Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 17 oct. 2015 à 01:50, Aaron Finney aaron.finney@openx.com a écrit :
Ah, latest in 13.x train...13.2X51-D38.
Question - what are your polling times like for your 96s? Do you have any stacks with > 2 members?
I really like Juniper but I don't trust any vendor on stacking technology. There is always something wrong during upgrade / services issue. So I don't have any stack in production and I will not ! 96s are pretty fast. I'm only doing layer3 and mpls raw interfaces on my qfx, no layer 2 ( layer2 is bad :) )
On a previous release I had a nice bug. I was able to snmp read if-out and if-in traffic and I was able to see the traffic locally with monitor interfaces but snmp-get was polling a value of zero. I had to upgrade. I had to upgrade to the latest 14.x train because of mpls bugs and feature I needed that was only available in 14.x at that time ( mostly mpls ). So I don't have any experience on 13.x train since the bug I had :)
Our QFXs are marginally better, but our ex4550's and 4200's with > 2 members all take over 300s to poll.
Still no stack but bugs. For some reason, some ex4550 ( I have 12 in production ) don't send any if information. I have the exact same release / same firewall filter and one ex is showing his interfaces and the other one have his interfaces popping up and down on Observium.
I upgraded to the latest 12.3R11 and still the same issue. I don't have time to debug it, but there is weird things ^^ The only equipment reporting bugs like that are juniper ex
We have a few hundred 3300's deployed as well, which we've written off as a lost cause for bulk polling. :)
Same here. A nice feature will be to have 2 pokers or 2 method. Bulk once every like 12 hours and poll snmp stats when you want. This will help a lot because bulk is really killing the cpu ^^
Also, debug sent.
Aaron
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Raphael Maunier raphael.maunier@gmail.com wrote: Define “latest” Junos version ? 13.2X51-D38 / 14.1X53-D30 ?
I have 20 QFX 5100 ( 48S and 96S ) in production and I don’t have any issues like that :)
Raphael
2015-10-16 21:12 GMT+02:00 Mike Stupalov mike@observium.org:
Hi,
please send me debug from poller debug for this device: ./poller.php -d -m ports -h <your_device>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Aaron Finney aaron.finney@openx.com wrote: Just FYI, the 10G ports on a QFX 5100 running latest JunOS are being reported with a speed of 4.29Gbps, which I assume is likely the actual returned value being constrained by a 32-bit container?
Not a critical thing for us to fix - I was actually disabling polling for all of our Juniper vcp stacks in Observium (most of them take > 300s to complete a polling cycle) but noticed this as I was going through them and figured I'd pass it along.
Cheers,
Aaron
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
-- Mike Stupalov http://observium.org/
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
Aaron Finney | Network Engineer 888 East Walnut Street, 2nd Floor | Pasadena, CA 91101 office: +1 (626) 466-1141 x6035
Watch how we make online advertising simple: http://bit.ly/Ent_vid www.openx.com | follow us on: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium