- observium - lists.observium.org

P2P-RADIO
by Eduardo Schoedler 12 May '16

12 May '16

Hi Adam and team, Any chances to add support to Ceragon / SIAE / Huawei microwave radios? Jira tickets #1532, #1533 and #1535. Our concern is about monitoring sensors, like input voltage and modulation. Thank you. -- Eduardo Schoedler

2 1

Customer billing search
by Jan Kuiper 12 May '16

12 May '16

Hi, I want to search for a bill, but the bill search function seems to be broken again, even when we clear the search settings no records are found. A refresh (F5) of the page show all records again. Is it possible to fix this? We are running version 0.16.5.7833. Best regards, Jan Kuiper From: Jan Kuiper Sent: maandag 10 augustus 2015 17:11 To: observium(a)observium.org Subject: Customer billing Hi, I want to search for bills, but the bill search function does only give all bills instead of the requested Bill Name. Has anyone the same issue, if no what can I do wrong or fix it? I am running the stable version 6833. Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards, Jan Kuiper [cid:image001.jpg@01CF62F0.6DBAB760] Piramide ICT Services | Kollergang 9 | 7773 NG Hardenberg | Postbus 220 | 7770 AE Hardenberg info(a)piramide.nl<mailto:info@piramide.nl> | http://www.piramide.nl | +31 (0)523 261 387 Disclaimer Deze e-mail is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde(n). Verstrekking aan en gebruik door anderen is niet toegestaan. Piramide sluit iedere aansprakelijkheid uit die voortvloeit uit elektronische verzending.

2 1

alert on postfix mail queue
by Simon Smith 12 May '16

12 May '16

Hi All im not sure if this is possible but thought i would email and ask i use the Postfix Queue Shape graph and works brilliantly! is the a way of doing an alert event if the Deferred on one of our servers has an email in it for more then say 15mins ? regards Simon

2 1

No Filesystem info for Solaris version 5.10?
by Dano, Leo 11 May '16

11 May '16

Hello All, I am getting filesystem info in Solaris version 5.11 but not in 5.10. Is there a way to gain this info in Observium, or is it only supported in Solaris 5.11? I get memory, proc and network fine but no filesystem info. Thanks, ----------------------- Leo Dano

2 3

syslog stops working
by John Klasa 11 May '16

11 May '16

Hi, we have syslog-ng configured and went through the documentation about how to get syslog into Observium. It works for a while(from 10mins to several hours) and then it stops to display or handle syslog. Restarting the syslog daemon generates a strange message in the logs. -0001-11-30 00:00:00 Alert (1) 1 : 1 It's very low volume. Maybe 100-1000 messages per day. We have tried rsyslog (default in RedHat) Version Information Observium 0.16.5.7833 (6th May 2016) OS Linux 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64 [amd64] (RedHat 6.7) Apache 2.2.15 (Red Hat) PHP 5.6.21 Python 2.6.6 MySQL 5.1.73 (extension: mysqli 5.1.73) SNMP NET-SNMP 5.5 RRDtool 1.4.8 __________________________________________________ Regards John Klasa Managed Services, Itiviti John.Klasa(a)itiviti.com Kungsgatan 36 , P.O. Box 7742 10395 Stockholm , Sweden Homepage: itiviti.com »

2 1

Re: [Observium] Could not resolve
by Claudionei Mendes 10 May '16

10 May '16

Your thoughts for Big Company and Big ISPs are small. Nobody wants to add thirty thousand devices in a hostname list, or with an nonsense script. They will choose a system that will be allowed to add devices by a subnet or network. That it means IP Address. Not hostname. We are not talking about servers hostnames, that are static, and won't change, even if the room is burned and the building is down. We are not talking about a BGP Router, or a Main router, that are always and forever there, if possible. We are talking about thousand of devices that are changing, at least, once a day. Ron, An DNS fail, doesn't mean I have one DNS server. With all your expertise, you should see other possibilities, other scenarios. Come on. It simply doesn't make sense to have a system that allow you to add a Device by IP address when it wants and later, it's not possible anymore. But you can try tomorrow, because tomorrow the system will accept the IP address. This is a bug for me. Joseph, The system works with IP Address. Whats is the diference to have an option to add devices by IP Address? Not even an option, because it already works, but just sometimes, if you are lucky. Another point, Sure I can make a script, but we are not talking about an expert user to be using the system. Can't this scenario be thought? We have "normal" people operating the system too. How do you think they will reach the Knowledge for this? They not even have access to the system console. You are closing your mind to main possibilities. I am talking about adding 3000 devices in a system, where these devices, does not need a hostname, it simply needs an IP address for eventual access. Because if we have a hostname like juliocesar.company.com, tomorrow, this device will be deactivated and activated for another customer with another name but the same IP address, and it's an infinite routine, because customers are not eternal, and IP addresses are not infinite. Can you imagine an system where we need advanced user only to use? Do you think Microsoft and Apple would be where they are with a software where only advanced user are able to use? Adam, What is an important device to you? Do you think that a customer side device isn't important to be monitored? How many devices have you ever seen in a network? Have you worked in an ISP? Do you have an Idea of what is to manage device hostnames for, until now, 7 cities? Em seg, 9 de mai de 2016 18:49, <observium-request(a)observium.org> escreveu: > Send observium mailing list submissions to > observium(a)observium.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > observium-request(a)observium.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > observium-owner(a)observium.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of observium digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Could not resolve (Ron Marosko) > 2. Re: Cannot add Device by IP Address but can by hostname > (Ivan Jukic) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 16:41:23 -0500 > From: "Ron Marosko" <ron(a)rjr-services.com> > To: "'Observium Network Observation System'" <observium(a)observium.org> > Subject: Re: [Observium] Could not resolve > Message-ID: <004901d1aa3b$888ba2e0$99a2e8a0$(a)rjr-services.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I just want to touch this one point below, and then I’m done. > > > > If you’re running your entire organization on a single DNS server, then > you shouldn’t even be working in this industry. > > > > There are certain fundamental components in any network infrastructure > that should be redundant. DNS, by far, is high on the list of those > components. You should *always* have multiple DNS servers redundant to > each other. Maybe even have redundant load balancers front-ending those DNS > servers. That’s even more true when you’re hosting/running authoritative > DNS servers for certain domains. Whatever NMS you choose to run, even that > isn’t as high a priority for redundancy. > > > > It all goes back to good network and server architecture and design. If > you don’t have a solid base for all that, then all the higher level stuff > is just going to fold like a house of cards. If you spend the extra time to > do things right and not half-assed, then you’ll have a solid network and > have good reporting on everything. Don’t be that half-ass guy. > > > > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of > Claudionei Mendes > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 11:37 AM > To: observium(a)observium.org > Subject: Re: [Observium] Could not resolve > > > > <excess stuff removed> > > > > What if my DNS server, that is a monitored server as well fails? > > > > <excess stuff removed> > >

2 1

I can only apply billings over ports ?
by Francisco José Sánchez Iruela 10 May '16

10 May '16

Hi, Before we used NFSEN for Billing on CISCO , now we have changed to Huawei and we need to know how to synchronize with Netstream . C an only be applied billing on ports? C ould we implement billing on groups / networks / VLAN ... ? Thanks in advance, Francisco José Sánchez IruelaDepartamento de redes <http://www.cartagon.com/> *Tel.* 902 998 398 – (+34) 91 020 11 32 - *Extensión 1105* *Fax.* 902 998 374 – (+34) 91 362 46 46 *E-mail.* fjsanchez(a)cartagon.com <acastellano(a)cartagon.com> Calle Urano 50, 28760, Tres Cantos. Madrid *Web.* www.cartagon.com <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cartagon> <https://twitter.com/cartagon>

2 1

VRF / Arista
by John Klasa 10 May '16

10 May '16

Hi, we have two Arista 7150S-64 switches where we use several VRF's. I have enabled VRF in config.php but they are not showing up in the GUI? Any ideas? Have I forgotten to enable something? Regards -John

2 3

Observium: Full Page World Map
by Nate Mellendorf 10 May '16

10 May '16

Observium team, I was playing around with this myself, but my understanding of PHP is quite limited. I hacked something together myself but it doesn't scale well. Would be possible to add a feature to view the Observium world map in full screen mode? I understand that one could easily argue how this feature wouldn't bring much benefit. They wouldn't be wrong. That said, it would still be a nice to have Observium hanging in the NOC on a TV with a full screen map. I think that's originally what you were going for by having a map on the main landing page. I'm just thinking one step further. Just a suggestion. (Please feel free to tell me if I'm just doing it wrong~) Thank you. Nate Mellendorf | Network Engineer | Netgain CCNA Route Switch - Citrix Certified Professional - Network 720 West Saint Germain Street | St. Cloud | MN | 56301 Phone: 320.251.4700 x183 | 877.797.4700 x183 www.NetgainHosting.com<http://www.netgainhosting.com/> [cid:image002.png@01D1AA60.3D35BF90] ________________________________ The information contained in this email message is for the designated recipient only and may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message or any information contained within is strictly prohibited.

2 1

I want to see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the observium Archives.
by Francisco José Sánchez Iruela 10 May '16

10 May '16

Hello team, Could I see the collection of prior postings to the list ? I click over http://postman.memetic.org/pipermail/observium/ (observium Archives) and I can't acces. I would like to see the other threads that have already been discussed. Thanks in advance, Francisco José Sánchez IruelaDepartamento de redes <http://www.cartagon.com/> *Tel.* 902 998 398 – (+34) 91 020 11 32 - *Extensión 1105* *Fax.* 902 998 374 – (+34) 91 362 46 46 *E-mail.* fjsanchez(a)cartagon.com <acastellano(a)cartagon.com> Calle Urano 50, 28760, Tres Cantos. Madrid *Web.* www.cartagon.com <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cartagon> <https://twitter.com/cartagon>

1 0