![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/52aa44884cc7a4f72f86f242a4af44c6.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
The integrated smokeping graphs don't have the same appearance as they do in smokeping itself. Is there a way to make the graphs have the same appearance?
Also, the data represented in Observium doesn't appear to match smokeping when looking at the variance. I've attached examples. I realize that it's the same rrd being drawn but it's just the representation of the data that is different.
Smokeping 2.6.8 and Observium 0.14.10.5883
Justin
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4154df7dfe987573bd64685b61399a04.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Yes, Observium just reads Smokeping's rrd files. Once developers reported, that they won't provide more support for Smokeping rrds parsing. For me current level of integration with Smokeping is useless - it just mimics info of graphs, generated in Poller - Ping Response. четверг, 16 октября 2014г., 01:52 +0400 от Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net: The integrated smokeping graphs don't have the same appearance as they do in smokeping itself. Is there a way to make the graphs have the same appearance? Also, the data represented in Observium doesn't appear to match smokeping when looking at the variance. I've attached examples. I realize that it's the same rrd being drawn but it's just the representation of the data that is different. Smokeping 2.6.8 and Observium 0.14.10.5883 Justin _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (2)
-
Justin Miller
-
Сережка Хомяков