Sensors not picking up, get rediscovered 4 times a day
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX8021/Jun/12 12:39:04Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake21/Jun/12 12:39:04Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine21/Jun/12 12:39:03Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX8021/Jun/12 12:39:03Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*21/Jun/12 12:39:03Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*21/Jun/12 12:39:03Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is.
Let me fix it :)
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Hmm. Did tom not already fix this?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is.
Let me fix it :)
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on.
Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic.
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Hmm. Did tom not already fix this?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is.
Let me fix it :)
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Sounds like nonsense to me.
When did you last update?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:
The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on.
Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic.
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
Hmm. Did tom not already fix this? adam. On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is. Let me fix it :) adam. On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful. Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them. Is there a switch I need to flip? Thanks! Morgan 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday.
This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers
A server I have added does this:
2012-06-21 12:38:16 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz
an APC managed 0u strip looks like:
21/Jun/12 12:38:13Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output21/Jun/12 12:38:12Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input21/Jun/12 12:38:12Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input21/Jun/12 06:38:17Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output21/Jun/12 06:38:16Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input21/Jun/12 06:38:16Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input21/Jun/12 00:38:32Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output21/Jun/12 00:38:30Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input21/Jun/12 00:38:29Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input20/Jun/12 18:38:21Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Sounds like nonsense to me.
When did you last update?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:
The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on.
Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic.
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Hmm. Did tom not already fix this?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is.
Let me fix it :)
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled.
b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog
rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it.
adam.
On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:
I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday.
This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers
A server I have added does this:
2012-06-21 12:38:16SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz
an APC managed 0u strip looks like:
21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
Sounds like nonsense to me. When did you last update? adam. On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on. Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic. Morgan On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Hmm. Did tom not already fix this? adam. On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is. Let me fix it :) adam. On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful. Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them. Is there a switch I need to flip? Thanks! Morgan 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this *was* a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled.
b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog
rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it.
adam.
On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:
I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday.
This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers
A server I have added does this:
2012-06-21 12:38:16 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz
an APC managed 0u strip looks like:
21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
Sounds like nonsense to me.
When did you last update?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:
The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on.
Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic.
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
Hmm. Did tom not already fix this?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is.
Let me fix it :)
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Except for a few well-known and long-standing issues (alerting, mostly), most things you'll notice will be fixed before you notice them. :>
This is because the developers run the current release on their production systems, so we catch bugs pretty quickly. No one hates gaps in graphs more than we do. :D
adam.
On 22/06/2012 00:06, Morgan McLean wrote:
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this /was/ a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled. b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it. adam. On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday. This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers A server I have added does this: 2012-06-21 12:38:16SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz an APC managed 0u strip looks like: 21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Sounds like nonsense to me. When did you last update? adam. On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on. Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic. Morgan On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Hmm. Did tom not already fix this? adam. On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is. Let me fix it :) adam. On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful. Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them. Is there a switch I need to flip? Thanks! Morgan 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Except!
On 22/06/2012 1:12, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Except for a few well-known and long-standing issues (alerting, mostly), most things you'll notice will be fixed before you notice them. :>
This is because the developers run the current release on their production systems, so we catch bugs pretty quickly. No one hates gaps in graphs more than we do. :D
We didn't catch these because it's a bug adding new devices, and I haven't done that (consciously) in a while - or at least not since the memory tables commit ;)
Tom
I didn't touch sensors though, maybe that's still broken?
I did fix storage and processors.
Keep us posted if there's still something broken :-)
Tom
On 22/06/2012 1:06, Morgan McLean wrote:
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this /was/ a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled. b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it. adam. On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday. This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers A server I have added does this: 2012-06-21 12:38:16SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz an APC managed 0u strip looks like: 21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Sounds like nonsense to me. When did you last update? adam. On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on. Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic. Morgan On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Hmm. Did tom not already fix this? adam. On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is. Let me fix it :) adam. On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful. Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them. Is there a switch I need to flip? Thanks! Morgan 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
You did fix sensors, because when i went to fix it, it was already fixed, and i didn't do it :P
On 22/06/2012 00:13, Tom Laermans wrote:
I didn't touch sensors though, maybe that's still broken?
I did fix storage and processors.
Keep us posted if there's still something broken :-)
Tom
On 22/06/2012 1:06, Morgan McLean wrote:
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this /was/ a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled. b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it. adam. On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday. This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers A server I have added does this: 2012-06-21 12:38:16SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz an APC managed 0u strip looks like: 21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Sounds like nonsense to me. When did you last update? adam. On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on. Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic. Morgan On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Hmm. Did tom not already fix this? adam. On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is. Let me fix it :) adam. On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful. Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them. Is there a switch I need to flip? Thanks! Morgan 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/* 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Everything is looking much better! I was seeing a lot of weirdness before, everything is starting to click in. I'll let it run through a few poll cycles before I really comment. I'll post back here in a few.
-Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
You did fix sensors, because when i went to fix it, it was already fixed, and i didn't do it :P
On 22/06/2012 00:13, Tom Laermans wrote:
I didn't touch sensors though, maybe that's still broken?
I did fix storage and processors.
Keep us posted if there's still something broken :-)
Tom
On 22/06/2012 1:06, Morgan McLean wrote:
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this *was* a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled.
b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog
rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it.
adam.
On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:
I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday.
This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers
A server I have added does this:
2012-06-21 12:38:16 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz
an APC managed 0u strip looks like:
21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
Sounds like nonsense to me.
When did you last update?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:
The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on.
Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic.
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
Hmm. Did tom not already fix this?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is.
Let me fix it :)
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Ok, then my memory is worse off than I thought.... :D
On 22/06/2012 1:15, Adam Armstrong wrote:
You did fix sensors, because when i went to fix it, it was already fixed, and i didn't do it :P
On 22/06/2012 00:13, Tom Laermans wrote:
I didn't touch sensors though, maybe that's still broken?
I did fix storage and processors.
Keep us posted if there's still something broken :-)
Tom
On 22/06/2012 1:06, Morgan McLean wrote:
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this /was/ a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled. b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it. adam. On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday. This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers A server I have added does this: 2012-06-21 12:38:16SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz an APC managed 0u strip looks like: 21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Sounds like nonsense to me. When did you last update? adam. On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on. Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic. Morgan On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Hmm. Did tom not already fix this? adam. On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is. Let me fix it :) adam. On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:> My logs look like this...any idea why its not > picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC > device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to > monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen > some information about sensor configuration under > config.php, but it wasn't very helpful. > > Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the > poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for > every device, but it does nothing with them. > > Is there a switch I need to flip? > > Thanks! > Morgan > > > 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos > 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80 > > 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos > 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake > > 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos > 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine > > 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos > index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80 > > 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos > index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/* > > 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos > index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/* > > 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos > index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine > > > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
By the way...off topic.
http://observium.org/wiki/File:Yuno.jpg
this is perfect. :>
lol. Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cxwrote:
Ok, then my memory is worse off than I thought.... :D
On 22/06/2012 1:15, Adam Armstrong wrote:
You did fix sensors, because when i went to fix it, it was already fixed, and i didn't do it :P
On 22/06/2012 00:13, Tom Laermans wrote:
I didn't touch sensors though, maybe that's still broken?
I did fix storage and processors.
Keep us posted if there's still something broken :-)
Tom
On 22/06/2012 1:06, Morgan McLean wrote:
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this *was* a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled.
b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog
rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it.
adam.
On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:
I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday.
This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers
A server I have added does this:
2012-06-21 12:38:16 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz
an APC managed 0u strip looks like:
21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
Sounds like nonsense to me.
When did you last update?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:
The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on.
Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic.
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
Hmm. Did tom not already fix this?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is.
Let me fix it :)
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
it's the baby that did it. send it back.
On 22/06/2012 00:19, Tom Laermans wrote:
Ok, then my memory is worse off than I thought.... :D
On 22/06/2012 1:15, Adam Armstrong wrote:
You did fix sensors, because when i went to fix it, it was already fixed, and i didn't do it :P
On 22/06/2012 00:13, Tom Laermans wrote:
I didn't touch sensors though, maybe that's still broken?
I did fix storage and processors.
Keep us posted if there's still something broken :-)
Tom
On 22/06/2012 1:06, Morgan McLean wrote:
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this /was/ a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org> wrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled. b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it. adam. On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday. This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers A server I have added does this: 2012-06-21 12:38:16SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22SystemProcessor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz an APC managed 0u strip looks like: 21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output 21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input 20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Sounds like nonsense to me. When did you last update? adam. On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on. Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic. Morgan On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.org <mailto:adama@memetic.org>> wrote: Hmm. Did tom not already fix this? adam. On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:> Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere > (processors), and I think I know what it is. > > Let me fix it :) > > adam. > > On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote: >> My logs look like this...any idea why its not >> picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC >> device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to >> monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen >> some information about sensor configuration under >> config.php, but it wasn't very helpful. >> >> Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the >> poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for >> every device, but it does nothing with them. >> >> Is there a switch I need to flip? >> >> Thanks! >> Morgan >> >> >> 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos >> 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80 >> >> 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature >> junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake >> >> 21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature >> junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine >> >> 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos >> index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80 >> >> 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos >> index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/* >> >> 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos >> index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/* >> >> 21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos >> index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> observium mailing list >> observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org >> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > > > > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium@observium.org mailto:observium@observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Hey guys,
So I'm back :).
Everything has been going great with the sensors across the board now, but now its on to a new issue regarding the sensors. I get these every poll period from every PDU. Maybe its how the sensor threshold is being interpreted, or maybe the APC devices are giving bad values, but the event logs have been completely spammed with these messages.
Any ideas?
Morgan
2012-06-25 15:42:42pdu308-li-124http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=85/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 204 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:42 pdu306-ro-117 http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=80/SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 207 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:38pdu306-lo-115http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=78/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 206 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:37 pdu307-ri-122 http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=83/SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 205 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:33pdu307-li-120http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=81/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 208 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:31 pdu305-ro-113 http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=76/SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 206 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:29pdu306-ri-118http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=79/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 204 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:26 pdu305-lo-111 http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=74/SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 208 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:22pdu306-li-116http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=77/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 208 V (> -0.85 V) On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
it's the baby that did it. send it back.
On 22/06/2012 00:19, Tom Laermans wrote:
Ok, then my memory is worse off than I thought.... :D
On 22/06/2012 1:15, Adam Armstrong wrote:
You did fix sensors, because when i went to fix it, it was already fixed, and i didn't do it :P
On 22/06/2012 00:13, Tom Laermans wrote:
I didn't touch sensors though, maybe that's still broken?
I did fix storage and processors.
Keep us posted if there's still something broken :-)
Tom
On 22/06/2012 1:06, Morgan McLean wrote:
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this *was* a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled.
b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog
rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it.
adam.
On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:
I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday.
This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers
A server I have added does this:
2012-06-21 12:38:16 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz
an APC managed 0u strip looks like:
21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
Sounds like nonsense to me.
When did you last update?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:
The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on.
Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic.
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
Hmm. Did tom not already fix this?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is.
Let me fix it :)
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
Also, I can't seem to find the thread in my inbox right now, but for the VLAN numbers being wrong on juniper switches, I can provide a switch with SNMP access and some VLANs for testing if you'd like. I seem to recall one of you guys asking for access to one.
Thanks, Morgan
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Morgan McLean wrx230@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
So I'm back :).
Everything has been going great with the sensors across the board now, but now its on to a new issue regarding the sensors. I get these every poll period from every PDU. Maybe its how the sensor threshold is being interpreted, or maybe the APC devices are giving bad values, but the event logs have been completely spammed with these messages.
Any ideas?
Morgan
2012-06-25 15:42:42pdu308-li-124http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=85/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 204 V (> -0.85 V) 2012-06-25 15:42:42 pdu306-ro-117 http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=80/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 207 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:38 pdu306-lo-115http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=78/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 206 V (> -0.85 V) 2012-06-25 15:42:37 pdu307-ri-122 http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=83/SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 205 V (> -0.85 V) 2012-06-25 15:42:33pdu307-li-120http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=81/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 208 V (> -0.85 V) 2012-06-25 15:42:31 pdu305-ro-113 http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=76/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 206 V (> -0.85 V)2012-06-25 15:42:29 pdu306-ri-118http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=79/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 204 V (> -0.85 V) 2012-06-25 15:42:26 pdu305-lo-111 http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=74/SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 208 V (> -0.85 V) 2012-06-25 15:42:22pdu306-li-116http://pvmtest01.jigsaw.com/device/device=77/ SystemVoltage Input above threshold: 208 V (> -0.85 V)
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org wrote:
it's the baby that did it. send it back.
On 22/06/2012 00:19, Tom Laermans wrote:
Ok, then my memory is worse off than I thought.... :D
On 22/06/2012 1:15, Adam Armstrong wrote:
You did fix sensors, because when i went to fix it, it was already fixed, and i didn't do it :P
On 22/06/2012 00:13, Tom Laermans wrote:
I didn't touch sensors though, maybe that's still broken?
I did fix storage and processors.
Keep us posted if there's still something broken :-)
Tom
On 22/06/2012 1:06, Morgan McLean wrote:
I know it isn't compiled, I guess thats just habit from work :).
I wasn't even sure this *was* a bug when I emailed in, I thought maybe I didn't have a flag set. The documentation on sensors was a bit wonky.
I do see some notes regarding some of the things I mentioned, so I will svn update and see how that goes. Sorry, this project is more active than I originally thought!
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
a) there are no 'builds', observium is not compiled.
b) http://fisheye.observium.org/changelog
rule #1 of reporting bugs is that you make sure the bug isn't fixed before you report it.
adam.
On 21/06/2012 23:49, Morgan McLean wrote:
I checked out the most recent build from SVN monday or tuesday.
This is literally all juniper gear. EX switches, SRX firewalls, MX routers
A server I have added does this:
2012-06-21 12:38:16 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 06:38:20 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-21 00:38:34 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 18:38:25 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz 2012-06-20 12:38:22 System Processor added: type hr index 805 descr Intel Xeon E7540 @ 2.00GHz
an APC managed 0u strip looks like:
21/Jun/12 12:38:13 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 12:38:12 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:17 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 06:38:16 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:32 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output
21/Jun/12 00:38:30 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
21/Jun/12 00:38:29 Sensor Added: voltage apc 1 Input
20/Jun/12 18:38:21 Sensor Added: current apc 1 Output On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
Sounds like nonsense to me.
When did you last update?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 22:51, Morgan McLean wrote:
The only thing thats working in the memory graphing for junos devices. Everything else is seen by discovery but not acted on.
Inventory doesn't populate either, but thats maybe another topic.
Morgan
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.orgwrote:
Hmm. Did tom not already fix this?
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:25, Adam Armstrong wrote:
Hmm. I think I have the same problem elsewhere (processors), and I think I know what it is.
Let me fix it :)
adam.
On 21/06/2012 21:21, Morgan McLean wrote:
My logs look like this...any idea why its not picking up? I have about 50 juniper devices, an APC device and a couple others and it doesn't seem to monitor or graph any of the sensors. I have seen some information about sensor configuration under config.php, but it wasn't very helpful.
Every time the discovery runs, or maybe its the poller, not sure, it finds all these sensors for every device, but it does nothing with them.
Is there a switch I need to flip?
Thanks! Morgan
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.0.0 TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 6.1.1.0 TFEB Intake
21/Jun/12 12:39:04 Sensor Added: temperature junos 9.1.0.0 Routing Engine
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 6.1.0.0 descr TFEB MX80
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.1.0.0 descr FPC @ 0/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 7.2.0.0 descr FPC @ 1/*/*
21/Jun/12 12:39:03 Processor added: type junos index 9.1.0.0 descr Routing Engine
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing listobservium@observium.orghttp://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
See a number of the voltage sensors that are all out of whack - been that way for awhile from what I see - just have not had time to look at it and not seen any other complaints. E.g:
2012-06-25 18:17:14 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 18:10:58 ctrpm System Voltage -12V above threshold: 0.139 V (> 0.06555 V) 2012-06-25 18:07:19 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.468 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 17:57:12 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.468 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 17:42:16 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 17:30:59 ctrpm System Voltage -12V above threshold: 0.139 V (> 0.06555 V) 2012-06-25 17:22:16 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 16:42:12 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 16:27:14 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 16:26:04 ctrpm System Voltage -12V above threshold: 0.139 V (> 0.06555 V) 2012-06-25 16:17:16 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.468 V (< 0.60775 V)
Let me know if I can provide any specifics, testing, etc...
Chris
Chris,
If your device does not supply thresholds, we try to guesstimate something, which can be awfully wrong really quickly, especially with such small numbers... dropping over 10% is really easy like that. You could adjust the thresholds in the database, we don't touch them anymore once they're set - only calculate when they're empty.
If your device DOES supply them somehow, either we misread them, don't read them, or they're just wrong there ;)
Morgan,
The Juniper device thing was in Jira ;) I'd be happy to fix it if you email me the access details in private; I've fixed it before so shouldn't be hard, but I don't like making modifications to the code that I can't actually test.
Same answer for you for the sensor thresholds... though 207 and 0.85 don't seem very related. Maybe we misparse the APC supplied values? Or something happened to the code earlier that got fixed in the meantime. Try setting the limits to NULL for a specific sensor then have Observium rediscover the device and see what it makes of them.
On my APCs I can see and set the warning and over limit thresholds for at least current, don't know about others...
Tom
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 18:29 -0600, Chris Stone wrote:
See a number of the voltage sensors that are all out of whack - been that way for awhile from what I see - just have not had time to look at it and not seen any other complaints. E.g:
2012-06-25 18:17:14 voip01 System Voltage -12V underthreshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 18:10:58 ctrpm System Voltage -12V above threshold: 0.139 V (> 0.06555 V) 2012-06-25 18:07:19 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.468 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 17:57:12 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.468 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 17:42:16 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 17:30:59 ctrpm System Voltage -12V above threshold: 0.139 V (> 0.06555 V) 2012-06-25 17:22:16 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 16:42:12 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 16:27:14 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.551 V (< 0.60775 V) 2012-06-25 16:26:04 ctrpm System Voltage -12V above threshold: 0.139 V (> 0.06555 V) 2012-06-25 16:17:16 voip01 System Voltage -12V under threshold: 0.468 V (< 0.60775 V)
Let me know if I can provide any specifics, testing, etc...
Chris
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
participants (2)
-
Adam Armstrong -
Chris Stone -
Morgan McLean -
Tom Laermans