- observium - lists.observium.org

Not all filesystems added to Observium
by Ciro Iriarte 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

Hi, I have this working without issues for RHEL5 and SLES11, but on a openSUSE host the filesystems built on top of LVM are not shown... The walk gives them all: HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.10 = STRING: Swap space HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.31 = STRING: / HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.32 = STRING: /usr/local/pgsql HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.34 = STRING: /dev/shm HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.35 = STRING: /run HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.39 = STRING: /sys/fs/cgroup HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.50 = STRING: /var/lock HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.51 = STRING: /var/run HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.56 = STRING: /media HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageDescr.57 = STRING: /boot But observium only shows info for /boot, /dev/shm, /media /run,/sys/fs/cgroup, /var/lock and /var/run. On SLES I don't see "in memory/not real" filesystems like /proc or /sys. Regards, -- Ciro Iriarte http://cyruspy.wordpress.com --

2 2

Observium 2901 Break
by Zafar Pravaiz 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

hi After upgrading the observium it show all device down. When i run the discovery it shows as follow. Observium v0.12.3.2901 Discovery MySQL: Cell[1/0s] Row[1/0s] Rows[1/0s] Column[0/0s] Update[0/0s] Insert[0/0s] Delete[0/0s]?? Any fix? -- *Zafar Pravaiz *IT Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology Department AUS /> </span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Times;mso-bidi-font-family: Tel +971 6 515 2164 Fax +971 6515 2112 American University of Sharjah PO Box 26666, Sharjah United Arab Emirates http://www.aus.edu <http://www.aus.edu/> zpravaiz(a)aus.edu <mailto:youremail@aus.edu>

2 1

Re: [Observium] [Observium-dev] FortiGate Support
by Adam Armstrong 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

This is what i was actually replying to, HERP DERP. Also, please use the observium list, observium-dev is mostly just svn. adam. On 2012-02-07 08:15, Matthias Cramer wrote: > Hi > > I'm new on this list, hope this is the right place. > I've improved the Fortigate Support a bit. Moved everything to the newest MIB and added memory and cpu support. > > Attached is a patch based on the current SVN tree. > > Regards > > Matthias > > > > _______________________________________________ > observium-dev mailing list > observium-dev(a)observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium-dev

2 4

Re: [Observium] bug report: Billing Traffic
by Adam Armstrong 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Lol. that is awesome. There is clearly some odd bug in there. Are you able to give me access to the server to try to work out what it is? adam. On 2012-03-16 14:15, Timbo a la Bazzi wrote: > > Here is the printscreen! > > *Van:*observium-bounces@observium.org > [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] *Namens *Adam Armstrong > *Verzonden:* vrijdag 16 maart 2012 13:58 > *Aan:* Observium Network Observation System > *Onderwerp:* Re: [Observium] bug report: Billing Traffic > > can you show us a screenshot from "accurate graphs" for that same bill? > > thanks, > adam. > > On 2012-03-16 11:49, Timbo a la Bazzi wrote: > > Hi There, > > How can I make a bug report? The forum is closed for registration, the > bugtracker also, so I hope this is the correct way and I can help in > the future maybe, because the software is awesome! > > I have the following situation: > > The polling is done correctly and it shows the same results as cacti > for my switch. Buw when I add billing and make a bill for a port with > Quota the first time I add for example 20GB it shows like 20B. If i > then edit it it shows correctly as 20GB (so not 2.0E-8), so there is a > work around. > > When I add a bill for multiple ports the sum is totally wrong. > > For example. I made a bill of 5 ports and 5 bills of each port, so I > can check. > > If a manually sum the 5 bills/ports I get around 80GB. But when I look > at the SUMMED bill it says 1.47PB > > I have added the billing feature this way: > > http://www.observium.org/wiki/Billing > > What am I doing wrong and if it is a bug how can I correct it? > > So there are 2 problems: > > initial quota is set wrong, but can be corrected. -> Bug with a work > around > > quota calculated to high values -> bug or misconfiguration, but I > can't find anything about it: > > So you can see the sum of the 5 ports are 9.36Gbps and it are 5x > 100MBit ports ;-) > > The switch that I am monitoring is a HP2524 > > Thanks in advance! > > Tim Schoondergang > > > > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium(a)observium.org <mailto:observium@observium.org> > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > > > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium(a)observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

1 0

Re: [Observium] bug report: Billing Traffic
by Adam Armstrong 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

can you show us a screenshot from "accurate graphs" for that same bill? thanks, adam. On 2012-03-16 11:49, Timbo a la Bazzi wrote: > > Hi There, > > How can I make a bug report? The forum is closed for registration, the > bugtracker also, so I hope this is the correct way and I can help in > the future maybe, because the software is awesome! > > I have the following situation: > > The polling is done correctly and it shows the same results as cacti > for my switch. Buw when I add billing and make a bill for a port with > Quota the first time I add for example 20GB it shows like 20B. If i > then edit it it shows correctly as 20GB (so not 2.0E-8), so there is a > work around. > > When I add a bill for multiple ports the sum is totally wrong. > > For example. I made a bill of 5 ports and 5 bills of each port, so I > can check. > > If a manually sum the 5 bills/ports I get around 80GB. But when I look > at the SUMMED bill it says 1.47PB > > I have added the billing feature this way: > > http://www.observium.org/wiki/Billing > > What am I doing wrong and if it is a bug how can I correct it? > > So there are 2 problems: > > initial quota is set wrong, but can be corrected. -> Bug with a work > around > > quota calculated to high values -> bug or misconfiguration, but I > can't find anything about it: > > So you can see the sum of the 5 ports are 9.36Gbps and it are 5x > 100MBit ports ;-) > > The switch that I am monitoring is a HP2524 > > Thanks in advance! > > Tim Schoondergang > > > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium(a)observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

2 1

bug report: Billing Traffic
by Timbo a la Bazzi 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Hi There, How can I make a bug report? The forum is closed for registration, the bugtracker also, so I hope this is the correct way and I can help in the future maybe, because the software is awesome! I have the following situation: The polling is done correctly and it shows the same results as cacti for my switch. Buw when I add billing and make a bill for a port with Quota the first time I add for example 20GB it shows like 20B. If i then edit it it shows correctly as 20GB (so not 2.0E-8), so there is a work around. When I add a bill for multiple ports the sum is totally wrong. For example. I made a bill of 5 ports and 5 bills of each port, so I can check. If a manually sum the 5 bills/ports I get around 80GB. But when I look at the SUMMED bill it says 1.47PB I have added the billing feature this way: http://www.observium.org/wiki/Billing What am I doing wrong and if it is a bug how can I correct it? So there are 2 problems: initial quota is set wrong, but can be corrected. -> Bug with a work around quota calculated to high values -> bug or misconfiguration, but I can't find anything about it: So you can see the sum of the 5 ports are 9.36Gbps and it are 5x 100MBit ports ;-) The switch that I am monitoring is a HP2524 Thanks in advance! Tim Schoondergang

1 0

Re: [Observium] [Observium-dev] OS Detection for Cisco SMB Linux Products
by Adam Armstrong 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Hi Matthias, Please update the patch to use the correct discovery/polling mechanism for the CPU load. We stopped building specific rrds a long time ago, it should be detected the same way as memory pools. Shouldn't be too hard to do :) Thanks, adam. On 2012-02-10 06:36, Matthias Cramer wrote: > Hi > > Added Linux Variant detection for Cisco SMB Products (tested with an AP541N) > > Regards > > Matthias > > Index: includes/static-config.php > =================================================================== > --- includes/static-config.php (revision 2860) > +++ includes/static-config.php (working copy) > @@ -66,7 +66,14 @@ > $config['os'][$os]['over'][2]['graph'] = "device_mempool"; > $config['os'][$os]['over'][2]['text'] = "Memory Usage"; > > +$os = "ciscosmblinux"; > +$config['os'][$os]['type'] = "wireless"; > +$config['os'][$os]['group'] = "unix"; > +$config['os'][$os]['text'] = "Cisco SMB Linux"; > +$config['os'][$os]['icon'] = "cisco"; > > Index: includes/discovery/os/linux.inc.php > =================================================================== > --- includes/discovery/os/linux.inc.php (revision 2860) > +++ includes/discovery/os/linux.inc.php (working copy) > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ > if (strpos($entPhysicalMfgName, "QNAP") !== FALSE) { $os = "qnap";} > elseif(strstr($sysObjectId, ".1.3.6.1.4.1.5528.100.20.10.2014")) { $os = "netbotz"; } > elseif(strstr($sysDescr, "endian")) { $os = "endian"; } > - > + elseif(preg_match("/Cisco Small Business/", $sysDescr)) { $os = "ciscosmblinux"; } > } > > } > > > > _______________________________________________ > observium-dev mailing list > observium-dev(a)observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium-dev

1 0

Basic Communigate Pro support
by Matthias Cramer 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Hi All I wrote a application plug-in to add basic support for the Communigate Pro Mail server suite. Communigates own snmp server needs to be run at port 10161 Hope is is of some interest and will be added to the repository. Regards Matthias -- Matthias Cramer / mc322-ripe Senior Network & Security Engineer iway AG Phone +41 43 500 1111 Badenerstrasse 569 Fax +41 44 271 3535 CH-8048 Zürich http://www.iway.ch/ GnuPG 1024D/2D208250 = DBC6 65B6 7083 1029 781E 3959 B62F DF1C 2D20 8250

1 0

Re: [Observium] [Observium-dev] FortiGate Support
by Rob J. Epping 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Hi Matthias, On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Matthias Cramer <matthias.cramer(a)iway.ch> wrote: > Hi > > I'm new on this list, hope this is the right place. > I've improved the Fortigate Support a bit. Moved everything to the newest MIB and added memory and cpu support. > > Attached is a patch based on the current SVN tree. THNX 4 the patch! Your patch fixes version discovery and active sessions polling (at least these were not working for me) and adds a lot of other nice stuff. I hope this gets imported into SVN. > Regards > > Matthias -- GRTNX, RobJE

2 2

Graphic on Processor usage
by Ciro Iriarte 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

Hi, hope someone can clarify this to me. On the processor usage graph I see max usage reaching ~30% but on the info printed at the end of the graph it says ~67%. Am I missing something ?. Ref: http://imageshack.us/f/593/cpub.png/ Regards, -- Ciro Iriarte http://cyruspy.wordpress.com --

2 3