No, they are being detected as 32bit. How can I fix that?

Thanks.

Regards Alasdair MacLeod Senior Technician

[NewarkWirelessFullLogo]

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD www.jhcs.comhttp://www.jhcs.com/|Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571 ****************************************************************************************** The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and may not represent those of the company. This e-mail is subject to copyright and the information in it is confidential. This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the express written permission of the sender. If you have received this e-mail in error you may not copy, forward or use the contents, attachments or information in any way. Although any attachments to this e-mail have been virus checked, the sender cannot accept liability in respect of any virus which has not been detected. JHCS Ltd (Reg. No. 04742418) (VAT. No. 657914987) ******************************************************************************************

From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 24 December 2015 12:55 To: Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Hi,

115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit?

(See device > properties > ports)

Tom On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com> wrote: Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium. Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing. One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks. Regards Alasdair MacLeod Senior Technician

[NewarkWirelessFullLogo]

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD www.jhcs.comhttp://www.jhcs.com/|Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571 ****************************************************************************************** The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and may not represent those of the company. This e-mail is subject to copyright and the information in it is confidential. This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the express written permission of the sender. If you have received this e-mail in error you may not copy, forward or use the contents, attachments or information in any way. Although any attachments to this e-mail have been virus checked, the sender cannot accept liability in respect of any virus which has not been detected. JHCS Ltd (Reg. No. 04742418) (VAT. No. 657914987) ******************************************************************************************

Hi Tom Laermans

Just to update. I found that I was running SNMP V1 on the CCR. Changed it to V2 and observium now sees 64bit counters on the ports.

I let it graph for a few days and see how it goes.

Thanks.

Regards Alasdair MacLeod Senior Technician

[NewarkWirelessFullLogo]

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD www.jhcs.comhttp://www.jhcs.com/|Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571 ****************************************************************************************** The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and may not represent those of the company. This e-mail is subject to copyright and the information in it is confidential. This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the express written permission of the sender. If you have received this e-mail in error you may not copy, forward or use the contents, attachments or information in any way. Although any attachments to this e-mail have been virus checked, the sender cannot accept liability in respect of any virus which has not been detected. JHCS Ltd (Reg. No. 04742418) (VAT. No. 657914987) ******************************************************************************************

From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Alasdair MacLeod Sent: 24 December 2015 13:11 To: Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

No, they are being detected as 32bit. How can I fix that?

Thanks.

Regards Alasdair MacLeod Senior Technician

[NewarkWirelessFullLogo]

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD www.jhcs.comhttp://www.jhcs.com/|Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571 ****************************************************************************************** The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and may not represent those of the company. This e-mail is subject to copyright and the information in it is confidential. This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the express written permission of the sender. If you have received this e-mail in error you may not copy, forward or use the contents, attachments or information in any way. Although any attachments to this e-mail have been virus checked, the sender cannot accept liability in respect of any virus which has not been detected. JHCS Ltd (Reg. No. 04742418) (VAT. No. 657914987) ******************************************************************************************

From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 24 December 2015 12:55 To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Hi,

115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit?

(See device > properties > ports)

Tom On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com> wrote: Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium. Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing. One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks. Regards Alasdair MacLeod Senior Technician

[NewarkWirelessFullLogo]

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD www.jhcs.comhttp://www.jhcs.com/|Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571 ****************************************************************************************** The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and may not represent those of the company. This e-mail is subject to copyright and the information in it is confidential. This e-mail, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the express written permission of the sender. If you have received this e-mail in error you may not copy, forward or use the contents, attachments or information in any way. Although any attachments to this e-mail have been virus checked, the sender cannot accept liability in respect of any virus which has not been detected. JHCS Ltd (Reg. No. 04742418) (VAT. No. 657914987) ******************************************************************************************

This is a long time bug in Mikrotik, software-devices are 32-bit only.

-- Eduardo Schoedler

2015-12-24 11:11 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

No, they are being detected as 32bit. How can I fix that?

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod* Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Tom Laermans *Sent:* 24 December 2015 12:55 *To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Hi,

115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit?

(See device > properties > ports)

Tom

On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com wrote:

Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium. Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing. One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod* Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

Try this:

$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pppoe-/'; $config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pptp-/';

2015-12-24 11:33 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

Observium also detects all the PPPoE connections as interfaces (not ports).

Is it possible to tell observium to ignore all Ports / Interfaces excluding those I stipulate?

At the moment, on this router im testing with, it has picked up over 800 additional interfaces which I don’t care about. Im concerned that this will be causing it to do way more work than necessary. If I then add in another 60 odd routers and it does the same to them all, it may cause the workload to be too great.

Thanks.

Al

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 13:27

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

This is a long time bug in Mikrotik, software-devices are 32-bit only.

--

Eduardo Schoedler

2015-12-24 11:11 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

No, they are being detected as 32bit. How can I fix that?

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Tom Laermans *Sent:* 24 December 2015 12:55 *To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Hi,

115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit?

(See device > properties > ports)

Tom

On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com wrote:

Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium. Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing. One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

All configuration you have to do in the config.php! :)

2015-12-24 12:45 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

Hi Eduardo,

Where do I add this?

Config.php?

Where is the default location for this?

Thanks.

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 13:37

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Try this:

$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pppoe-/'; $config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pptp-/';

2015-12-24 11:33 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

Observium also detects all the PPPoE connections as interfaces (not ports).

Is it possible to tell observium to ignore all Ports / Interfaces excluding those I stipulate?

At the moment, on this router im testing with, it has picked up over 800 additional interfaces which I don’t care about. Im concerned that this will be causing it to do way more work than necessary. If I then add in another 60 odd routers and it does the same to them all, it may cause the workload to be too great.

Thanks.

Al

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 13:27

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

This is a long time bug in Mikrotik, software-devices are 32-bit only.

--

Eduardo Schoedler

2015-12-24 11:11 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

No, they are being detected as 32bit. How can I fix that?

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Tom Laermans *Sent:* 24 December 2015 12:55 *To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Hi,

115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit?

(See device > properties > ports)

Tom

On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com wrote:

Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium. Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing. One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

--

Eduardo Schoedler

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Did you run discovery and poller again?

2015-12-24 13:37 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

I made the change but unfortunately it did not resolve the issue L

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 15:33

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

All configuration you have to do in the config.php! :)

2015-12-24 12:45 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

Hi Eduardo,

Where do I add this?

Config.php?

Where is the default location for this?

Thanks.

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 13:37

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Try this:

$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pppoe-/'; $config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pptp-/';

2015-12-24 11:33 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

Observium also detects all the PPPoE connections as interfaces (not ports).

Is it possible to tell observium to ignore all Ports / Interfaces excluding those I stipulate?

At the moment, on this router im testing with, it has picked up over 800 additional interfaces which I don’t care about. Im concerned that this will be causing it to do way more work than necessary. If I then add in another 60 odd routers and it does the same to them all, it may cause the workload to be too great.

Thanks.

Al

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 13:27

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

This is a long time bug in Mikrotik, software-devices are 32-bit only.

--

Eduardo Schoedler

2015-12-24 11:11 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

No, they are being detected as 32bit. How can I fix that?

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Tom Laermans *Sent:* 24 December 2015 12:55 *To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Hi,

115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit?

(See device > properties > ports)

Tom

On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com wrote:

Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium. Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing. One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

--

Eduardo Schoedler

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

--

Eduardo Schoedler

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Ports are only removed during discovery.

You'll then need to purge them from the deleted ports page at the bottom of the ports menu.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

On 24 Dec 2015, 15:42, at 15:42, Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com wrote:

No, I just rebooted the server!

Let me try that. From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Schoedler Sent: 24 December 2015 15:40 To: Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Did you run discovery and poller again?

2015-12-24 13:37 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com>: I made the change but unfortunately it did not resolve the issue ☹

From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.orgmailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Schoedler Sent: 24 December 2015 15:33

To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

All configuration you have to do in the config.php! :)

2015-12-24 12:45 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com>: Hi Eduardo,

Where do I add this?

Config.php?

Where is the default location for this?

Thanks. From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.orgmailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Schoedler Sent: 24 December 2015 13:37

To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Try this:

$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pppoe-/'; $config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pptp-/';

2015-12-24 11:33 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com>: Observium also detects all the PPPoE connections as interfaces (not ports).

Is it possible to tell observium to ignore all Ports / Interfaces excluding those I stipulate?

At the moment, on this router im testing with, it has picked up over 800 additional interfaces which I don’t care about. Im concerned that this will be causing it to do way more work than necessary. If I then add in another 60 odd routers and it does the same to them all, it may cause the workload to be too great.

Thanks.

Al

From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.orgmailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Schoedler Sent: 24 December 2015 13:27

To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

This is a long time bug in Mikrotik, software-devices are 32-bit only.

-- Eduardo Schoedler

2015-12-24 11:11 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com>: No, they are being detected as 32bit. How can I fix that?

Thanks.

Regards Alasdair MacLeod Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD www.jhcs.comhttp://www.jhcs.com/|Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20682%20244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20704%20571

From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.orgmailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 24 December 2015 12:55 To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Hi,

115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit?

(See device > properties > ports)

Tom On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com> wrote: Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium. Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing. One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks. Regards Alasdair MacLeod Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD www.jhcs.comhttp://www.jhcs.com/|Alasdair@jhcs.commailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20682%20244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20704%20571

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

-- Eduardo Schoedler

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

-- Eduardo Schoedler

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

-- Eduardo Schoedler

---

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Rebooting has largely zero effect on Observium, since there is no in-memory state.

You need to rediscover the device you're trying to change the ports for :

./discovery.php -h <device> -m ports

adam.

Sent from Mailbird [http://www.getmailbird.com/?utm_source=Mailbird&utm_medium=email&utm...] On 24/12/2015 16:12:51, Alasdair MacLeod alasdair@jhcs.com wrote: I rebooted to ensure the new config was applied.

I assume there is a better way to do this?

If this was discussed earlier today, I apologise.  I only joined this today.   From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: 24 December 2015 15:56 To: Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput   Ports are only removed during discovery. You'll then need to purge them from the deleted ports page at the bottom of the ports menu. Adam. Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r] On 24 Dec 2015, at 15:42, Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.com [mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com]> wrote: No, I just rebooted the server!

Let me try that. From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Eduardo Schoedler Sent: 24 December 2015 15:40 To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput   Did you run discovery and poller again?   2015-12-24 13:37 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.com [mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com]>: I made the change but unfortunately it did not resolve the issue L       From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Eduardo Schoedler Sent: 24 December 2015 15:33

To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput   All configuration you have to do in the config.php! :)   2015-12-24 12:45 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.com [mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com]>: Hi Eduardo,

Where do I add this?   Config.php?    Where is the default location for this?   Thanks. From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Eduardo Schoedler Sent: 24 December 2015 13:37

To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput   Try this:

$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pppoe-/'; $config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pptp-/';       2015-12-24 11:33 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.com [mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com]>: Observium also detects all the PPPoE connections as interfaces (not ports).

Is it possible to tell observium to ignore all Ports / Interfaces excluding those I stipulate?   At the moment, on this router im testing with, it has picked up over 800 additional interfaces which I don’t care about.  Im concerned that this will be causing it to do way more work than necessary.  If I then add in another 60 odd routers and it does the same to them all, it may cause the workload to be too great.

Thanks.   Al   From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Eduardo Schoedler Sent: 24 December 2015 13:27

To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput   This is a long time bug in Mikrotik, software-devices are 32-bit only.   -- Eduardo Schoedler     2015-12-24 11:11 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.com [mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com]>: No, they are being detected as 32bit.  How can I fix that?   Thanks.   Regards Alasdair MacLeod Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD www.jhcs.com [http://www.jhcs.com/%5D%7CAlasdair@jhcs.com [mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature]

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 [tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20682%20244] Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571 [tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20704%20571]     From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org]] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 24 December 2015 12:55 To: Observium Network Observation System <observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org]> Subject: Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput   Hi, 115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit? (See device > properties > ports) Tom On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.com [mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com]> wrote: Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium.  Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing.  One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.   Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.   Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks. Regards Alasdair MacLeod Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD www.jhcs.com [http://www.jhcs.com/%5D%7CAlasdair@jhcs.com [mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature]

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 [tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20682%20244] Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571 [tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20704%20571]

_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]

-- Eduardo Schoedler

_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]

-- Eduardo Schoedler

_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]

-- Eduardo Schoedler

observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]

Forget reboot, you don't need.

2015-12-24 14:12 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

I rebooted to ensure the new config was applied.

I assume there is a better way to do this?

If this was discussed earlier today, I apologise. I only joined this today.

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Adam Armstrong *Sent:* 24 December 2015 15:56

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Ports are only removed during discovery.

You'll then need to purge them from the deleted ports page at the bottom of the ports menu.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r

On 24 Dec 2015, at 15:42, Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com wrote:

No, I just rebooted the server!

Let me try that.

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 15:40 *To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Did you run discovery and poller again?

2015-12-24 13:37 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

I made the change but unfortunately it did not resolve the issue L

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 15:33

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

All configuration you have to do in the config.php! :)

2015-12-24 12:45 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

Hi Eduardo,

Where do I add this?

Config.php?

Where is the default location for this?

Thanks.

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 13:37

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Try this:

$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pppoe-/'; $config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pptp-/';

2015-12-24 11:33 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

Observium also detects all the PPPoE connections as interfaces (not ports).

Is it possible to tell observium to ignore all Ports / Interfaces excluding those I stipulate?

At the moment, on this router im testing with, it has picked up over 800 additional interfaces which I don’t care about. Im concerned that this will be causing it to do way more work than necessary. If I then add in another 60 odd routers and it does the same to them all, it may cause the workload to be too great.

Thanks.

Al

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 13:27

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

This is a long time bug in Mikrotik, software-devices are 32-bit only.

--

Eduardo Schoedler

2015-12-24 11:11 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

No, they are being detected as 32bit. How can I fix that?

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Tom Laermans *Sent:* 24 December 2015 12:55 *To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Hi,

115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit?

(See device > properties > ports)

Tom

On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com wrote:

Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium. Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing. One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

--

Eduardo Schoedler

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

--

Eduardo Schoedler

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

--

Eduardo Schoedler

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Adam,

Those lines is working for me :).

2015-12-24 13:48 GMT-02:00 Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org:

Those lines will not help.

Tom already explained how to do it earlier this morning using array_diff

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r

On 24 Dec 2015, at 13:37, Eduardo Schoedler listas@esds.com.br wrote:

...

Try this:

$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pppoe-/'; $config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pptp-/';

2015-12-24 11:33 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

...

Observium also detects all the PPPoE connections as interfaces (not ports).

Is it possible to tell observium to ignore all Ports / Interfaces excluding those I stipulate?

At the moment, on this router im testing with, it has picked up over 800 additional interfaces which I don’t care about. Im concerned that this will be causing it to do way more work than necessary. If I then add in another 60 odd routers and it does the same to them all, it may cause the workload to be too great.

Thanks.

Al

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduardo Schoedler *Sent:* 24 December 2015 13:27

*To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

This is a long time bug in Mikrotik, software-devices are 32-bit only.

--

Eduardo Schoedler

2015-12-24 11:11 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com:

No, they are being detected as 32bit. How can I fix that?

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

*From:* observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *On Behalf Of *Tom Laermans *Sent:* 24 December 2015 12:55 *To:* Observium Network Observation System observium@observium.org *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show lower throughput

Hi,

115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports being detected as 64bit?

(See device > properties > ports)

Tom

On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod Alasdair@jhcs.com wrote:

Hi Guys,

I just started using Observium. Everything looks great except our CCRs are showing much lower throughput on the interfaces than they are actually passing. One interface is passing a fairly consistent 300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

Any pointers on this would be great.

