerting stuff, use the new stuff, it's less broken!
I recognise your name, so I'm pretty sure you're a subscriber :)
adam.
On 2014-01-20 10:42, Chip Pleasants wrote:
Is there a way to see all Ports that have been disabled for altering?
I enabled email alerts in config.php for port percentage, but seeing some odd behavior with the percentage portion with the physical interfaces inside a etherchannel interface. Below are a couple emails I received. The bandwidth mentioned in the email is more than the physical interface. Is there another option I need to turn on or off to account for this behavior? Any suggestions are appreciated.
This physical interface didn't go over 444M. The port channel have 8 physical link in it.
Port saturation threshold alarm: cisco.switch.com [1] [1] [1] on GigabitEthernet3/1
Rates:1.63Gbps/11.6kbps(163/0) >85% of 1Gbps
Another email
This physical interface hit a 1G. The port channel has 2 physical links in it.
Port saturation threshold alarm: cisco.switch.com [1] [1] [1] on GigabitEthernet2/25
Rates:147Mbps/6.62Gbps(15/662) >85% of 1Gbps
added to config.php
$config['alerts']['port_util_alert'] = TRUE; $config['alerts']['port_util_perc'] = 85;
Thanks, Chip
Links:
[1] http://cisco.switch.com [1] [1]
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2] [2]
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2] [2]
Links:
[1] http://cisco.switch.com [1] [2] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2]
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2]
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [2]
Links:
[1] http://cisco.switch.com [2] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium