Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
WHY AM I GETTING THESE EMAILS?
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Justin Miller Sent: 02 December 2014 15:59 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
ffs Adam, put BIG flashing button "SALES, BUY NOW! LIMITED SUPPLY" on front page of site.
Otherwise I dunno why I'm getting these emails too. :-D
On 02/12/14 19:00, Katie Dutton wrote:
WHY AM I GETTING THESE EMAILS?
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Justin Miller Sent: 02 December 2014 15:59 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
We should give away a free russian-accented toy hamster with every purchase!
------ Original Message ------ From: "Nikolay Shopik" shopik@inblock.ru To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/2/2014 10:07:17 AM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
ffs Adam, put BIG flashing button "SALES, BUY NOW! LIMITED SUPPLY" on front page of site.
Otherwise I dunno why I'm getting these emails too. :-D
On 02/12/14 19:00, Katie Dutton wrote:
WHY AM I GETTING THESE EMAILS?
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Justin Miller Sent: 02 December 2014 15:59 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
She wanted to buy a subscription so she searched the site and found this page: http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists.
And clicked Observium-scubscribe.
All completely logical from a procurement point of view.
And worth every minute of the confusion.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 10:23 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs [*EXTERNAL*]
We should give away a free russian-accented toy hamster with every purchase!
------ Original Message ------ From: "Nikolay Shopik" shopik@inblock.ru To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/2/2014 10:07:17 AM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
ffs Adam, put BIG flashing button "SALES, BUY NOW! LIMITED SUPPLY" on front page of site.
Otherwise I dunno why I'm getting these emails too. :-D
On 02/12/14 19:00, Katie Dutton wrote:
WHY AM I GETTING THESE EMAILS?
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Justin Miller Sent: 02 December 2014 15:59 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
You requested to get these e-mails, which is why you're getting them.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Katie Dutton" kdutton@asmtech.com To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:00:42 AM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
WHY AM I GETTING THESE EMAILS?
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Justin Miller Sent: 02 December 2014 15:59 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
So much for agile it solutions, can't even work a mailing list
On 02/12/2014 16:30, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Aw, bless her heart.
Regards,
SG
On 12/2/2014 9:38 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
So much for agile it solutions, can't even work a mailing list
On 02/12/2014 16:30, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Well, then magic happened and you got subscribed to the mailing list.
Either you count on magic taking you off again or you follow the directions I posted below.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:46 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/234/765/b7e.jpg
On 02/12/2014 16:48, Tom Laermans wrote:
Well, then magic happened and you got subscribed to the mailing list.
Either you count on magic taking you off again or you follow the directions I posted below.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:46 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote: > > Hello, > > i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most > of my graphs have dropouts. > > The poller runs not longer than a minute. > > `Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s' > > Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same > physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. > Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz > container (turnkeylinux). > > > I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my > setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
I have done this :) Are you always this nice
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:48 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Well, then magic happened and you got subscribed to the mailing list.
Either you count on magic taking you off again or you follow the directions I posted below.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:46 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
not everyones a techie - some mailing-list admin may be kind to her and take her out of the labyrinth. she tried it. so be amiable :-)
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 17:46 schrieb Katie Dutton kdutton@asmtech.com:
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
Katie Dutton | Sales Support
Thank you
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:53 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
not everyones a techie - some mailing-list admin may be kind to her and take her out of the labyrinth. she tried it. so be amiable :-)
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 17:46 schrieb Katie Dutton kdutton@asmtech.com:
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
Katie Dutton | Sales Support
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
but this is a very techie list, so one would expect that requesting to join... that you're a techie.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "ecaroh" lists@datenarbeiter.de To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:52:34 AM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
not everyones a techie - some mailing-list admin may be kind to her and take her out of the labyrinth. she tried it. so be amiable :-)
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 17:46 schrieb Katie Dutton kdutton@asmtech.com:
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
Katie Dutton | Sales Support
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Ignoring non-text/plain MIME parts You are already subscribed! Is what it is telling me
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: Katie Dutton Sent: 02 December 2014 16:47 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: RE: [Observium] gaps in graphs
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Send a single email to observium-leave@observium.org from the email address you'd like removed. This should remove you.
