Sorry, i think its false negative;) maybe simple tuning of function - "if the first char is non number, then ignore" would protect from such cases

On Friday, December 22, 2017, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:

I've never seen a false positive like that, how on earth has that device managed to confuse simple numerical tests?

I suspect it's injecting a strange character before or after the number or something.

There isn't any way for this to happen, really, unless the device is returning a strange invisible character before or after the number... Oo

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=11558 On 22 Dec 2017, at 14:59, Edvinas K <edvinas.email <%3Ca>@gmail.com target=_blank>edvinas.email@gmail.com> wrote:

...

[image: Inline image 1] Hello,

Is there any explanation - why this alert came up ?

From device sensors info now i see this information:

[image: Inline image 2]

The NX-OS stack (again) sent wrong condition information and alert generated by the "greater than 0" rule ?

Is there are the way to minimaze these false positives ?

Thank you.

---

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium