
Hi
I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach?
If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don't send alerts?
Hermes J. Martinez
Asistente De Sistemas
mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 http://www.pueblobonito.com/ www.pueblobonito.com.mx
http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito
Connect with us
https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito
https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about
https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort
https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/
http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/
Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo?
Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal

Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
On 9 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Hermes J. Martinez hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx wrote:
Hi
I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach?
If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don’t send alerts?
<image007.png>
Hermes J. Martinez ASISTENTE DE SISTEMAS hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 www.pueblobonito.com http://www.pueblobonito.com/.mx <image001.jpg> Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape Connect with us <image002.jpg> https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito <image003.jpg> https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about <image004.jpg> https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort <image005.jpg> https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/ <image006.jpg> http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/
Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo?
Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

About 9000 orders of magnitude easier said than a configuration interface for this sort of thing is created.
adam. On 2018-02-10 10:25:27, Simon Mousey Smith simonsmith5521@gmail.com wrote: Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
On 9 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Hermes J. Martinez <hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx [mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx]> wrote:
Hi I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach? If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don’t send alerts? <image007.png> Hermes J. Martinez ASISTENTE DE SISTEMAS hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx [mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx] (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 www.pueblobonito.com [http://www.pueblobonito.com/%5D.mx <image001.jpg> Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito [http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape] Connect with us <image002.jpg> [https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito] <image003.jpg> [https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about] <image004.jpg> [https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort] <image005.jpg> [https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/] <image006.jpg> [http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/] Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo? Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal [http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal] _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]

So why not exclude the VMs from the CPU alerting checker's device or entity match? ;-)
I guess it also depends on the virtualization tech used (if you can't distinguish by hostname), but for example many of my VMs have "QEMU Virtual version 1.0" as description for the CPU, which I could exclude.
Tom
On 2/10/2018 11:25 AM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
On 9 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Hermes J. Martinez <hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx> wrote:
Hi I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach? If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don’t send alerts? <image007.png> Hermes J. Martinez ASISTENTE DE SISTEMAS
hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 www.pueblobonito.com http://www.pueblobonito.com/.mx
<image001.jpg>
Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape
Connect with us
<image002.jpg> https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito
<image003.jpg> https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about
<image004.jpg> https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort
<image005.jpg> https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/
<image006.jpg> http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/
Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo?
Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal
observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

So you think I should create 2 CPU alert checks then?
One for the host machines
One for the VMs?
Simon
On 11 Feb 2018, at 11:53, Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx wrote:
So why not exclude the VMs from the CPU alerting checker's device or entity match? ;-)
I guess it also depends on the virtualization tech used (if you can't distinguish by hostname), but for example many of my VMs have "QEMU Virtual version 1.0" as description for the CPU, which I could exclude.
Tom
On 2/10/2018 11:25 AM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
On 9 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Hermes J. Martinez <hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx> wrote:
Hi
I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach?
If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don’t send alerts?
<image007.png>
Hermes J. Martinez ASISTENTE DE SISTEMAS
hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 www.pueblobonito.com http://www.pueblobonito.com/.mx <image001.jpg>
Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape
Connect with us <image002.jpg> https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito <image003.jpg> https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about <image004.jpg> https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort <image005.jpg> https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/ <image006.jpg> http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/
Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo?
Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

I... seemed to infer from your message you only wanted one of these 2 ...?
Tom
On 2/11/2018 1:27 PM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
So you think I should create 2 CPU alert checks then?
One for the host machines
One for the VMs?
Simon
On 11 Feb 2018, at 11:53, Tom Laermans <tom.laermans@powersource.cx mailto:tom.laermans@powersource.cx> wrote:
So why not exclude the VMs from the CPU alerting checker's device or entity match? ;-)
I guess it also depends on the virtualization tech used (if you can't distinguish by hostname), but for example many of my VMs have "QEMU Virtual version 1.0" as description for the CPU, which I could exclude.
Tom
On 2/10/2018 11:25 AM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon

But of course you should only really be alerting on the "average" pseudo entity... :D
Alerting on individual cores is craaaaaaaazzyyyyyyyyyy
adam. On 2018-02-11 11:54:08, Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx wrote: So why not exclude the VMs from the CPU alerting checker's device or entity match? ;-)
I guess it also depends on the virtualization tech used (if you can't distinguish by hostname), but for example many of my VMs have "QEMU Virtual version 1.0" as description for the CPU, which I could exclude.
Tom
On 2/10/2018 11:25 AM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
On 9 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Hermes J. Martinez <hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx [mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx]> wrote:
Hi I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach? If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don’t send alerts? <image007.png> Hermes J. Martinez ASISTENTE DE SISTEMAS
hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx [mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx] (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 www.pueblobonito.com [http://www.pueblobonito.com/%5D.mx <image001.jpg>
Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito [http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape]
Connect with us <image002.jpg> [https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito] <image003.jpg> [https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about] <image004.jpg> [https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort] <image005.jpg> [https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/] <image006.jpg> [http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/] Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo? Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal [http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal] _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]

Problem with the ‘Average' is its only visible if the device has MORE than 1 core
Our mikrotik switches only have 1 core, so it only shows a single CPU and don't show an AVERAGE cpu :(
Simon
On 11 Feb 2018, at 18:46, Adam Armstrong adama@observium.org wrote:
But of course you should only really be alerting on the "average" pseudo entity... :D
Alerting on individual cores is craaaaaaaazzyyyyyyyyyy
adam.
On 2018-02-11 11:54:08, Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx wrote:
So why not exclude the VMs from the CPU alerting checker's device or entity match? ;-)
I guess it also depends on the virtualization tech used (if you can't distinguish by hostname), but for example many of my VMs have "QEMU Virtual version 1.0" as description for the CPU, which I could exclude.
Tom
On 2/10/2018 11:25 AM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
On 9 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Hermes J. Martinez <hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx> wrote:
Hi
I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach?
If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don’t send alerts?
<image007.png>
Hermes J. Martinez ASISTENTE DE SISTEMAS
hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 www.pueblobonito.com http://www.pueblobonito.com/.mx <image001.jpg>
Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape
Connect with us <image002.jpg> https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito <image003.jpg> https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about <image004.jpg> https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort <image005.jpg> https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/ <image006.jpg> http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/
Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo?
Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

It's only visible on Linux/Windows devices which use HOST-RESOURCES-MIB On 2018-02-11 19:15:32, Simon Mousey Smith simonsmith5521@gmail.com wrote: Problem with the ‘Average' is its only visible if the device has MORE than 1 core
Our mikrotik switches only have 1 core, so it only shows a single CPU and don't show an AVERAGE cpu :(
Simon
On 11 Feb 2018, at 18:46, Adam Armstrong <adama@observium.org [mailto:adama@observium.org]> wrote:
But of course you should only really be alerting on the "average" pseudo entity... :D
Alerting on individual cores is craaaaaaaazzyyyyyyyyyy
adam. On 2018-02-11 11:54:08, Tom Laermans <tom.laermans@powersource.cx [mailto:tom.laermans@powersource.cx]> wrote: So why not exclude the VMs from the CPU alerting checker's device or entity match? ;-)
I guess it also depends on the virtualization tech used (if you can't distinguish by hostname), but for example many of my VMs have "QEMU Virtual version 1.0" as description for the CPU, which I could exclude.
Tom
On 2/10/2018 11:25 AM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
On 9 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Hermes J. Martinez <hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx [mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx]> wrote:
Hi I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach? If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don’t send alerts? <image007.png> Hermes J. Martinez ASISTENTE DE SISTEMAS
hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx [mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx] (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 www.pueblobonito.com [http://www.pueblobonito.com/%5D.mx <image001.jpg>
Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito [http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape]
Connect with us <image002.jpg> [https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito] <image003.jpg> [https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about] <image004.jpg> [https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort] <image005.jpg> [https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/] <image006.jpg> [http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/] Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo? Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal [http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal] _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Dam you Mikrotik !
Why you no use HOST-RESOURCES-MIB !?
Simon
On 11 Feb 2018, at 19:21, Adam Armstrong adama@observium.org wrote:
It's only visible on Linux/Windows devices which use HOST-RESOURCES-MIB
On 2018-02-11 19:15:32, Simon Mousey Smith simonsmith5521@gmail.com wrote:
Problem with the ‘Average' is its only visible if the device has MORE than 1 core
Our mikrotik switches only have 1 core, so it only shows a single CPU and don't show an AVERAGE cpu :(
Simon
On 11 Feb 2018, at 18:46, Adam Armstrong <adama@observium.org mailto:adama@observium.org> wrote:
But of course you should only really be alerting on the "average" pseudo entity... :D
Alerting on individual cores is craaaaaaaazzyyyyyyyyyy
adam.
On 2018-02-11 11:54:08, Tom Laermans <tom.laermans@powersource.cx mailto:tom.laermans@powersource.cx> wrote:
So why not exclude the VMs from the CPU alerting checker's device or entity match? ;-)
I guess it also depends on the virtualization tech used (if you can't distinguish by hostname), but for example many of my VMs have "QEMU Virtual version 1.0" as description for the CPU, which I could exclude.
Tom
On 2/10/2018 11:25 AM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
On 9 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Hermes J. Martinez <hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx> wrote:
Hi
I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach?
If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don’t send alerts?
<image007.png>
Hermes J. Martinez ASISTENTE DE SISTEMAS
hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 www.pueblobonito.com http://www.pueblobonito.com/.mx <image001.jpg>
Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape
Connect with us <image002.jpg> https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito <image003.jpg> https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about <image004.jpg> https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort <image005.jpg> https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/ <image006.jpg> http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/
Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo?
Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

note that this can easily be solved with multiple association rules (and is why multiple rules are possible)
have one locked to linux/windows that matches average only, and one that excludes linux/windows that matches everything.
le done On 2018-02-11 19:52:57, Simon Mousey Smith simonsmith5521@gmail.com wrote: Dam you Mikrotik !
Why you no use HOST-RESOURCES-MIB !?
Simon
On 11 Feb 2018, at 19:21, Adam Armstrong <adama@observium.org [mailto:adama@observium.org]> wrote:
It's only visible on Linux/Windows devices which use HOST-RESOURCES-MIB On 2018-02-11 19:15:32, Simon Mousey Smith <simonsmith5521@gmail.com [mailto:simonsmith5521@gmail.com]> wrote: Problem with the ‘Average' is its only visible if the device has MORE than 1 core
Our mikrotik switches only have 1 core, so it only shows a single CPU and don't show an AVERAGE cpu :(
Simon
On 11 Feb 2018, at 18:46, Adam Armstrong <adama@observium.org [mailto:adama@observium.org]> wrote:
But of course you should only really be alerting on the "average" pseudo entity... :D
Alerting on individual cores is craaaaaaaazzyyyyyyyyyy
adam. On 2018-02-11 11:54:08, Tom Laermans <tom.laermans@powersource.cx [mailto:tom.laermans@powersource.cx]> wrote: So why not exclude the VMs from the CPU alerting checker's device or entity match? ;-)
I guess it also depends on the virtualization tech used (if you can't distinguish by hostname), but for example many of my VMs have "QEMU Virtual version 1.0" as description for the CPU, which I could exclude.
Tom
On 2/10/2018 11:25 AM, Simon Mousey Smith wrote:
Hi,
I have a similar issue at the moment with notifications for High CPU usage
We monitor a VM which has high CPU, but we also monitor the VM host machine which has high CPU because of that VM
And im getting double notifications for the high CPU usage
It would be handy to say dont send alerts for high cpu usage for the VM as the host machine will send the alerts for high cpu usage
Regards
Simon
On 9 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Hermes J. Martinez <hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx [mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx]> wrote:
Hi I Have a Question, I was looking in the documentation for something that can help me, but maybe I don't search with the correct words, there is a way to make something similar to that I Put in the image attach? If One Switch goes down.. The other switches behind it, don’t send alerts? <image007.png> Hermes J. Martinez ASISTENTE DE SISTEMAS
hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx [mailto:hermes.martinez@pueblobonito.com.mx] (669) 989-8900 | EXT 8656 www.pueblobonito.com [http://www.pueblobonito.com/%5D.mx <image001.jpg>
Read about the Real Escape at Pueblo Bonito [http://www.pueblobonito.com/real-escape]
Connect with us <image002.jpg> [https://twitter.com/PuebloBonito] <image003.jpg> [https://plus.google.com/103008660176547960870/about] <image004.jpg> [https://www.facebook.com/PuebloBonitoResort] <image005.jpg> [https://www.instagram.com/pueblobonito/] <image006.jpg> [http://www.pueblobonito.com/blog/] Do you really need to print this e-mail? En realidad necesita imprimir este correo? Aviso Legal / Legal Notice http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal [http://img.pueblobonito.com.mx/legal] _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (4)
-
Adam Armstrong
-
Hermes J. Martinez
-
Simon Mousey Smith
-
Tom Laermans