imo, 1920 will be common for quite a while yet.
any chance you can make the scaling formulaic, based on a config parameter?
that way you only have to do it once, forever.
(bonus: mbp folks are happy, you can be lazy when 8k shows up, etc…)
R.
On May 27, 2014, at 1:56, observium-request(a)observium.org wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Are any of you running 4k displays yet?
>
> We've been thinking about how to handle larger displays and were
> considering jumping straight from the existing 1280px wide to 3840px
> rather than building a 'widescreen' mode on 1920px.
>
> I think it would be most noticeable in the amount and resolution of the
> graphs we could display. We could effectively fit twice the amount of
> data into each graph. It would probably require quite a lot of work, so
> it's important we get the resolution correct!
>
> (no, i don't care about your macbook pro's silly resolution)
>
> adam.