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:48:25 AM Katie Dutton kdutton@asmtech.com wrote:
Ignoring non-text/plain MIME parts You are already subscribed! Is what it is telling me
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: Katie Dutton Sent: 02 December 2014 16:47 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: RE: [Observium] gaps in graphs
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies
Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments.
ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an
openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results
in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.net
:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values
did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of
my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same
physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup.
Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Thank you
Katie Dutton Sales Support
[cid:image1974bf.GIF@a8a5ec62.4f8de534]
t +44 (0)1606 863707 a ASM Technologies, , Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom e kdutton@asmtech.commailto:kdutton@asmtech.com w www.asmtech.comhttp://www.asmtech.com
follow us [cid:image581163.GIF@39b98720.46bb2da5] http://www.linkedin.com/company/1531389?trk=NUS_CMPY_FOL-pdctd [cid:imagec9c42b.GIF@4f5ddad6.4584a7a1] https://twitter.com/ASMTechnologies
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies Limited is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Richard Sent: 02 December 2014 16:51 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Send a single email to observium-leave@observium.orgmailto:observium-leave@observium.org from the email address you'd like removed. This should remove you. On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:48:25 AM Katie Dutton <kdutton@asmtech.commailto:kdutton@asmtech.com> wrote: Ignoring non-text/plain MIME parts You are already subscribed! Is what it is telling me
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.commailto:kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.comhttp://www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: Katie Dutton Sent: 02 December 2014 16:47 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: RE: [Observium] gaps in graphs
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.orgmailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.orgmailto:observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.commailto:kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.comhttp://www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.orgmailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.netmailto:observium@dynstatic.net>:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh <lists@datenarbeiter.demailto:lists@datenarbeiter.de> wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.netmailto:observium@dynstatic.net>:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh <lists@datenarbeiter.demailto:lists@datenarbeiter.de> wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Oh, it's -leave? I thought it was -unsubscribe.
There's only one mailman admin right now and I know he's in bed with the flu; hence my suggestion of solving it in the regular way :-)
On 12/02/2014 05:51 PM, Richard wrote:
Send a single email to observium-leave@observium.org mailto:observium-leave@observium.org from the email address you'd like removed. This should remove you.
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:48:25 AM Katie Dutton <kdutton@asmtech.com mailto:kdutton@asmtech.com> wrote:
Ignoring non-text/plain MIME parts You are already subscribed! Is what it is telling me Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com <mailto:kdutton@asmtech.com> www.asmtech.com <http://www.asmtech.com> Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443. -----Original Message----- From: Katie Dutton Sent: 02 December 2014 16:47 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: RE: [Observium] gaps in graphs I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed: -----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org <mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org>] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs Hi Katie, You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org <mailto:observium-subscribe@observium.org>. This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended. You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe. Tom On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote: > STOP EMAILING ME!! > > > > Katie Dutton | Sales Support > +44 (0)1606 863707 > kdutton@asmtech.com <mailto:kdutton@asmtech.com> > www.asmtech.com <http://www.asmtech.com> > > > Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, > Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom > > ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of > this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not > that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please > notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute > it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, > whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. > ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443. > > -----Original Message----- > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org <mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org>] On Behalf Of > ecaroh > Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 > To: Observium Network Observation System > Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs > > > Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem. > > ecaroh > > Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.net <mailto:observium@dynstatic.net>>: > >> Free up disk IO >> >> >>> On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh <lists@datenarbeiter.de <mailto:lists@datenarbeiter.de>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas? >>> >>> I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens. >>> >>> >>> ecaroh >>> >>> >>> Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.net <mailto:observium@dynstatic.net>>: >>> >>>> When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it. >>>> >>>> Justin >>>> >>>>> On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh <lists@datenarbeiter.de <mailto:lists@datenarbeiter.de>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts. >>>>> >>>>> The poller runs not longer than a minute. >>>>> >>>>> `Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s' >>>>> >>>>> Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me? > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
According to the mailman docs, its -leave. Though any rational person would setup unsubscribe as well.
http://www.list.org/mailman-member/node14.html On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:56:02 AM Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx wrote:
Oh, it's -leave? I thought it was -unsubscribe.
There's only one mailman admin right now and I know he's in bed with the flu; hence my suggestion of solving it in the regular way :-)
On 12/02/2014 05:51 PM, Richard wrote:
Send a single email to observium-leave@observium.org from the email address you'd like removed. This should remove you.
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:48:25 AM Katie Dutton kdutton@asmtech.com wrote:
Ignoring non-text/plain MIME parts You are already subscribed! Is what it is telling me
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: Katie Dutton Sent: 02 December 2014 16:47 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: RE: [Observium] gaps in graphs
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies
Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments.
ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an
openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
Free up disk IO
On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results
in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.net
:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values
did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote: > > Hello, > > i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of
my graphs have dropouts.
> > The poller runs not longer than a minute. > > `Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s' > > Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same
physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
> > > I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my
setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
I'll admit I was too lazy to look it up and improvised ;)
On 12/02/2014 05:57 PM, Richard wrote:
According to the mailman docs, its -leave. Though any rational person would setup unsubscribe as well.
http://www.list.org/mailman-member/node14.html On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:56:02 AM Tom Laermans <tom.laermans@powersource.cx mailto:tom.laermans@powersource.cx> wrote:
Oh, it's -leave? I thought it was -unsubscribe. There's only one mailman admin right now and I know he's in bed with the flu; hence my suggestion of solving it in the regular way :-) On 12/02/2014 05:51 PM, Richard wrote:Send a single email to observium-leave@observium.org <mailto:observium-leave@observium.org> from the email address you'd like removed. This should remove you. On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:48:25 AM Katie Dutton <kdutton@asmtech.com <mailto:kdutton@asmtech.com>> wrote: Ignoring non-text/plain MIME parts You are already subscribed! Is what it is telling me Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com <mailto:kdutton@asmtech.com> www.asmtech.com <http://www.asmtech.com> Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443. -----Original Message----- From: Katie Dutton Sent: 02 December 2014 16:47 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: RE: [Observium] gaps in graphs I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed: -----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org <mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org>] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs Hi Katie, You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org <mailto:observium-subscribe@observium.org>. This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended. You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe. Tom On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote: > STOP EMAILING ME!! > > > > Katie Dutton | Sales Support > +44 (0)1606 863707 > kdutton@asmtech.com <mailto:kdutton@asmtech.com> > www.asmtech.com <http://www.asmtech.com> > > > Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, > Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom > > ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of > this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not > that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please > notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute > it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, > whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. > ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443. > > -----Original Message----- > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org <mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org>] On Behalf Of > ecaroh > Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 > To: Observium Network Observation System > Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs > > > Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem. > > ecaroh > > Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.net <mailto:observium@dynstatic.net>>: > >> Free up disk IO >> >> >>> On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh <lists@datenarbeiter.de <mailto:lists@datenarbeiter.de>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas? >>> >>> I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens. >>> >>> >>> ecaroh >>> >>> >>> Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller <observium@dynstatic.net <mailto:observium@dynstatic.net>>: >>> >>>> When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it. >>>> >>>> Justin >>>> >>>>> On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh <lists@datenarbeiter.de <mailto:lists@datenarbeiter.de>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts. >>>>> >>>>> The poller runs not longer than a minute. >>>>> >>>>> `Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s' >>>>> >>>>> Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me? > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
I removed her from the list.
What silliness!
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Tom Laermans" tom.laermans@powersource.cx To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/2/2014 10:59:06 AM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
I'll admit I was too lazy to look it up and improvised ;)
On 12/02/2014 05:57 PM, Richard wrote:
According to the mailman docs, its -leave. Though any rational person would setup unsubscribe as well.
http://www.list.org/mailman-member/node14.html On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:56:02 AM Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx wrote:
Oh, it's -leave? I thought it was -unsubscribe.
There's only one mailman admin right now and I know he's in bed with the flu; hence my suggestion of solving it in the regular way :-)
On 12/02/2014 05:51 PM, Richard wrote:
Send a single email to observium-leave@observium.org from the email address you'd like removed. This should remove you.
On Tue Dec 02 2014 at 9:48:25 AM Katie Dutton kdutton@asmtech.com wrote:
Ignoring non-text/plain MIME parts You are already subscribed! Is what it is telling me
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the content of this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and not that of the company. Should you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or distribute it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments. ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: Katie Dutton Sent: 02 December 2014 16:47 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: RE: [Observium] gaps in graphs
I didn’t email saying subscribe, i have and it is saying Unprocessed:
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Tom Laermans Sent: 02 December 2014 16:45 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi Katie,
You subscribed yourself to the Observium user mailing list by sending email to observium-subscribe@observium.org.
This address is only documented on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists - so we're not sure how you got here if it wasn't intended.
You can unsubscribe through the same address, but with unsubscribe instead of subscribe.
Tom
On 12/02/2014 05:30 PM, Katie Dutton wrote:
STOP EMAILING ME!!
Katie Dutton | Sales Support +44 (0)1606 863707 kdutton@asmtech.com www.asmtech.com
Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford Industrial Estate, Winsford, Cheshire, Cheshire, CW7 3QG, United Kingdom, United Kingdom
ASM Technologies Limited cannot be held responsible for the
content of
this email as it may reflect the personal view of the sender and
not
that of the company. Should you receive this email in error,
please
notify the sender immediately and do not disclose, copy or
distribute
it. Any unauthorised disclosure, copying or use of the message, whether in whole or part, is strictly prohibited. ASM
Technologies Limited runs anti-virus software on all servers and all workstations; it cannot be held responsible for any infected files that you may receive. ASM Technologies Limited advises all recipients to virus scan any file attachments.
ASM Technologies is a registered company in England No: 2753443.
-----Original Message----- From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On
Behalf Of
ecaroh Sent: 02 December 2014 16:30 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Could it be concerning to the fact that observium is running on
an openvz container? The machine is not under heavy load and is doing less jobs. so i didn't consider disk io as a problem.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:59 schrieb Justin Miller
> Free up disk IO > > >> On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:41 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de
wrote:
>> >> >> Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp
results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
>> >> I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what
happens.
>> >> >> ecaroh >> >> >> Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller
>> >>> When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it.
Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
>>> >>> Justin >>> >>>> On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de
wrote:
>>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen
most of my graphs have dropouts.
>>>> >>>> The poller runs not longer than a minute. >>>> >>>> `Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s' >>>> >>>> Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same
physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
>>>> >>>> >>>> I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my
setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
******************************** ******************************** ******************************** ******************************** DO NOT USE SNMP v1 ******************************** ******************************** ******************************** ******************************** ********************************
------ Original Message ------ From: "ecaroh" lists@datenarbeiter.de To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/2/2014 9:41:38 AM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Unfortunately i already have v2c. Setting it from udp to tcp results in switching back to udp in the web gui. Any other ideas?
I will try to set one test host back to v1 and see what happens.
ecaroh
Am 02.12.2014 um 16:03 schrieb Justin Miller observium@dynstatic.net:
When I had this issue, switching the SNMP version fixed it. Values did not get picked up with 64bit counters correctly. I believe I was using version v1 and v2c fixed it.
Justin
On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:33 AM, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
Can you send (to the list) your cron entry for the observium poller please?
I had a similar issue that turned out to be caused by a single device taking way too long to complete the poll (lots of interfaces - not an issue with the poller itself) and changed my poller-wrapper.py settings to the following:
0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * * root /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py 32 >> /dev/null 2>&1
Check your config and see if you only have '1' after 'poller-wrapper.py' - it may be worth adjusting as per the notes on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Performance_tuning.
Adam
________________________________________ From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of ecaroh [lists@datenarbeiter.de] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 5:41 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
-- ecaroh
PS: I run smokeping on the same machine with integration in observium. There are no gaps.
Am 10.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Ole Hansen oha@netic.dk:
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
-- Ole Hansen
On 01/12/2014, at 15.33, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
You realise that "*/5" as-documented is identical to "0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55", right?
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Adam Burgess" adam@qant.com To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/10/2014 5:16:18 PM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Can you send (to the list) your cron entry for the observium poller please?
I had a similar issue that turned out to be caused by a single device taking way too long to complete the poll (lots of interfaces - not an issue with the poller itself) and changed my poller-wrapper.py settings to the following:
0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * * root/opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py 32 >> /dev/null 2>&1
Check your config and see if you only have '1' after 'poller-wrapper.py' - it may be worth adjusting as per the notes on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Performance_tuning.
Adam
From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of ecaroh [lists@datenarbeiter.de] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 5:41 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
-- ecaroh
PS: I run smokeping on the same machine with integration in observium. There are no gaps.
Am 10.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Ole Hansen oha@netic.dk:
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
-- Ole Hansen
On 01/12/2014, at 15.33, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Yes ... the machine that I copied this from is built from the Turnkey Linux Observium OVA and this is just the pre-existing setting that I have not bothered to change.
Adam ________________________________________ From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 9:25 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
You realise that "*/5" as-documented is identical to "0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55", right?
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Adam Burgess" adam@qant.com To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/10/2014 5:16:18 PM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Can you send (to the list) your cron entry for the observium poller please?
I had a similar issue that turned out to be caused by a single device taking way too long to complete the poll (lots of interfaces - not an issue with the poller itself) and changed my poller-wrapper.py settings to the following:
0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * * root/opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py 32 >> /dev/null 2>&1
Check your config and see if you only have '1' after 'poller-wrapper.py' - it may be worth adjusting as per the notes on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Performance_tuning.
Adam
From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of ecaroh [lists@datenarbeiter.de] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 5:41 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
-- ecaroh
PS: I run smokeping on the same machine with integration in observium. There are no gaps.
Am 10.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Ole Hansen oha@netic.dk:
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
-- Ole Hansen
On 01/12/2014, at 15.33, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
yes, poller-wrapper.py was set to 1 in observium config. My machine is a turnkey appliance to. I changed it now to 5. I will post it when the result is clear in a couple of days.
thanks - ecaroh
Am 11.12.2014 um 00:27 schrieb Adam Burgess adam@qant.com:
Yes ... the machine that I copied this from is built from the Turnkey Linux Observium OVA and this is just the pre-existing setting that I have not bothered to change.
Adam ________________________________________ From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 9:25 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
You realise that "*/5" as-documented is identical to "0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55", right?
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Adam Burgess" adam@qant.com To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/10/2014 5:16:18 PM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Can you send (to the list) your cron entry for the observium poller please?
I had a similar issue that turned out to be caused by a single device taking way too long to complete the poll (lots of interfaces - not an issue with the poller itself) and changed my poller-wrapper.py settings to the following:
0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * * root/opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py 32 >> /dev/null 2>&1
Check your config and see if you only have '1' after 'poller-wrapper.py' - it may be worth adjusting as per the notes on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Performance_tuning.
Adam
From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of ecaroh [lists@datenarbeiter.de] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 5:41 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
-- ecaroh
PS: I run smokeping on the same machine with integration in observium. There are no gaps.
Am 10.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Ole Hansen oha@netic.dk:
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
-- Ole Hansen
On 01/12/2014, at 15.33, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Derp, 1 basically means "don't use poller wrapper but use the getting started configuration not intended for production use".
Who makes these things?!
They don't understand what they're doing, can't follow docs, don't know how cron works.. what's next? They put nginx as web server?
On 11/12/2014 08:43, ecaroh wrote:
yes, poller-wrapper.py was set to 1 in observium config. My machine is a turnkey appliance to. I changed it now to 5. I will post it when the result is clear in a couple of days.
thanks - ecaroh
Am 11.12.2014 um 00:27 schrieb Adam Burgess adam@qant.com:
Yes ... the machine that I copied this from is built from the Turnkey Linux Observium OVA and this is just the pre-existing setting that I have not bothered to change.
Adam ________________________________________ From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of Adam Armstrong [adama@memetic.org] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 9:25 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
You realise that "*/5" as-documented is identical to "0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55", right?
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "Adam Burgess" adam@qant.com To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/10/2014 5:16:18 PM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Can you send (to the list) your cron entry for the observium poller please?
I had a similar issue that turned out to be caused by a single device taking way too long to complete the poll (lots of interfaces - not an issue with the poller itself) and changed my poller-wrapper.py settings to the following:
0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * * root/opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py 32 >> /dev/null 2>&1
Check your config and see if you only have '1' after 'poller-wrapper.py' - it may be worth adjusting as per the notes on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Performance_tuning.
Adam
From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of ecaroh [lists@datenarbeiter.de] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 5:41 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
-- ecaroh
PS: I run smokeping on the same machine with integration in observium. There are no gaps.
Am 10.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Ole Hansen oha@netic.dk:
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
-- Ole Hansen
On 01/12/2014, at 15.33, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Ahh.. I was actually only having "1" after poller-wrapper.py - doh! why didn't i start with the performance tuning guide? :-)
I'll see if it changes anything.
1 completely negates the entire advantage of poller-wrapper, being that any one device can not bring your polling to a halt. :/
On 12/11/2014 12:12 PM, Ole Hansen wrote:
Ahh.. I was actually only having "1" after poller-wrapper.py - doh! why didn't i start with the performance tuning guide? :-)
I'll see if it changes anything.
-- Ole Hansen
On 11/12/2014, at 00.16, Adam Burgess <adam@qant.com mailto:adam@qant.com> wrote:
Can you send (to the list) your cron entry for the observium poller please?
I had a similar issue that turned out to be caused by a single device taking way too long to complete the poll (lots of interfaces - not an issue with the poller itself) and changed my poller-wrapper.py settings to the following:
0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * * root/opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py 32 >> /dev/null 2>&1
Check your config and see if you only have '1' after 'poller-wrapper.py' - it may be worth adjusting as per the notes on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Performance_tuning.
Adam
From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of ecaroh [lists@datenarbeiter.de mailto:lists@datenarbeiter.de] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 5:41 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
-- ecaroh
PS: I run smokeping on the same machine with integration in observium. There are no gaps.
Am 10.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Ole Hansen <oha@netic.dk mailto:oha@netic.dk>:
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
-- Ole Hansen
On 01/12/2014, at 15.33, ecaroh <lists@datenarbeiter.de mailto:lists@datenarbeiter.de> wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
yes, i had one cisco dsl router, which needs more than 3 minutes for itself. i deactived this device weeks ago. poller time is now near 1 minute. that should not be the problem with polling cycles. but in fact, one device can stop the show.
ecaroh
Am 11.12.2014 um 12:20 schrieb Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx:
1 completely negates the entire advantage of poller-wrapper, being that any one device can not bring your polling to a halt. :/
On 12/11/2014 12:12 PM, Ole Hansen wrote:
Ahh.. I was actually only having "1" after poller-wrapper.py - doh! why didn't i start with the performance tuning guide? :-)
I'll see if it changes anything.
-- Ole Hansen
On 11/12/2014, at 00.16, Adam Burgess adam@qant.com wrote:
Can you send (to the list) your cron entry for the observium poller please?
I had a similar issue that turned out to be caused by a single device taking way too long to complete the poll (lots of interfaces - not an issue with the poller itself) and changed my poller-wrapper.py settings to the following:
0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50,55 * * * * root /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py 32 >> /dev/null 2>&1Check your config and see if you only have '1' after 'poller-wrapper.py' - it may be worth adjusting as per the notes on http://www.observium.org/wiki/Performance_tuning.
Adam
From: observium [observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of ecaroh [lists@datenarbeiter.de] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2014 5:41 AM To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
-- ecaroh
PS: I run smokeping on the same machine with integration in observium. There are no gaps.
Am 10.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Ole Hansen oha@netic.dk:
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
-- Ole Hansen
On 01/12/2014, at 15.33, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list
observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Allowing the poller to run multiple times solved the problem - so far. Now I just need to find out, why polling of some devices takes a long time.
How is your poller configured to run in cron?
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "ecaroh" lists@datenarbeiter.de To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/10/2014 1:41:03 PM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
-- ecaroh
PS: I run smokeping on the same machine with integration in observium. There are no gaps.
Am 10.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Ole Hansen oha@netic.dk:
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
-- Ole Hansen
On 01/12/2014, at 15.33, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
root@of-srv-obs-1 /etc/cron.d# cat observium 14 */6 * * * root /opt/observium/discovery.php -h all >> /dev/null 2>&1 */5 * * * * root /opt/observium/discovery.php -h new >> /dev/null 2>&1 */5 * * * * root /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py 5 >> /dev/null 2>&1 root@of-srv-obs-1 /etc/cron.d#
but the `5' was `1' in standard turnkey linux.
i must admit, that i start with plain turnkey and did no tweaks. therefore i relied on a functionable start configuration. i have only 16 devices at the moment and did not suspect that it is necessary to tweak for such a low number.
thanks all for help!
ecaroh
Am 11.12.2014 um 09:58 schrieb Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org:
How is your poller configured to run in cron?
adam.
------ Original Message ------ From: "ecaroh" lists@datenarbeiter.de To: "Observium Network Observation System" observium@observium.org Sent: 12/10/2014 1:41:03 PM Subject: Re: [Observium] gaps in graphs
Hi,
no, unfortunately not. I can't explain it with disk io. There are to less machines monitored and the vz/kvm host is not overloaded. The only thing i can suspect is, that observium is running as a vz container and this causes problems.
Before anybody moans, I know that firewalls and monitoring system should stand alone. But cost for power and administrational overhead would be to much for my intended monitoring.
From other monitoring software i know that this can happen if the collector needs to long for a polling cycle. But i must admit, that i read about "multi" polling in observium. I have to check whether this is active. Another solution would be, to set up a physical test server.
I did not checked in deep for logs and other stuff, because my main job actually is CEO of a business center and not it staff as a couple of years before. But i will do it when i have some free time.
At the moment i have " Total time for all devices: 59.73s" for polling. This result does not point to polling problems.
If i find the solution, i will not keep it for me and post it here.
-- ecaroh
PS: I run smokeping on the same machine with integration in observium. There are no gaps.
Am 10.12.2014 um 14:28 schrieb Ole Hansen oha@netic.dk:
DId you find a solution for this? I'm seeing the same problem - and I'm collecting snmp from the same devices from another server (Zenoss distributed collector) on the same network with no drops in the graphs.
-- Ole Hansen
On 01/12/2014, at 15.33, ecaroh lists@datenarbeiter.de wrote:
Hello,
i got sporadic dropouts over all my graphs. If this happen most of my graphs have dropouts.
The poller runs not longer than a minute.
`Total time for all devices: 41.07s 35.17s'
Memory usage 200 of 1000 MB RAM. All devices are in the same physical gigabit network. Ping is less than 50 ms to each device. Monitored are only 16 devices. Observium itself runs as a openvz container (turnkeylinux).
I searched the web but does not find anything that matches my setup. Does anybody have a hint for me?
Thanks,
ecaroh
<observium_gaps-in-graph.png>
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
--
HTH
ecaroh
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (13)
-
Adam Armstrong -
Adam Burgess -
Crozier, Doug -
ecaroh -
Joe Holden -
Justin Miller -
Katie Dutton -
Mike Hammett -
Nikolay Shopik -
Ole Hansen -
Richard -
Spencer Gaw -
Tom Laermans