Group with 500+ devices

Karolis Birgėla

17 Feb 2017 17 Feb '17

8:35 a.m.

Hi,

I have a problem with device classification to specific groups. We currently have 750 devices added in our network. Some users can only have access to specific devices, which led us to creating a group associated with them. The problem is, that more than 500 devices belong to the group, and when we attach this group to a user, it lags like hell. The main window of Observium loads slowly, and the search works very slow. I dont think that the server is incapable of proccesing this quickly It's a server with 80gb of ram, 24core cpu. By the way, admin accounts work perfectly .

Is this a bug? Or something needs to be done in order? Let me know, thank you.

Show replies by date

Tom Laermans

17 Feb 17 Feb

9:56 a.m.

Hi Karolis,

I presume the issue causing the slowdown is access checking to see if the user is allowed to access the device. For admin users, the entire check is skipped as they can always access everything, which is why it would be faster when using an admin user.

This is something we'll have to look into speeding up, if my guess is correct...

Tom

On 17/02/2017 08:35, Karolis Birgėla wrote:

...

Hi,

I have a problem with device classification to specific groups. We currently have 750 devices added in our network. Some users can only have access to specific devices, which led us to creating a group associated with them. The problem is, that more than 500 devices belong to the group, and when we attach this group to a user, it lags like hell. The main window of Observium loads slowly, and the search works very slow. I dont think that the server is incapable of proccesing this quickly It's a server with 80gb of ram, 24core cpu. By the way, admin accounts work perfectly .

Is this a bug? Or something needs to be done in order? Let me know, thank you.

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR

10:05 a.m.

Dear Karolis,

I’m interested to implement similar segregate accesses (group of devices per group of users).

Could you please share how you implemented it ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 09:56, « observium au nom de Tom Laermans » <observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de tom.laermans@powersource.cx> a écrit :

Hi Karolis,

This is something we'll have to look into speeding up, if my guess is correct...

Tom

On 17/02/2017 08:35, Karolis Birgėla wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a problem with device classification to specific groups. We > currently have 750 devices added in our network. > Some users can only have access to specific devices, which led us to > creating a group associated with them. > The problem is, that more than 500 devices belong to the group, and > when we attach this group to a user, it lags like hell. The main > window of Observium loads slowly, and the search works very slow. > I dont think that the server is incapable of proccesing this quickly > It's a server with 80gb of ram, 24core cpu. > By the way, admin accounts work perfectly . > > Is this a bug? Or something needs to be done in order? Let me know, > thank you. > >

BENGELLOUN - ZAHR Youssef - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr Web : prodware.fr

_______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR

19 Feb 19 Feb

10:26 a.m.

Dear all,

So this page appeared since last time I visited : http://observium.org/docs/user_levels/

We are interested in implementing delegation of administration. Could someone explain how it is implemented by sharing a functional example / template ? What is the minimum version to implement this ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 10:05, « Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR » ybzahr@prodware.fr a écrit :

Dear Karolis,

I’m interested to implement similar segregate accesses (group of devices per group of users).

Could you please share how you implemented it ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 09:56, « observium au nom de Tom Laermans » <observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de tom.laermans@powersource.cx> a écrit :

Hi Karolis,

This is something we'll have to look into speeding up, if my guess is correct...

Tom

BENGELLOUN - ZAHR Youssef - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr Web : prodware.fr

_______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Adam Armstrong

3:20 p.m.

What exactly do you want to delegate?

Only level 10 can change observium settings, except level 8 which can create planned maintenance.

Adam.

⁣Sent from BlueMail

On 19 Feb 2017, 09:26, at 09:26, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

...

Dear all,

So this page appeared since last time I visited : http://observium.org/docs/user_levels/

We are interested in implementing delegation of administration. Could someone explain how it is implemented by sharing a functional example / template ? What is the minimum version to implement this ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 10:05, « Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR » ybzahr@prodware.fr a écrit :

Dear Karolis,

I’m interested to implement similar segregate accesses (group of devices per group of users).

Could you please share how you implemented it ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 09:56, « observium au nom de Tom Laermans » <observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de tom.laermans@powersource.cx> a écrit :
   Hi Karolis,
I presume the issue causing the slowdown is access checking to see if the user is allowed to access the device. For admin users, the entire check is skipped as they can always access everything, which is why it would be faster when using an admin user.

This is something we'll have to look into speeding up, if my guess is correct...
   Tom

   On 17/02/2017 08:35, Karolis Birgėla wrote:
   >
   > Hi,
   >
...
I have a problem with device classification to specific groups. We
   > currently have 750 devices added in our network.
...
Some users can only have access to specific devices, which led us to
   > creating a group associated with them.
...
The problem is, that more than 500 devices belong to the group, and
> when we attach this group to a user, it lags like hell. The main
...
window of Observium loads slowly, and the search works very slow. I dont think that the server is incapable of proccesing this quickly
   > It's a server with 80gb of ram, 24core cpu.
   > By the way, admin accounts work perfectly .
   >
...
Is this a bug? Or something needs to be done in order? Let me know,
   > thank you.
   >
   >
BENGELLOUN - ZAHR Youssef - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr Web : prodware.fr
   > observium mailing list
   > observium@observium.org
   > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium


   _______________________________________________
   observium mailing list
   observium@observium.org
   http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR

3:23 p.m.

Adam Armstrong

3:26 p.m.

You just create a user with level 1, and then give them access to the devices, groups of devices and entities you want them to have access to.

We don't yet have the concept of a group of users.

Adam.

⁣Sent from BlueMail

On 19 Feb 2017, 14:23, at 14:23, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

...

Dear Adam,

For starters, I just want to give a simple view access to a group of devices to certains users. That could evolve in time, I understand I could grant them more privileges later on.

I’m looking for a clear implementation example.

Best regards.

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

De : observium observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org Répondre à : Observium Public Support observium@observium.org Date : dimanche 19 février 2017 à 15:20 À : Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Objet : Re: [Observium] Group with 500+ devices

What exactly do you want to delegate?

Only level 10 can change observium settings, except level 8 which can create planned maintenance.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

On 19 Feb 2017, at 09:26, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear all,

So this page appeared since last time I visited : http://observium.org/docs/user_levels/

We are interested in implementing delegation of administration. Could someone explain how it is implemented by sharing a functional example / template ? What is the minimum version to implement this ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 10:05, « Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR » ybzahr@prodware.fr a écrit :

Dear Karolis,

I’m interested to implement similar segregate accesses (group of devices per group of users).

Could you please share how you implemented it ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 09:56, « observium au nom de Tom Laermans » <observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de tom.laermans@powersource.cx> a écrit :
   Hi Karolis,
I presume the issue causing the slowdown is access checking to see if the user is allowed to access the device. For admin users, the entire check is skipped as they can always access everything, which is why it would be faster when using an admin user.

This is something we'll have to look into speeding up, if my guess is correct...
   Tom

   On 17/02/2017 08:35, Karolis Birgėla wrote:
Hi,

I have a problem with device classification to specific groups. We currently have 750 devices added in our network. Some users can only have access to specific devices, which led us to creating a group associated with them. The problem is, that more than 500 devices belong to the group, and when we attach this group to a user, it lags like hell. The main window of Observium loads slowly, and the search works very slow. I dont think that the server is incapable of proccesing this quickly It's a server with 80gb of ram, 24core cpu. By the way, admin accounts work perfectly .

Is this a bug? Or something needs to be done in order? Let me know, thank you.

BENGELLOUN - ZAHR Youssef - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr Web : prodware.fr

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
   observium mailing list
   observium@observium.org
   http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR

3:30 p.m.

Adam Armstrong

4:01 p.m.

I don't use LDAP.

LDAP should really only be used by people capable of reading the documentation and configurations and working stuff out for themselves.

Adam.

⁣Sent from BlueMail

On 19 Feb 2017, 14:31, at 14:31, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

...

Dear Adam,

Ok, I get that :-)

Question is : How do I do that in practical ? What do I configure and where ? What is the minimum version I need to be running ?

For your information, we use LDAP authentication.

Thank you in advance for your explanations.

BR.

Le 19 févr. 2017 à 15:27, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org a écrit :

You just create a user with level 1, and then give them access to the devices, groups of devices and entities you want them to have access to.

We don't yet have the concept of a group of users.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

On 19 Feb 2017, at 14:23, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear Adam,

For starters, I just want to give a simple view access to a group of devices to certains users. That could evolve in time, I understand I could grant them more privileges later on.

I’m looking for a clear implementation example.

Best regards.

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

De : observium observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org Répondre à : Observium Public Support observium@observium.org Date : dimanche 19 février 2017 à 15:20 À : Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Objet : Re: [Observium] Group with 500+ devices

What exactly do you want to delegate?

Only level 10 can change observium settings, except level 8 which can create planned maintenance.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

On 19 Feb 2017, at 09:26, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear all,

So this page appeared since last time I visited : http://observium.org/docs/user_levels/

We are interested in implementing delegation of administration. Could someone explain how it is implemented by sharing a functional example / template ? What is the minimum version to implement this ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 10:05, « Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR » ybzahr@prodware.fr a écrit :

Dear Karolis,

I’m interested to implement similar segregate accesses (group of devices per group of users).

Could you please share how you implemented it ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 09:56, « observium au nom de Tom Laermans » <observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de tom.laermans@powersource.cx> a écrit :
   Hi Karolis,
I presume the issue causing the slowdown is access checking to see if the user is allowed to access the device. For admin users, the entire check is skipped as they can always access everything, which is why it would be faster when using an admin user.

This is something we'll have to look into speeding up, if my guess is correct...
   Tom

   On 17/02/2017 08:35, Karolis Birgėla wrote:
Hi,

I have a problem with device classification to specific groups. We currently have 750 devices added in our network. Some users can only have access to specific devices, which led us to creating a group associated with them. The problem is, that more than 500 devices belong to the group, and when we attach this group to a user, it lags like hell. The main window of Observium loads slowly, and the search works very slow. I dont think that the server is incapable of proccesing this quickly It's a server with 80gb of ram, 24core cpu. By the way, admin accounts work perfectly .

Is this a bug? Or something needs to be done in order? Let me know, thank you.

BENGELLOUN - ZAHR Youssef - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr Web : prodware.fr

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
   observium mailing list
   observium@observium.org
   http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR

5:24 p.m.

Adam Armstrong

5:48 p.m.

I don't know. I don't use LDAP :D

You need to use LDAP groups to assign users to levels, then add access for each device/entity to each user in the user editing interface in the web ui.

The LDAP configuration will be documented in our documentation, probably!

Adam.

⁣Sent from BlueMail

On 19 Feb 2017, 16:24, at 16:24, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

...

Dear Adam,

Ok, let's forgot about LDAP.

I just need a simple example : What directives do I need to configure ? In which files ? Etc.

The rest, I Will be able to handle my end.

Best regards.

Le 19 févr. 2017 à 16:01, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org a écrit :

I don't use LDAP.

LDAP should really only be used by people capable of reading the documentation and configurations and working stuff out for themselves.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

On 19 Feb 2017, at 14:31, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear Adam,

Ok, I get that :-)

Question is : How do I do that in practical ? What do I configure and where ? What is the minimum version I need to be running ?

For your information, we use LDAP authentication.

Thank you in advance for your explanations.

BR.

Le 19 févr. 2017 à 15:27, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org a écrit :

You just create a user with level 1, and then give them access to the devices, groups of devices and entities you want them to have access to.

We don't yet have the concept of a group of users.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

On 19 Feb 2017, at 14:23, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear Adam,

For starters, I just want to give a simple view access to a group of devices to certains users. That could evolve in time, I understand I could grant them more privileges later on.

I’m looking for a clear implementation example.

Best regards.

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

De : observium observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org Répondre à : Observium Public Support observium@observium.org Date : dimanche 19 février 2017 à 15:20 À : Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Objet : Re: [Observium] Group with 500+ devices

What exactly do you want to delegate?

Only level 10 can change observium settings, except level 8 which can create planned maintenance.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

On 19 Feb 2017, at 09:26, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear all,

So this page appeared since last time I visited : http://observium.org/docs/user_levels/

We are interested in implementing delegation of administration. Could someone explain how it is implemented by sharing a functional example / template ? What is the minimum version to implement this ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 10:05, « Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR » ybzahr@prodware.fr a écrit :

Dear Karolis,

I’m interested to implement similar segregate accesses (group of devices per group of users).

Could you please share how you implemented it ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 09:56, « observium au nom de Tom Laermans » <observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de tom.laermans@powersource.cx> a écrit :
   Hi Karolis,
I presume the issue causing the slowdown is access checking to see if the user is allowed to access the device. For admin users, the entire check is skipped as they can always access everything, which is why it would be faster when using an admin user.

This is something we'll have to look into speeding up, if my guess is correct...
   Tom

   On 17/02/2017 08:35, Karolis Birgėla wrote:
Hi,

I have a problem with device classification to specific groups. We currently have 750 devices added in our network. Some users can only have access to specific devices, which led us to creating a group associated with them. The problem is, that more than 500 devices belong to the group, and when we attach this group to a user, it lags like hell. The main window of Observium loads slowly, and the search works very slow. I dont think that the server is incapable of proccesing this quickly It's a server with 80gb of ram, 24core cpu. By the way, admin accounts work perfectly .

Is this a bug? Or something needs to be done in order? Let me know, thank you.

BENGELLOUN - ZAHR Youssef - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr Web : prodware.fr

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
   observium mailing list
   observium@observium.org
   http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR

5:54 p.m.

Adam Armstrong

6:02 p.m.

No, you can't. Because you need to assign the user level from LDAP groups.

Also, I'm not going to walk you through which buttons to click in the ui, because you're not 6 years old.

Go look at the user editing interface. It's not complicated.

Adam.

⁣Sent from BlueMail

On 19 Feb 2017, 16:54, at 16:54, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

...

Ok. For the sack of the example, let's petend This were plein text file authent.

Could you please share an example ?

Thank you.

De : Adam Armstrong Envoyé : ‎19/‎02/‎2017 17:48 À : Observium Network Observation System Objet : Re: [Observium] Group with 500+ devices

I don't know. I don't use LDAP :D

You need to use LDAP groups to assign users to levels, then add access for each device/entity to each user in the user editing interface in the web ui.

The LDAP configuration will be documented in our documentation, probably!

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

On 19 Feb 2017, at 16:24, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear Adam,

Ok, let's forgot about LDAP.

I just need a simple example : What directives do I need to configure ? In which files ? Etc.

The rest, I Will be able to handle my end.

Best regards.

Le 19 févr. 2017 à 16:01, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org a écrit :

I don't use LDAP.

LDAP should really only be used by people capable of reading the documentation and configurations and working stuff out for themselves.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

On 19 Feb 2017, at 14:31, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear Adam,

Ok, I get that :-)

Question is : How do I do that in practical ? What do I configure and where ? What is the minimum version I need to be running ?

For your information, we use LDAP authentication.

Thank you in advance for your explanations.

BR.

Le 19 févr. 2017 à 15:27, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org a écrit :

You just create a user with level 1, and then give them access to the devices, groups of devices and entities you want them to have access to.

We don't yet have the concept of a group of users.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

On 19 Feb 2017, at 14:23, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear Adam,

For starters, I just want to give a simple view access to a group of devices to certains users. That could evolve in time, I understand I could grant them more privileges later on.

I’m looking for a clear implementation example.

Best regards.

Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 - F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr _____________________________________________ Web : prodware.fr

De : observium observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org Répondre à : Observium Public Support observium@observium.org Date : dimanche 19 février 2017 à 15:20 À : Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Objet : Re: [Observium] Group with 500+ devices

What exactly do you want to delegate?

Only level 10 can change observium settings, except level 8 which can create planned maintenance.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

On 19 Feb 2017, at 09:26, Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR ybzahr@prodware.fr wrote:

Dear all,

So this page appeared since last time I visited : http://observium.org/docs/user_levels/

We are interested in implementing delegation of administration. Could someone explain how it is implemented by sharing a functional example / template ? What is the minimum version to implement this ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 10:05, « Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR » ybzahr@prodware.fr a écrit :

Dear Karolis,

I’m interested to implement similar segregate accesses (group of devices per group of users).

Could you please share how you implemented it ?

Thank you.

Le 17/02/2017 09:56, « observium au nom de Tom Laermans » <observium-bounces@observium.org au nom de tom.laermans@powersource.cx> a écrit :
   Hi Karolis,
I presume the issue causing the slowdown is access checking to see if the user is allowed to access the device. For admin users, the entire check is skipped as they can always access everything, which is why it would be faster when using an admin user.

This is something we'll have to look into speeding up, if my guess is correct...
   Tom

   On 17/02/2017 08:35, Karolis Birgėla wrote:
Hi,

I have a problem with device classification to specific groups. We currently have 750 devices added in our network. Some users can only have access to specific devices, which led us to creating a group associated with them. The problem is, that more than 500 devices belong to the group, and when we attach this group to a user, it lags like hell. The main window of Observium loads slowly, and the search works very slow. I dont think that the server is incapable of proccesing this quickly It's a server with 80gb of ram, 24core cpu. By the way, admin accounts work perfectly .

Is this a bug? Or something needs to be done in order? Let me know, thank you.

BENGELLOUN - ZAHR Youssef - Consultant Expert Prodware France T : +33 979 999 000 F : +33 988 814 001 - ybzahr@prodware.fr Web : prodware.fr

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
   observium mailing list
   observium@observium.org
   http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

2989

Age (days ago)

2991

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

12 comments

4 participants

tags (0)

participants (4)

Adam Armstrong
Karolis Birgėla
Tom Laermans
Youssef BENGELLOUN - ZAHR