- observium - lists.observium.org

Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model?
by Tony Guadagno 11 Mar '20

11 Mar '20

Nick, I see the devicename notnull and I will use that, thanks for the tip Can someone from observium please let us know if the documentation will ever be updated, and is there a “right way” to do this???? Thanks Tony From: Tony Guadagno via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 9:39 AM To: Observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Tony Guadagno<mailto:tonyg@guadagno.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model? Nick, thanks for the suggestion, but I am not even sure how to do that…the pulldown does not list a “not null”…am I looking in the wrong place? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mc_iwljx6XWjUBU3VxvpyBHQPHCuEsJy/view?usp=… Tony From: Previder Network via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 9:17 AM To: Tony Guadagno via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Previder Network<mailto:network@previder.nl> Subject: Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model? Hi Tony, I noticed that to. I fixed that with "Device Hostname" -> "not null". :) Kind Regards, Nick Derksen On 11-03-2020 14:13, Tony Guadagno via observium wrote: Hi, After upgrading to the latest CE version (quite a while ago), I noticed that the way alert checkers were created had changed. My checkers from before were still there, however, I cannot modify them and creating new ones seems much different. I have looked at the documentation on the web site, and it still seems to reference the old way, not the new way. I want to add a new rule that applies to all devices, I assume I need to make a rule in the “association ruleset” however, when I select “device in”, I cannot put an “*”, I have to pick individual devices….. How do I use the new alert checkers?? Are there docs I am missing?? Thanks for your help! _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

1 0

how do I create an alert checker in the new model?
by Tony Guadagno 11 Mar '20

11 Mar '20

Hi, After upgrading to the latest CE version (quite a while ago), I noticed that the way alert checkers were created had changed. My checkers from before were still there, however, I cannot modify them and creating new ones seems much different. I have looked at the documentation on the web site, and it still seems to reference the old way, not the new way. I want to add a new rule that applies to all devices, I assume I need to make a rule in the “association ruleset” however, when I select “device in”, I cannot put an “*”, I have to pick individual devices….. How do I use the new alert checkers?? Are there docs I am missing?? Thanks for your help!

2 1

Activate alarms for a group of Nodes - Customized Dashboard
by Farah Ameri Mahabadian (famerima) 11 Mar '20

11 Mar '20

Hello Team, I have created a customized dashboard included of 150 ports ( graph ) : I want to activate two below alerts just for 150 nodes not all of the nodes in observium , what is the easiest way by GUI ? Could you please guide me about it? 1. Traffic abnormal, 0 or full bandwidth 2. Physical port down Thanks Farah

2 1

Strange display (20.3.10311)
by luca＠sasdelli.it 08 Mar '20

08 Mar '20

With two HP switches I get this display about SFP modules status: of course SFP modules are equal. Any thought? Best Luca

3 5

Creating check on sensors which only have measured up state
by Previder Network 06 Mar '20

06 Mar '20

Hi Observium Community, Hopefully someone can help me here. I'm using Observium Professional Edition. I'm struggling creating a check on sensors of type dBm which only has measured up state. When i go to Health -> dBm i see al my ports power levels. I can filter there on sensor event "critical". Then i'm getting a nice overview of ports which are below threshold. But most of these ports are down. So many of them are false positives and i'm not interested in them. Then we have the option "Measured State". Over there i can select "Measured Up" and then i'm getting the exact list i want. So i would like to create a check based on this. But when creating a check and assigning associations i'm not able to match based on the "Measured UP" state. In the groups section i'm also having this limitation. Am i overlooking something or is this not possible of hopefully i need to do this another way. Many thanks! Kind Regards, Nick Derksen, Previder B.V

1 0

Customizing description of each port after creating a dashboard
by Farah Ameri Mahabadian (famerima) 05 Mar '20

05 Mar '20

Dear Observium Team, Could you please advise, how Can I customize description of each port after creating a dashboard ,by GUI interface ? Please , see below examples : ( I would like to updated each port description by the name of the customer, Circuit ID .. ) , but as you can see below description is not clear . [cid:image002.jpg@01D5F1AB.E95AC7C0] Regards Farah

