Re: [Observium] VRF's on a Cisco 6500 series
Tell Cisco. :D
Kristoffer Björk kristoffer.bjork@gmail.com wrote:
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
I agree with Kris here, lots of vrfs out there on these things. I don't mind in the end, its not a critical feature but a nice to have. Theres more important things to be done at the moment.
Better start complaining to Cisco then; read carfully what Adam is saying.
If VRFs are discovered on 7k6 but not on 6k5, it's not Observium's fault, but buggy IOS... ;)
Tom
On 2/05/2013 19:34, Darius Seroka wrote:
I agree with Kris here, lots of vrfs out there on these things. I don't mind in the end, its not a critical feature but a nice to have. Theres more important things to be done at the moment.
-- Regards, Darius Jan Seroka dariusjs@gmail.com mailto:dariusjs@gmail.com
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
Tell Cisco. :D Kristoffer Björk <kristoffer.bjork@gmail.com <mailto:kristoffer.bjork@gmail.com>> wrote: Not to be rude but there are alot of people doing routing with multiple VRF's in the 6500, with sup720 and sup2T etc it's actually quite nice as a router. I find it's much more common then the ASR's in enterprise networks that i've been working in. Cheers. //K On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: 6500? Why, that's a switch! No need for qa'd vrf snmp support there! Muwhahaha. Darius Seroka <dariusjs@gmail.com <mailto:dariusjs@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi List, Has anyone got a Cisco 6500 series on observium with VRF's? I've recently been adding some cisco gear to observium and the vrf's don't get picked up. It did pick up VRF's from the pair of ASR1002 -- Regards, Darius _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Not to mention that neither of them are presented on the Kickstarter supporters list, despite apparently having enough money to afford sup2ts :)
adam.
On 2013-05-02 18:37, Tom Laermans wrote:
Better start complaining to Cisco then; read carfully what Adam is saying.
If VRFs are discovered on 7k6 but not on 6k5, it's not Observium's fault, but buggy IOS... ;)
Tom
On 2/05/2013 19:34, Darius Seroka wrote:
I agree with Kris here, lots of vrfs out there on these things. I don't mind in the end, its not a critical feature but a nice to have. Theres more important things to be done at the moment.
-- Regards, Darius Jan Seroka dariusjs@gmail.com
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: Tell Cisco. :D
Kristoffer Björk kristoffer.bjork@gmail.com wrote:
Not to be rude but there are alot of people doing routing with multiple VRF's in the 6500, with sup720 and sup2T etc it's actually quite nice as a router. I find it's much more common then the ASR's in enterprise networks that i've been working in.
Cheers. //K
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote: 6500? Why, that's a switch! No need for qa'd vrf snmp support there!
Muwhahaha.
Darius Seroka dariusjs@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,
Has anyone got a Cisco 6500 series on observium with VRF's? I've recently been adding some cisco gear to observium and the vrf's don't get picked up. It did pick up VRF's from the pair of ASR1002
-- Regards, Darius _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [1]
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [1]
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [1]
Links:
[1] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Hi,
Better start complaining to Cisco then; read carfully what Adam is saying.
If VRFs are discovered on 7k6 but not on 6k5, it's not Observium's fault, but buggy IOS... ;)
Very true. I'll compare the 7600's and 6500's I'm working on for a customer as soon as I get the chance. Unfortunately I'll be traveling for the next three weeks, so don't hold your breath :-)
Cheers, Sander
Hi,
Tell Cisco. :D
Kristoffer Björk kristoffer.bjork@gmail.com wrote:
Not to be rude but there are alot of people doing routing with multiple VRF's in the 6500, with sup720 and sup2T etc it's actually quite nice as a router. I find it's much more common then the ASR's in enterprise networks that i've been working in.
I agree. The c6500 is a router with switching functions. It does many things like MPLS, VRFs, OSPF, BGP and, well, routing. Classifying it as a switch is a mistake. It might once have been the idea at Cisco but it never worked. The gap between the 6500 and the 7600 is closing and treating one as a switch and the other as a router doesn't make sense anymore.
Cheers, Sander
participants (4)
-
Adam Armstrong -
Darius Seroka -
Sander Steffann -
Tom Laermans