Is building groups broken? Can't get it to work.
Hello
Running 18.8.9360 (3rd August 2018).
Noticed that “groups” have gotten a sweet ass looking upgrade! =))) Nice one!
But I have issues when building the groups. Thought it had to do with the “,” and “|” as separator, since that seems to have changed under the hood. So I tried to recreate an old rule and make the new one just like the old one. But when building it i end up at a blank page with the "Building groups memberships” heading. Nothing happens and when I refresh the page no sensors are in the group.
Am I missing something? Picture of the old working group and the new one I made.
What did I do wrong?
[cid:6BC76FC6-6363-4298-A519-392F95B7C800]
Old working rule. “|” as separator of hostnames under “association ruleset” but “,” once you enter the edit mode. Is this expeted behaviour?
[cid:7E5BC9FB-7903-4C44-9913-9EAAE8A360C9]
Cheers and thanks
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
These are both new style, one has just been migrated to the new style from the old.
I'm fairly sure the new format actually uses an array to store the options with "IN", so when we display it we're not actually showing you how it's stored, but just using a human readable format.
It is odd that these options aren't being split into proper selection by the JavaScript though, perhaps something is broken elsewhere...
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 3 Aug 2018, 12:21, at 12:21, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" henrik.cednert@filmlance.se wrote:
Hello
Running 18.8.9360 (3rd August 2018).
Noticed that “groups” have gotten a sweet ass looking upgrade! =))) Nice one!
But I have issues when building the groups. Thought it had to do with the “,” and “|” as separator, since that seems to have changed under the hood. So I tried to recreate an old rule and make the new one just like the old one. But when building it i end up at a blank page with the "Building groups memberships” heading. Nothing happens and when I refresh the page no sensors are in the group.
Am I missing something? Picture of the old working group and the new one I made.
What did I do wrong?
[cid:6BC76FC6-6363-4298-A519-392F95B7C800]
Old working rule. “|” as separator of hostnames under “association ruleset” but “,” once you enter the edit mode. Is this expeted behaviour?
[cid:7E5BC9FB-7903-4C44-9913-9EAAE8A360C9]
Cheers and thanks
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Ah. Okay. I looked in the logs in the observing/logs folder but couldn’t find any clues there.
But if I understand you correctly, at the moment it might be broken and there’s not much I can do at my end?
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54tel:+%2046%20704%2071%2089%2054 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 14:23, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
These are both new style, one has just been migrated to the new style from the old.
I'm fairly sure the new format actually uses an array to store the options with "IN", so when we display it we're not actually showing you how it's stored, but just using a human readable format.
It is odd that these options aren't being split into proper selection by the JavaScript though, perhaps something is broken elsewhere...
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 12:21, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Hello
Running 18.8.9360 (3rd August 2018).
Noticed that “groups” have gotten a sweet ass looking upgrade! =))) Nice one!
But I have issues when building the groups. Thought it had to do with the “,” and “|” as separator, since that seems to have changed under the hood. So I tried to recreate an old rule and make the new one just like the old one. But when building it i end up at a blank page with the "Building groups memberships” heading. Nothing happens and when I refresh the page no sensors are in the group.
Am I missing something? Picture of the old working group and the new one I made.
What did I do wrong?
[cid:6BC76FC6-6363-4298-A519-392F95B7C800]
Old working rule. “|” as separator of hostnames under “association ruleset” but “,” once you enter the edit mode. Is this expeted behaviour?
[cid:7E5BC9FB-7903-4C44-9913-9EAAE8A360C9]
Cheers and thanks
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
________________________________
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Hi,
It should not currently be broken. I was just assuming it was user error ;)
I'll take a look when I get back to a computer!
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 3 Aug 2018, 18:02, at 18:02, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" henrik.cednert@filmlance.se wrote:
Ah. Okay. I looked in the logs in the observing/logs folder but couldn’t find any clues there.
But if I understand you correctly, at the moment it might be broken and there’s not much I can do at my end?
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54tel:+%2046%20704%2071%2089%2054 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 14:23, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
These are both new style, one has just been migrated to the new style from the old.
I'm fairly sure the new format actually uses an array to store the options with "IN", so when we display it we're not actually showing you how it's stored, but just using a human readable format.
It is odd that these options aren't being split into proper selection by the JavaScript though, perhaps something is broken elsewhere...
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 12:21, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Hello
Running 18.8.9360 (3rd August 2018).
Noticed that “groups” have gotten a sweet ass looking upgrade! =))) Nice one!
But I have issues when building the groups. Thought it had to do with the “,” and “|” as separator, since that seems to have changed under the hood. So I tried to recreate an old rule and make the new one just like the old one. But when building it i end up at a blank page with the "Building groups memberships” heading. Nothing happens and when I refresh the page no sensors are in the group.
Am I missing something? Picture of the old working group and the new one I made.
What did I do wrong?
[cid:6BC76FC6-6363-4298-A519-392F95B7C800]
Old working rule. “|” as separator of hostnames under “association ruleset” but “,” once you enter the edit mode. Is this expeted behaviour?
[cid:7E5BC9FB-7903-4C44-9913-9EAAE8A360C9]
Cheers and thanks
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Try retyping the list, putting a space between each entry.
I can't quite test the JS from here.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMail
On 3 Aug 2018, 18:02, at 18:02, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" henrik.cednert@filmlance.se wrote:
Ah. Okay. I looked in the logs in the observing/logs folder but couldn’t find any clues there.
But if I understand you correctly, at the moment it might be broken and there’s not much I can do at my end?
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54tel:+%2046%20704%2071%2089%2054 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 14:23, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
These are both new style, one has just been migrated to the new style from the old.
I'm fairly sure the new format actually uses an array to store the options with "IN", so when we display it we're not actually showing you how it's stored, but just using a human readable format.
It is odd that these options aren't being split into proper selection by the JavaScript though, perhaps something is broken elsewhere...
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 12:21, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Hello
Running 18.8.9360 (3rd August 2018).
Noticed that “groups” have gotten a sweet ass looking upgrade! =))) Nice one!
But I have issues when building the groups. Thought it had to do with the “,” and “|” as separator, since that seems to have changed under the hood. So I tried to recreate an old rule and make the new one just like the old one. But when building it i end up at a blank page with the "Building groups memberships” heading. Nothing happens and when I refresh the page no sensors are in the group.
Am I missing something? Picture of the old working group and the new one I made.
What did I do wrong?
[cid:6BC76FC6-6363-4298-A519-392F95B7C800]
Old working rule. “|” as separator of hostnames under “association ruleset” but “,” once you enter the edit mode. Is this expeted behaviour?
[cid:7E5BC9FB-7903-4C44-9913-9EAAE8A360C9]
Cheers and thanks
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Didn’t work either. Just having one hostname works though. Will play a bit more with it.
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 19:33, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
Try retyping the list, putting a space between each entry.
I can't quite test the JS from here.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 18:02, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Ah. Okay. I looked in the logs in the observing/logs folder but couldn’t find any clues there.
But if I understand you correctly, at the moment it might be broken and there’s not much I can do at my end?
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54tel:+%2046%20704%2071%2089%2054 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 14:23, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
These are both new style, one has just been migrated to the new style from the old.
I'm fairly sure the new format actually uses an array to store the options with "IN", so when we display it we're not actually showing you how it's stored, but just using a human readable format.
It is odd that these options aren't being split into proper selection by the JavaScript though, perhaps something is broken elsewhere...
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 12:21, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Hello
Running 18.8.9360 (3rd August 2018).
Noticed that “groups” have gotten a sweet ass looking upgrade! =))) Nice one!
But I have issues when building the groups. Thought it had to do with the “,” and “|” as separator, since that seems to have changed under the hood. So I tried to recreate an old rule and make the new one just like the old one. But when building it i end up at a blank page with the "Building groups memberships” heading. Nothing happens and when I refresh the page no sensors are in the group.
Am I missing something? Picture of the old working group and the new one I made.
What did I do wrong?
[cid:6BC76FC6-6363-4298-A519-392F95B7C800]
Old working rule. “|” as separator of hostnames under “association ruleset” but “,” once you enter the edit mode. Is this expeted behaviour?
[cid:7E5BC9FB-7903-4C44-9913-9EAAE8A360C9]
Cheers and thanks
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
________________________________
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
________________________________
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Yes, I noticed it worked with just one hostname.
The "intended" method of doing this is actually to have multiple hostname equals lines.
Still, it should be expanding these, I'll have to see why it isn't, since that's annoying.
Mike might know why the JavaScript isn't turning the comma/space separated elements into individual values
Adam
Sent from BlueMail
On 3 Aug 2018, 21:04, at 21:04, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" henrik.cednert@filmlance.se wrote:
Didn’t work either. Just having one hostname works though. Will play a bit more with it.
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 19:33, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
Try retyping the list, putting a space between each entry.
I can't quite test the JS from here.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 18:02, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Ah. Okay. I looked in the logs in the observing/logs folder but couldn’t find any clues there.
But if I understand you correctly, at the moment it might be broken and there’s not much I can do at my end?
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54tel:+%2046%20704%2071%2089%2054 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 14:23, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
These are both new style, one has just been migrated to the new style from the old.
I'm fairly sure the new format actually uses an array to store the options with "IN", so when we display it we're not actually showing you how it's stored, but just using a human readable format.
It is odd that these options aren't being split into proper selection by the JavaScript though, perhaps something is broken elsewhere...
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 12:21, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Hello
Running 18.8.9360 (3rd August 2018).
Noticed that “groups” have gotten a sweet ass looking upgrade! =))) Nice one!
But I have issues when building the groups. Thought it had to do with the “,” and “|” as separator, since that seems to have changed under the hood. So I tried to recreate an old rule and make the new one just like the old one. But when building it i end up at a blank page with the "Building groups memberships” heading. Nothing happens and when I refresh the page no sensors are in the group.
Am I missing something? Picture of the old working group and the new one I made.
What did I do wrong?
[cid:6BC76FC6-6363-4298-A519-392F95B7C800]
Old working rule. “|” as separator of hostnames under “association ruleset” but “,” once you enter the edit mode. Is this expeted behaviour?
[cid:7E5BC9FB-7903-4C44-9913-9EAAE8A360C9]
Cheers and thanks
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
The only way i can get it to work is to break it down like this. Sort of makes sense, but as you mention still odd… Especially the old rules, when edited, looks like previous screenshots.
But for now I’ll build it up like this. =)
[cid:A1A82D2C-E271-4E46-9785-A96A4C817486]
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 22:06, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
Yes, I noticed it worked with just one hostname.
The "intended" method of doing this is actually to have multiple hostname equals lines.
Still, it should be expanding these, I'll have to see why it isn't, since that's annoying.
Mike might know why the JavaScript isn't turning the comma/space separated elements into individual values
Adam
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 21:04, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Didn’t work either. Just having one hostname works though. Will play a bit more with it.
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 19:33, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
Try retyping the list, putting a space between each entry.
I can't quite test the JS from here.
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 18:02, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Ah. Okay. I looked in the logs in the observing/logs folder but couldn’t find any clues there.
But if I understand you correctly, at the moment it might be broken and there’s not much I can do at my end?
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54tel:+%2046%20704%2071%2089%2054 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
On 3 Aug 2018, at 14:23, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
These are both new style, one has just been migrated to the new style from the old.
I'm fairly sure the new format actually uses an array to store the options with "IN", so when we display it we're not actually showing you how it's stored, but just using a human readable format.
It is odd that these options aren't being split into proper selection by the JavaScript though, perhaps something is broken elsewhere...
Adam.
Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r?b=13187 On 3 Aug 2018, at 12:21, "Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)" <henrik.cednert@filmlance.semailto:henrik.cednert@filmlance.se> wrote: Hello
Running 18.8.9360 (3rd August 2018).
Noticed that “groups” have gotten a sweet ass looking upgrade! =))) Nice one!
But I have issues when building the groups. Thought it had to do with the “,” and “|” as separator, since that seems to have changed under the hood. So I tried to recreate an old rule and make the new one just like the old one. But when building it i end up at a blank page with the "Building groups memberships” heading. Nothing happens and when I refresh the page no sensors are in the group.
Am I missing something? Picture of the old working group and the new one I made.
What did I do wrong?
[cid:6BC76FC6-6363-4298-A519-392F95B7C800]
Old working rule. “|” as separator of hostnames under “association ruleset” but “,” once you enter the edit mode. Is this expeted behaviour?
[cid:7E5BC9FB-7903-4C44-9913-9EAAE8A360C9]
Cheers and thanks
-- Henrik Cednert / + 46 704 71 89 54 / CTO / Filmlance Disclaimer, the hideous bs disclaimer at the bottom is forced, sorry. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
________________________________
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
________________________________
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
________________________________
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
participants (2)
-
Adam Armstrong -
Henrik Cednert (Filmlance)