Thanks.

Regards

*Alasdair MacLeod *Senior Technician

Newark Wireless JHCS Ltd 27-29 Kirkgate Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

www.jhcs.com|Alasdair@jhcs.com <Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244 Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

-- Eduardo Schoedler

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Different thread... Here we don't want to remove ATM from ignores, but add PPTP ones ;-)

PS: rebooting the server? what for? :O

On 24/12/2015 16:48, Adam Armstrong wrote:

Those lines will not help.

Tom already explained how to do it earlier this morning using array_diff

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r

On 24 Dec 2015, at 13:37, Eduardo Schoedler <listas@esds.com.br mailto:listas@esds.com.br> wrote:

Try this:

$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pppoe-/';
$config['bad_if_regexp'][] = '/^.pptp-/';



2015-12-24 11:33 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.com
<mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com>>:

    Observium also detects all the PPPoE connections as interfaces
    (not ports).

    Is it possible to tell observium to ignore all Ports /
    Interfaces excluding those I stipulate?

    At the moment, on this router im testing with, it has picked
    up over 800 additional interfaces which I don’t care about. 
    Im concerned that this will be causing it to do way more work
    than necessary.  If I then add in another 60 odd routers and
    it does the same to them all, it may cause the workload to be
    too great.


    Thanks.

    Al

    *From:*observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org
    <mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org>] *On Behalf Of
    *Eduardo Schoedler
    *Sent:* 24 December 2015 13:27


    *To:* Observium Network Observation System
    <observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org>>
    *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs show
    lower throughput

    This is a long time bug in Mikrotik, software-devices are
    32-bit only.

    --

    Eduardo Schoedler

    2015-12-24 11:11 GMT-02:00 Alasdair MacLeod <Alasdair@jhcs.com
    <mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com>>:

        No, they are being detected as 32bit.  How can I fix that?

        Thanks.

        Regards

        */Alasdair MacLeod
        /*Senior Technician


        Newark Wireless
        JHCS Ltd
        27-29 Kirkgate Newark,
        Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

        www.jhcs.com <http://www.jhcs.com/>|Alasdair@jhcs.com
        <mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

        Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244
        <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20682%20244>
        Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571
        <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20704%20571>

        *From:*observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org
        <mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org>] *On Behalf Of
        *Tom Laermans
        *Sent:* 24 December 2015 12:55
        *To:* Observium Network Observation System
        <observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org>>
        *Subject:* Re: [Observium] MikroTik CCR interface graphs
        show lower throughput

        Hi,

        115Mbit is the limit for 32bit counters, are the ports
        being detected as 64bit?

        (See device > properties > ports)

        Tom

        On Dec 24, 2015 1:39 PM, Alasdair MacLeod
        <Alasdair@jhcs.com <mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com>> wrote:

            Hi Guys,


            I just started using Observium.  Everything looks
            great except our CCRs are showing much lower
            throughput on the interfaces than they are actually
            passing.  One interface is passing a fairly consistent
            300-400Mbps but Observium graphs it as 100-130Mbps.

            Cacti graphs the same interface on the same device
            correctly so I don’t think it’s the router, I think I
            must have set something up incorrectly within Observium.

            Any pointers on this would be great.


            Thanks.

            Regards

            */Alasdair MacLeod
            /*Senior Technician

            Newark Wireless
            JHCS Ltd
            27-29 Kirkgate Newark,
            Nottinghamshire, NG24 1AD

            www.jhcs.com <http://www.jhcs.com/>|Alasdair@jhcs.com
            <mailto:Alasdair@jhcs.com?subject=email%20sent%20by%20reply%20from%20email%20signature>

            Tel | +44 (0) 1636 682 244
            <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20682%20244>
            Fax | +44 (0) 1636 704 571
            <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%201636%20704%20571>


    _______________________________________________
    observium mailing list
    observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org>
    http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium




-- 
Eduardo Schoedler

------------------------------------------------------------------------

observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium