- observium - lists.observium.org

Re: [Observium] question regarding vlan statistics
by Adam Armstrong 13 Oct '14

13 Oct '14

2 1

Re: [Observium] question regarding vlan statistics
by Adam Armstrong 12 Oct '14

12 Oct '14

1 0

question regarding vlan statistics
by Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer 12 Oct '14

12 Oct '14

Hi all, New to observium so apologies if this is obvious, can't find what I'm after. Is there any way of listing the cumulative traffic per vlan across all member ports as individual graphs? Thanks Andy

2 1

Re: [Observium] Interface descriptions are blank
by Adam Armstrong 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

5 14

Re: [Observium] Cisco IPSLA (RTTMON)
by Adam Armstrong 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

1 0

Cisco IPSLA (RTTMON)
by Leroux, Steve 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

Hi Observium Team, We've been running Observium Professional version for many months now. It's nicely designed and polished software. I would recommend it. We used to monitor with Cacti but now we are almost 100% with Observium. The IP SLA Jitter monitoring is great. (CISCO-RTTMON-MIB) Observium currently picks up and records this value. Object rttMonLatestRttOperCompletionTime OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.42.1.2.10.1.1 http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?local=en&translate=Tran…<http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?local=en&translate=Tran…> [cid:image002.jpg@01CFE3C7.D39750E0] We have 2 values missing in our IPSLA values that we monitor and we'd love to see in Observium. For us (and most likely others) the IP SLA is missing 2 critical values: (also in CISCO-RTTMON-MIB) http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_4/ip_sla/configuration/guide/hs… 1. MOS - Mean Opinion Scores Object rttMonLatestJitterOperMOS OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.42.1.5.2.1.42 http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?local=en&translate=Tran…<http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?local=en&translate=Tran…> Sample Value from SW28-TIMWC01: SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.42.1.5.2.1.42.10 = Gauge32: 434 2. ICPIF - International Calculated Planning Impairment Factor Object rttMonLatestJitterOperICPIF OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.42.1.5.2.1.43 http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?local=en&translate=Tran… Sample Value from SW28-TIMWC01: SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.42.1.5.2.1.43.10 = Gauge32: 1 We have Alerts setup in Cacti to notify us when the MOS value goes below 400. We'd love to have this in Observium and eliminate our need to have alerts in Cacti. Here's a sample of the MOS & ICPIF graph in Cacti. [cid:image006.jpg@01CFE3C7.D39750E0] Thanks. Steve Leroux Technical Operations Manager NorthernTel, a division of Bell Aliant

1 0

Interface descriptions are blank
by Roman Romanyak 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

Hello, We are using subscriber edition 0.14.9.5815, polling juniper QFX3500 switch (two switches - Virtual Chassis cluster). After adding the switch and running discovery.php, interface descriptions are recognized just fine, however when the device gets polled for the first time, all interface descriptions get removed. I checked it with snmpwalk and I can see interface descriptions in the output. Thanks, Roman. -- Roman Romanyak Network engineer

2 4

Re: [Observium] Sensors not working - 14.4
by Adam Armstrong 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

3 2

Re: [Observium] Sensors not working - 14.4
by Adam Armstrong 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

1 0

Re: [Observium] Sensors not working - 14.4
by Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

Mmm, fair point, although our particular hospital is millions in debt, so paperclips are banned. Who knows where all the cash goes.. From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: 09 October 2014 17:48 To: Observium Network Observation System Subject: Re: [Observium] Sensors not working - 14.4 I expect the NHS's paperclip budget is greater than observium's income. :) Adam. Michael Loftis <mloftis(a)wgops.com> wrote: On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Franks Andy (RLZ) IT Systems Engineer wrote: > Adam, > I totally see your point, and am surprised that it's only a 12% uptake > to be honest. > > As an aside question - what methods of payment for the professional > product are supported and how do I go about it? Still need to sweet-talk > the boss but it's looking promising. > Cheers - keep up the good work. > Andy. It's really so cheap. They certainly spend more on toilet paper, or coffee, or pens, or paper, or paperclips (ok maybe not paperclips)...well just about anything. Especially on an annual basis. Very much worth it. _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

1 0