- observium - lists.observium.org

Not able to add juniper router
by Ankit Dubey 16 Mar '16

16 Mar '16

Hi, Not able to add juniper routers( Juniper MX104 & Juniper ACX1100) to my License version observium . When we are trying to run SNMP walk from OBSERVIUM, Juniper is not giving full result. Best regards Ankit Dubey ________________________________ This E-Mail may contain Confidential and/or legally privileged Information and is meant for the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error and are not the intended recipient/s, Kindly notify the sender and then delete this e-mail immediately from your system. You are also hereby notified that any use, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this e-mail, its contents or its attachment/s other than by its intended recipient/s is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Internet Communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be delayed, intercepted, corrupted, lost, or contain viruses. Sistema Shyam Teleservices Limited does not accept any liability for any errors, omissions, viruses or computer problems experienced by any recipient as a result of this e-mail.

3 4

Recommendation to support 20K devices on observium
by Ruiz, Carlos 16 Mar '16

16 Mar '16

Good morning everyone, We're evaluating to use observium as hardware monitoring devices based on snmp protocol for devices located all around the world. We're talking about 20K devices and I believe that have one single host locate in SSF, getting all the info from all the devices, located on places like Shangai may not be the best scenario to get the best performance from the tool itself Does observium support the concept of Master of masters?, I mean have local master observium hosts (EMEA, APAC, NA) and consolidate all the info in one single Master Observium Instance If not what will be a recommended approach to cover an scenario like the one described Thanks in advance for your help and collaboration Kind Regards -- Carlos Ruiz Compute System Management Senior Engineer Roche Farma, S.A.Josefa Valcarcel, 40. ES-28027 Madrid (Spain) Phone: +34 91 305 99 25 Mobile: +34 662 10 46 14 * *

4 9

Netapp missing network data
by Louis Bailleul 16 Mar '16

16 Mar '16

Hi, I have a Netapp in cluster mode that I have added to Observium. It only display volume usage but no disk or network usage. Is it because the code expect a mode 7 device ? According to this document http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4220.pdf (Table 27) it should expose some network stuff. I tried the .1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.22.1 oid and it indeed returns data. I have attached discovery, poller and the snmpwalk of the OID mentioned. Best regards, Louis

1 0

Strange error
by Andrew Colin 16 Mar '16

16 Mar '16

Hi Guys Strange one When a device is down it always shows the downtime as per below Any ideas why it says 1year?

2 1

APC device detected as power instead of environment
by Louis Bailleul 15 Mar '16

15 Mar '16

Hi, I have a few APC AP9340 which are some environmental sensors collector. They are detected quite well but are categorized as Power device instead of Environmental. I have attached debug discovery and poller for one of them. Best regards, Louis

2 2

invalid args passed into function error @ r7676
by Rob VanHooren 15 Mar '16

15 Mar '16

greetings. I’m seeing this when running discovery of a c3750 ipbase v12.2(35)SE5 thoughts? thx. R. ##### Module Start: vlans ##### VLANs: CISCO-VTP-MIB (Domain 1) 1 172 192 666 999 1002 1003 1004 1005 1011 1020 1023 1024 1025 1027 1030 1031 1033 1035 1037 1039 1101 1102 1103 1104 1106 1107 1108 1110 2000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2015 2016 2017 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2025 2026 2027 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2037 2038 2039 2040 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2210 2221 4001 Q-BRIDGE-MIB Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. Invalid arguments passed into function get_port_by_index_cache(). Please report to developers. ERROR: Device does not support per-VLAN community. Module [ vlans ] stats: 1[V+] 172[V+] 192[V+] 666[V+] 999[V+] 1002[V+] 1003[V+] 1004[V+] 1005[V+] 1011[V+] 1020[V+] 1023[V+] 1024[V+] 1025[V+] 1027[V+] 1030[V+] 1031[V+] 1033[V+] 1035[V+] 1037[V+] 1039[V+] 1101[V+] 1102[V+] 1103[V+] 1104[V+] 1106[V+] 1107[V+] 1108[V+] 1110[V+] 2000[V+] 2008[V+] 2009[V+] 2010[V+] 2011[V+] 2012[V+] 2015[V+] 2016[V+] 2017[V+] 2019[V+] 2020[V+] 2021[V+] 2022[V+] 2023[V+] 2025[V+] 2026[V+] 2027[V+] 2030[V+] 2031[V+] 2032[V+] 2033[V+] 2034[V+] 2035[V+] 2037[V+] 2038[V+] 2039[V+] 2040[V+] 2045[V+] 2046[V+] 2047[V+] 2048[V+] 2049[V+] 2050[V+] 2051[V+] 2210[V+] 2221[V+] 4001[V+] o Duration 11.076s

1 0

multi site support?
by Bernd Kammlott | kaneo GmbH - green IT solutions 15 Mar '16

15 Mar '16

hey, currently we are using cacti to collect snmp data but your solutions looks much better :) Currently we are collecting data from all our customers into one centralized system on one of our servers. Would it be possible to have some kind of "multi site" installation with observium to give our customers access to their data? We dont want to setup Observium for each of our customers, but want them to be able to have a look at the current state their systems. I could not find any documentation about this feature, is is possible? Maybe with groups or locations? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Bernd Kammlott Systemintegration kaneo GmbH - green IT solutions | Lüner Weg 32a | D-21337 Lüneburg Tel.: +49 4131 22 700 73 | Mobil: +49 170 833 32 67 | E-Mail: bernd.kammlott(a)kaneo-gmbh.de Internet: www.kaneo-gmbh.de | www.facebook.com/kaneo.green.solutions Geschäftsführung: Andreas Kammlott, Nele Lübberstedt | Amtsgericht Lüneburg: HRB 205201 B | USt-ID: DE815486812 | Bitte prüfen Sie der Umwelt zuliebe, ob der Ausdruck dieser E-Mail erforderlich ist.|

5 8

Ethernet Service Instance Interface Names Truncated
by Mailing Lists 15 Mar '16

15 Mar '16

Am I imagining things, or did Observium previously correctly display Ethernet service instance interfaces in the GUI? I've noticed recently that all the interfaces names for service instance interfaces seem to be truncated in a few of the views Picture speaks a thousand words, where these show GigabitEthernet0/16. now, I am sure they previously would have been listed as GigabitEthernet0/16.ServiceInstance.1234 etc; [image: Inline images 1] [image: Inline images 4] Discovery debug example from the device shows the interfaces captured as the full name: ( [ifDescr] => GigabitEthernet0/1.ServiceInstance.206 [ifAlias] => Description [ifName] => Gi0/1.SI.206 [ifType] => l2vlan [ifOperStatus] => up ) If you search in the ports for for the full interface name it knows it as the right thing; [image: Inline images 2] Looks like the GUI just truncates the names? Obviously this makes it harder than it should be to identify the correct interface in the list. Any chance we can have this show the whole thing? :) Thanks, Tim C

6 11

Reporting Devices down when they are up
by Andrew Colin 15 Mar '16

15 Mar '16

Hi Guys I am getting a strange issue Observium is reporting certain devices as down when they are up. I can snmpwalk to them from the server but the gui says they are down Any ideas? Thanks Andrew

2 2

Cisco SG350 as Generic device
by chott＠praha1.net 15 Mar '16

15 Mar '16

Hello, please can you help me with new Cisco SG350XG switches? Snmpwalk attached Observium recognize this Cisco switch as Generic device Tom

2 2