- observium - lists.observium.org

CASA CMTS - 32bit counters used instead of 64bit.
by T-MONT Administrator 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

Hi, I'm trying to monitor CASA c2200 CMTS device with Observium; it gets recognized as "casa-dcts". The problem is that Observium doesn't use 64bit interface counters but 32bit for downstream and upstream interfaces. This results in gaps in the traffic graphs when traffic counter overflows. How can I force Observium to switch to use 64bit counters instead of 32bit? Thanks! Pawel

2 1

Issue with traffic volume graph for asymmetric interfaces.
by T-MONT Administrator 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

Hi Adam, Any chances to implement this change? Thaks & Regards, Pawel > Fixing this would need a little bit of rewriting of the graph > definition.

1 0

Dropout and graph problems in graphs.............!
by Chaman Rathee 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

Is there anyone who is monitoring 200 devices in Observium? Because I am facing dropout and gap problem in graphs. CPU and Physical Memory utilization also goes more than 80%. Server detail is here:- Machine Type :- VM ( Guest OS) Physical Memory :- 12GB Swap Size :- 4GB No. Of CPU :- 8 Note:- We are monitoring 200 devices in Observium. [cid:image001.png@01D116E8.95AF6A60] ......... With Best Regards, Chaman Rathee Mob. No:- +91-9560055816 [Fabrikam] Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), please delete this message and kindly notify the sender by an emailed reply. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Progression and its associate entities shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by them.

4 8

Issue with traffic volume graph for asymmetric interfaces.
by T-MONT Administrator 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

Hi guys, I have problem with graphing traffic graphs for one of my Observium monitored device; problem occurs when it comes to graph traffic for asymmetric interfaces - ones that only send or receive traffic. The problem is that when such interface is queried on the device for actual traffic values the response is: for only-sending interface: Rx OID -> noSuchInstance, TxOID -> actual bits for only-receiving interface: Rx OID -> actual bits, TxOID -> noSuchInstance Those values as used then to populate corresponding RRD file which results in series of "NaN"s for INOCTETS or OUTOCTETS data stores. The result is that traffic graph plotted from this RRD is corrupted - like this example: http://i66.tinypic.com/7281fo.png Currently my Observium instance is at revision 7167. Could you share with me any ideas how to resole this issue? Thank you & Regards! Pawel

2 5

QNAP IOPS Latency
by Simone Montagnani 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

Hi, is there any QNAP support to output graph of volume IOPS and Latency via Observium? Regards, Simone

3 3

F5 and Palo Alto firewall
by George Philip 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

Hi,Does Obserium provide support for F5 and Palo alto firewall as I don't see that getting discovered by the application ? Thanks,George

2 1

Observium ports stack
by Σταύρος Κρουστούρης 04 Nov '15

04 Nov '15

Hello, I have noticed that ports stack is missing some entries. As a result i cant find some relations between some physical and aggregated interfaces. Is this a known bug/misbehavior? Do you need some extra details? Thanks -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Stavros Kroustouris - staurosk(a)noc.grnet.gr GRNET NOC WEB APPLICATIONS DEVELOPER - http://noc.grnet.gr -----------------------------------------------------------------------

2 2

Re: [Observium] Dropout and graph problems in graphs.............!
by ron＠rjr-services.com 04 Nov '15

04 Nov '15

I'm monitoring a little over 600 devices with my installation. Likewise in a VM, 8x vCPU @3.0GHz, 32GB DRAM, and 32GB of swap. While CPU goes up to 85+% during polls, I don't have any drops whatsoever. Given what you describe, you probably want to add more memory to your VM. Also, what is your average and overall polling time? You may need to add additional polling instances so that everything completes within the 5min window before the next round of polling starts, which again means more memory will be very helpful. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Chaman Rathee <chaman.rathee(a)progression.com> Date: 11/03/2015 9:37 PM (GMT-07:00) To: 'Observium Network Observation System' <observium(a)observium.org> Subject: [Observium] Dropout and graph problems in graphs.............! -- This message has been scanned by E.F.A. Project and is believed to be clean.

1 0

any update for OSPF alert trigger
by Samarasinghe, Sujith 04 Nov '15

04 Nov '15

Hi , This has been discussed in the past but not sure if I have missed updates. Is there a way to trigger OSPF alerts in Observium? Thanks, Sujith. Confidentiality Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

1 0

dropout or gap over all graphs.
by Chaman Rathee 04 Nov '15

04 Nov '15

Hi Team, I got dropouts or gap over all my graphs. But there is no dropouts/gap for my localhost map. I also increase snmpget timeout to check but it doesn't work for me. ......... With Best Regards, Chaman Rathee Mob. No:- +91-9560055816 [Fabrikam] Privileged or confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), please delete this message and kindly notify the sender by an emailed reply. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Progression and its associate entities shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by them.

3 4