6 13

Disk space being full
by Gordon Cheng (gocheng) 05 Mar '20

05 Mar '20

Hi all, Disk space is full on our Observium and we lost the GUI access (only CLI). I’m trying to use “housekeeping.php -a” to clean up the space, and use “delete_device.php” to delete a few offending devices using up lots of space. But it didn’t help much yet. For example, even if I tried to delete a device “phx-nx5596-04”: sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium# ./delete_device.php phx-nx5596-04 Observium 19.5.9872 Remove Device CACHE CLEAR SET. Cache clear set. * Deleted interfaces: id=13437 (mgmt0), id=13438 (Vlan1), id=13439 (Vlan2283), id=13440 (port-channel1), id=13441 (port-channel2), id=13442 (port-channel5), id=13443 (port-channel6), id=13444 (port-channel7), id=13445 (port-channel8), id=13446 (port-channel10), id=13447 (port-channel12), id=13448 (port-channel13), id=13449 (port-channel14), id=13450 (port-channel15), <snip> 64898 (), id=64899 (), id=64900 () * Deleted common entity entries linked to device: device * Deleted device entries from tables: devices_locations, device_graphs, entPhysical * Deleted device: phx-nx5596-04 Device phx-nx5596-04 removed. sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium# It’s still showing up undeleted and using a lot of disk space: sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium/rrd# du -sk * | sort -nr | head 2276640 phx-core03 2256244 phx-core04 2203544 sjc-core03 2199116 phx-spider01 2196748 sjc-core04 2169864 sjc-spider01-old 1885692 phx-spider02 1873348 phx-spider01-new 1862500 sjc-spider01 1452708 phx-nx5596-04 sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium/rrd# sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium/rrd# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/vda3 378G 359G 0 100% / devtmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /dev tmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 32G 8.7M 32G 1% /run tmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/vda1 488M 189M 264M 42% /boot tmpfs 6.3G 0 6.3G 0% /run/user/15115 tmpfs 6.3G 0 6.3G 0% /run/user/0 sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium/rrd# Any suggestions how we can fix and restore it? Thanks. - Gordon

2 1

Dashboard Graph Start Date Weird
by Brian Weeks 05 Mar '20

05 Mar '20

I have a weird problem with graphs that are on the dashboard show correct data but if I click on one the date start is 1969-12-30 but if I choose the device from the device menus and go to the same graph the start date is correct for 24 hours. I have check the date and time on the server and it is also correct I recreated the dashboard graphs from scratch and it still does it. I apologize if this has been asked before but I could not find an answer. -- Brian Weeks Network Engineer Brenham ISD CCNA, MCSE, ACMT, A+, Network+, Security+ 1301 Niebuhr St. Brenham, TX 7783 Office: (979) 277-3760 ext. 2249 Email: bweeks(a)brenhamk-12.net Website: http://www.brenhamisd.net --

1 0

Sensors missing of Dell Equallogic arrays
by Wouter de Man 03 Mar '20

03 Mar '20

Since the last stable upgrade (Professional edition), we have lost all the sensors (and the harddisk status) of our Dell Equallogic PS arrays (3 different types, different firmware levels). Any idea what happened? This worked fine on the previous stable release...

5 13

Datasource maximum not updating
by Milton Ngan 03 Mar '20

03 Mar '20

We discovered some RRD’s for LACP bundles had not updated the DS Max value after an upgrade. So this meant when we exceeded the previous DS Max value, we started getting “gaps” (NaN values) in the graph. I had to manually go in and “tune” the RRD to have a more appropriate DS Max value. Is this something that Observium is maintaining? If so, what would trigger this to happen? In the graph below the LACP Bundle was a 10G LAG, then upgraded to a 20G LAG. Now every time we got above 10G, we get gaps in the graph. [https://netmon.mgmt.valve.net/v/dashboard/port/5306762/bg2-sto2.nm.valve.ne…]

1 0