10 Dec
2015
10 Dec
'15
10:05 a.m.
Woah, even I didn't know about that =)
For associations, adding a new association is a logical OR, btw. Adding multiple conditions inside one association is AND.
When adding a checker you can only add the first association; but there's an "Add" button in the checker interface to add more.
Tom
On 2015-12-10 11:03, Markus Klock wrote:
You can use the (undocumented) condition "list" or "in".
*[Entity Match]*
bgpPeerRemoteAs list 174,3356,2914,5580
You can use the (undocumented) condition list. /Markus
2015-12-10 10:37 GMT+01:00 Robert Williams <Robert@custodiandc.com mailto:Robert@custodiandc.com>:
Hi, What’s the correct syntax for an entity match which will match a selection of ASNs? I need an alert checker which will look for a specific set of ASNs and alert for any BGP session being not-up. Currently for our iBGP we use: *[Conditions]* bgpPeerState ne established bgpPeerAdminStatus notequals stop ** *[Device]* * *[Entity Match]* bgpPeerRemoteAs match <ourASN> This works perfectly. Now – what I’m after is that I need a new checker which will match eBGP ASNs like 174,3356,2914,5580 etc. all in one rule (the ‘important’ ASNs, for want of a better term). I have tried a selection of things but I’m obviously missing what the logical ‘or’ element should be in this case, as all my attempts at using multiple ASNs within a match just result in zero matches. Can someone point me in the right direction please? Cheers! Robert Williams Custodian Data Centre Email: Robert@CustodianDC.com http://www.CustodianDC.com _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium