Question about port tags.

newer
Moving Observium

older
Serverscheck with Observium

Sander Koorneef

27 Nov 2016 27 Nov '16

5:40 p.m.

Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

[cid:86df4c60-7d68-4e23-a87a-19e8b881c859]

[cid:a5013af3-87a3-48b2-8ece-5fb44f33ee4f]

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 1.5 KB)
two_ports.PNG (image/png — 14.5 KB)
two_ports_config.PNG (image/png — 3.6 KB)
two_ports.PNG (image/png — 14.5 KB)
two_ports_config.PNG (image/png — 3.6 KB)

Show replies by date

Adam Armstrong

27 Nov 27 Nov

6 p.m.

Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.⁣

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail

On 27 Nov 2016, 23:41, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl wrote:

...

Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

[cid:86df4c60-7d68-4e23-a87a-19e8b881c859]

[cid:a5013af3-87a3-48b2-8ece-5fb44f33ee4f]

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Sander Koorneef

28 Nov 28 Nov

4:42 a.m.

Hi Adam,

I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:

2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2997; [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 2 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 2) {CID2997}' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '10000000000'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e5'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '10000'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifTrunk] '' -> 'dot1Q'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/3'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/3'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/3'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:05:01'

4 lines for 1/2/4;

2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2995); [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 1) {CID2995 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 1) {CID2995)}' 2016-03-01 17:25:25 Interface changed: [ifAdminStatus] 'up' -> 'down' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e6'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'down'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/4'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/4'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/4'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:02:36'

I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 01:00 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nlmailto:sander@unithost.nl> wrote:

Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

[cid:86df4c60-7d68-4e23-a87a-19e8b881c859]

[cid:a5013af3-87a3-48b2-8ece-5fb44f33ee4f]

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Christopher Pole

5:21 p.m.

That looks like it might be a Brocade device - if it's part of a LAG the description may be configured under the LAG configuration using port-name.

On 28 November 2016 at 20:42, Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl wrote:

...

Hi Adam,

I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:

2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2997; [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 2 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 2) {CID2997}' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '10000000000'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e5'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '10000'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifTrunk] '' -> 'dot1Q'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/3'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/3'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/3'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:05:01'

4 lines for 1/2/4;

2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2995); [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 1) {CID2995 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 1) {CID2995)}' 2016-03-01 17:25:25 Interface changed: [ifAdminStatus] 'up' -> 'down' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e6'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'down'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/4'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/4'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/4'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:02:36'

I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

*From:* observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 01:00 *To:* Observium Network Observation System *Subject:* Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl wrote:

...
Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Sander Koorneef

5:54 p.m.

Hi,

thanks for the tip, but already tried to search for it in the (running) config:

#show running-config | include Cust:

But no cigar.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Christopher Pole chris@apexn.com.au Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 00:21 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

That looks like it might be a Brocade device - if it's part of a LAG the description may be configured under the LAG configuration using port-name.

On 28 November 2016 at 20:42, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nlmailto:sander@unithost.nl> wrote:

Hi Adam,

I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:

4 lines for 1/2/4;

I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: observium <observium-bounces@observium.orgmailto:observium-bounces@observium.org> on behalf of Adam Armstrong <adama@memetic.orgmailto:adama@memetic.org> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 01:00 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nlmailto:sander@unithost.nl> wrote:

Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

[X]

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________

observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Sander Koorneef

6:11 p.m.

Hi,

finished checking with SNMP. I have the following results (omitted a lot of blanks and private info with //).

But nothing showed the mentioned port information stated earlier. Any tips? Maybe removing by hand somewhere in Observium?

Thanks in advance!

root@observium:~# snmpwalk -On -v2c -c // 10.200.0.11 |grep 1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18. .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.1 = STRING: "idrac-bay1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.2 = STRING: "bay1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.3 = STRING: "bay1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.4 = STRING: "bay2.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.5 = STRING: "bay2.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.6 = STRING: "idrac-bay2.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.7 = STRING: "veeam1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.8 = STRING: "veaam1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.9 = STRING: "bay3.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.10 = STRING: "bay3.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.11 = STRING: "wifirouter-am3" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.12 = STRING: "bay4.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.13 = STRING: "bay5.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.14 = "" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.15 = "" // .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.267 = "" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.268 = STRING: "bay4.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.269 = STRING: "bay5.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.270 = "" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.271 = "" // END

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 11:42 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Hi Adam,

I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:

4 lines for 1/2/4;

I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nlmailto:sander@unithost.nl> wrote:

Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

[cid:86df4c60-7d68-4e23-a87a-19e8b881c859]

[cid:a5013af3-87a3-48b2-8ece-5fb44f33ee4f]

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Sander Koorneef

6:35 p.m.

Hi,

think I found it. When I run the poller for only that switch and other switches (ICX7xxx series), I see this:

##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching Oids ifEntry ifXEntry ADSL-LINE-MIB EtherLike-MIB dot3StatsDuplexStatus

And this is what I see on a Brocade CER (and in the output of the poller I see descriptions and aliases);

##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching OIDs ifDescr ifAlias ifName ifType ifOperStatus

So, it looks like something changed in Observium not to using the needed OID's? Or do I look in the wrong direction?

Thanks in advance!

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: Sander Koorneef Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 01:11 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Hi,

finished checking with SNMP. I have the following results (omitted a lot of blanks and private info with //).

But nothing showed the mentioned port information stated earlier. Any tips? Maybe removing by hand somewhere in Observium?

Thanks in advance!

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

Hi Adam,

I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:

4 lines for 1/2/4;

I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nlmailto:sander@unithost.nl> wrote:

Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

[cid:86df4c60-7d68-4e23-a87a-19e8b881c859]

[cid:a5013af3-87a3-48b2-8ece-5fb44f33ee4f]

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________

observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Tom Laermans

9 Dec 9 Dec

9:55 a.m.

This issue should be fixed in r8282.

Appears to be leftover debugging code, and not actually being returned by the device in question!

Tom

On 11/29/2016 01:35 AM, Sander Koorneef wrote:

...

Hi,

think I found it. When I run the poller for only that switch and other switches (ICX7xxx series), I see this:

##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching Oids ifEntry ifXEntry ADSL-LINE-MIB EtherLike-MIB dot3StatsDuplexStatus

And this is what I see on a Brocade CER (and in the output of the poller I see descriptions and aliases);

##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching OIDs ifDescr ifAlias ifName ifType ifOperStatus

So, it looks like something changed in Observium not to using the needed OID's? Or do I look in the wrong direction?

Thanks in advance!

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

*From:* Sander Koorneef *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 01:11 *To:* Observium Network Observation System *Subject:* Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Hi,

finished checking with SNMP. I have the following results (omitted a lot of blanks and private info with //).

But nothing showed the mentioned port information stated earlier. Any tips? Maybe removing by hand somewhere in Observium?

Thanks in advance!

root@observium:~# snmpwalk -On -v2c -c // 10.200.0.11 |grep 1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18. .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.1 = STRING: "idrac-bay1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.2 = STRING: "bay1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.3 = STRING: "bay1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.4 = STRING: "bay2.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.5 = STRING: "bay2.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.6 = STRING: "idrac-bay2.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.7 = STRING: "veeam1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.8 = STRING: "veaam1.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.9 = STRING: "bay3.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.10 = STRING: "bay3.//" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.11 = STRING: "wifirouter-am3" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.12 = STRING: "bay4.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.13 = STRING: "bay5.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.14 = "" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.15 = "" // .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.267 = "" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.268 = STRING: "bay4.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.269 = STRING: "bay5.//.net" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.270 = "" .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.18.271 = "" // END

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

*From:* observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 11:42 *To:* Observium Network Observation System *Subject:* Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Hi Adam,

I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:

2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2997; [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 2 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 2) {CID2997}' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '10000000000'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e5'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '10000'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifTrunk] '' -> 'dot1Q'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/3'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/3'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/3'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:05:01'

4 lines for 1/2/4;

2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed (attrib): [type] -> cust; [descr] -> ommited; [circuit] -> CID2995); [speed] -> 500Mbit; [notes] -> Transporte 1) {CID2995 2016-10-30 00:35:46 Interface changed: [ifAlias] '' -> 'Cust: ommited [500Mbit] (Transporte 1) {CID2995)}' 2016-03-01 17:25:25 Interface changed: [ifAdminStatus] 'up' -> 'down' 2016-03-01 11:50:24 Interface changed: [ifMtu] '' -> '1500'; [ifSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPhysAddress] '' -> 'cc4e24e5f3e6'; [ifAdminStatus] '' -> 'up'; [ifOperStatus] '' -> 'down'; [ifHighSpeed] '' -> '0'; [ifPromiscuousMode] '' -> 'true'; [ifConnectorPresent] '' -> 'true'; [ifDuplex] '' -> 'fullDuplex'; [ifVlan] '' -> '1'; [port_label] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet1/2/4'; [port_label_short] '' -> '10Gi1/2/4'; [port_label_base] '' -> '10GigabitEthernet'; [port_label_num] '' -> '1/2/4'; [ifLastChange] '2016-03-01 11:45:44' -> '2016-02-27 02:02:36'

I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

*From:* observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2016 01:00 *To:* Observium Network Observation System *Subject:* Re: [Observium] Question about port tags. Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail http://www.bluemail.me/r On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nl mailto:sander@unithost.nl> wrote:
Hi guys,


I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium
recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label
(1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and
also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the
first place. The question: how can I clean this up?


I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but
cannot remember the version of it :(


[two_ports.PNG]


[two_ports_config.PNG]


Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.


With kind regards,
Sander Koorneef


------------------------------------------------------------------------

observium mailing list
observium@observium.org
http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium
observium mailing list observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Sander Koorneef

28 Dec 28 Dec

3:41 a.m.

Hi Tom,

thanks! Just updated from r8279 to r8296 and the problem is gone.

It triggered a change after running the 'discovery -h' with good results;

[cid:efd713e4-0410-4eea-81fb-087dbaa53cb7]

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 16:55 To: observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

This issue should be fixed in r8282.

Appears to be leftover debugging code, and not actually being returned by the device in question!

Tom

On 11/29/2016 01:35 AM, Sander Koorneef wrote:

Hi,

think I found it. When I run the poller for only that switch and other switches (ICX7xxx series), I see this:

##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching Oids ifEntry ifXEntry ADSL-LINE-MIB EtherLike-MIB dot3StatsDuplexStatus

And this is what I see on a Brocade CER (and in the output of the poller I see descriptions and aliases);

##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching OIDs ifDescr ifAlias ifName ifType ifOperStatus

So, it looks like something changed in Observium not to using the needed OID's? Or do I look in the wrong direction?

Thanks in advance!

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: Sander Koorneef Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 01:11 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Hi,

finished checking with SNMP. I have the following results (omitted a lot of blanks and private info with //).

But nothing showed the mentioned port information stated earlier. Any tips? Maybe removing by hand somewhere in Observium?

Thanks in advance!

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl mailto:sander@unithost.nl Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 11:42 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Hi Adam,

I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:

4 lines for 1/2/4;

I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org mailto:adama@memetic.org Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 01:00 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nlmailto:sander@unithost.nl> wrote:

Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

[cid:86df4c60-7d68-4e23-a87a-19e8b881c859]

[cid:a5013af3-87a3-48b2-8ece-5fb44f33ee4f]

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________

observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

Adam Armstrong

3:45 a.m.

These changes are picked up by the poller, not discovery :)

adam. On 28/12/2016 09:42:19, Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl wrote: Hi Tom,

thanks! Just updated from r8279 to r8296 and the problem is gone. It triggered a change after running the 'discovery -h' with good results;

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Tom Laermans tom.laermans@powersource.cx Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 16:55 To: observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags. This issue should be fixed in r8282.

Appears to be leftover debugging code, and not actually being returned by the device in question!

Tom

On 11/29/2016 01:35 AM, Sander Koorneef wrote:

Hi,

think I found it. When I run the poller for only that switch and other switches (ICX7xxx series), I see this: ##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching Oids ifEntry ifXEntry ADSL-LINE-MIB EtherLike-MIB dot3StatsDuplexStatus

And this is what I see on a Brocade CER (and in the output of the poller I see descriptions and aliases);

##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching OIDs ifDescr ifAlias ifName ifType ifOperStatus

So, it looks like something changed in Observium not to using the needed OID's? Or do I look in the wrong direction? Thanks in advance!

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

From: Sander Koorneef Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 01:11 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags. Hi,

finished checking with SNMP. I have the following results (omitted a lot of blanks and private info with //). But nothing showed the mentioned port information stated earlier. Any tips? Maybe removing by hand somewhere in Observium? Thanks in advance!

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl [mailto:sander@unithost.nl] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 11:42 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags. Hi Adam,

I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:

4 lines for 1/2/4;

I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org [mailto:adama@memetic.org] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 01:00 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags. Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMail [http://www.bluemail.me/r] On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nl [mailto:sander@unithost.nl]> wrote: Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details. But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label. Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium] _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.org [mailto:observium@observium.org] http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium [http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium]

Sander Koorneef

4:19 a.m.

oops, yes :)

Met vriendelijke groet,

Sander Koorneef Unithost Internet B.V. Tel: 070-7611220

________________________________ From: observium observium-bounces@observium.org on behalf of Adam Armstrong adama@memetic.org Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 10:45 To: observium@observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

These changes are picked up by the poller, not discovery :)

adam.

On 28/12/2016 09:42:19, Sander Koorneef sander@unithost.nl wrote:

Hi Tom,

thanks! Just updated from r8279 to r8296 and the problem is gone.

It triggered a change after running the 'discovery -h' with good results;

[cid:efd713e4-0410-4eea-81fb-087dbaa53cb7]

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

This issue should be fixed in r8282.

Appears to be leftover debugging code, and not actually being returned by the device in question!

Tom

On 11/29/2016 01:35 AM, Sander Koorneef wrote:

Hi,

think I found it. When I run the poller for only that switch and other switches (ICX7xxx series), I see this:

##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching Oids ifEntry ifXEntry ADSL-LINE-MIB EtherLike-MIB dot3StatsDuplexStatus

And this is what I see on a Brocade CER (and in the output of the poller I see descriptions and aliases);

##### Module Start: ports ##### o Caching OIDs ifDescr ifAlias ifName ifType ifOperStatus

So, it looks like something changed in Observium not to using the needed OID's? Or do I look in the wrong direction?

Thanks in advance!

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________ From: Sander Koorneef Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 01:11 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Question about port tags.

Hi,

finished checking with SNMP. I have the following results (omitted a lot of blanks and private info with //).

But nothing showed the mentioned port information stated earlier. Any tips? Maybe removing by hand somewhere in Observium?

Thanks in advance!

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

Hi Adam,

I found the following port logs, there where only 3 lines for 1/2/3:

4 lines for 1/2/4;

I also tried to disable and enable the port yesterday, but I don't see that in the logs. I am now trying to get the ifalias info from SNMP to test.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

Is observium trying to clear tge port description for this port every 5 mins? (You can see in the event log for the port).

If so, its an observium bug. If not, it's a vendor bug reporting incorrect ifAlias.

Adam.

Sent from BlueMailhttp://www.bluemail.me/r On 27 Nov 2016, at 23:41, Sander Koorneef <sander@unithost.nlmailto:sander@unithost.nl> wrote:

Hi guys,

I have two ports in my environment with some tags on it. Observium recognizes it as a Customer and some other details.

But the thing is; one port is a stacking port without label (1/2/3, what you don't see), and the other one is disabled and also without a label.

Maybe I overlooked something. Never created the labels in the first place. The question: how can I clean this up?

I can remember that this popped up after a upgrade recently, but cannot remember the version of it :(

[cid:86df4c60-7d68-4e23-a87a-19e8b881c859]

[cid:a5013af3-87a3-48b2-8ece-5fb44f33ee4f]

Running Observium 0.16.11.8262 (27th November 2016) Rolling.

With kind regards, Sander Koorneef

________________________________

observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

_______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium@observium.orgmailto:observium@observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

3070

Age (days ago)

3101

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

10 comments

4 participants

tags (0)

participants (4)

Adam Armstrong
Christopher Pole
Sander Koorneef
Tom Laermans