- observium - lists.observium.org

All devices a new field "Note"
by Krenek Milan DiS. 04 Jul '17

04 Jul '17

Hi, Can I have wish to improve monitoring system :) Is possible implement for all devices a new field "Note" for write notes like in VmWare? BR Milan

1 0

List of installed application / running process
by Krenek Milan DiS. 04 Jul '17

04 Jul '17

Hi, Can I have wish to improve monitoring system :) Is possible implement for devices Custom OID with list like examples bellow or implement list of install application snmptable -v1 -c Public servername .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.6.3 or list of running processes snmptable -v1 -c Public servername .1.3.6.1.2.1.25.4.2 and possibilty create alert when running process is not in the list ;-) S přátelským pozdravem / Mit freundlichen Grüßen BR Milan

1 0

Show server network shares
by Krenek Milan DiS. 04 Jul '17

04 Jul '17

Hi, Can I have wish to improve monitoring system :) Is possible implemet to device information "network shares" from Windows system? BR Milan

1 0

Alert Checkers and Mail Settings
by Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA 03 Jul '17

03 Jul '17

Hello Experts, Quick one, I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section. I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices. But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ??? Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts. For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section: [cid:image001.png@01D2F3D8.B1EB9EA0] So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ? Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ? PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating Regards Kaustubh From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM To: Observium Cc: observium Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling. How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo Adam. Sent from BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856> On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: Hello Experts, I See there 2 settings for ports on the device: [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060] My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ?? Regards Kaustubh From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM To: Observium; observium Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers Small remark, Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything. Kind regards From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09 To: Observium <observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org>>; Observium <observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org>>; observium <observium-bounces(a)observium.org<mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org>> Cc: observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers Thank you Simon, It worked after rebuild: [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060] I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers. Anyways Thanks guys ☺ very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers Regards Kaustubh From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM To: Observium Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers Hi, Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'? Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!? Regards Simon On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: Adam, I am seeing some assistance here. Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN” If I put a condition as ifOperStatus equals up ifAdminStatus equals up What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain. Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck. If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you: You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” : <image001.png> Look at my alert Check: <image002.png> Now tell me why no number count here. I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist. Regards Kaustubh From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM To: observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert. It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense. Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples. adam. On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: Example in the documentation: Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing Regards kaustubh From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM To: 'Observium' Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org>' Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers Hi Team, TO add on the below, I have referred to the documentation section, The settings I have: The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ? Regards Kaustubh From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM To: observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Observium Public Support; observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers HI Team, Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ? Regards Kaustubh From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM To: observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers. Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format. Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense. You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again. Thanks, adam. On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: Thank you for the Response Adam, Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing. If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers. Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ? Regards Kaustubh From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM To: Observium Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium Hi, This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do. Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data! Thanks, Adam. Sent from BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: Hi Team, First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list. Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details: I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results. I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high. If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot. Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ? Thank you and Regards Kaustubh The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. ________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. ________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.

2 1

New request created with ID: ##398## from observium-request
by SABIN SUBRAMANNIAN 02 Jul '17

02 Jul '17

1 0

Re: [Observium] observium Digest, Vol 84, Issue 1
by 张来 01 Jul '17

01 Jul '17

hello！I am ob user. I think I lost my observium svn username and password. Can you help me to set my usernane and password as username：yuri password：Ad2003@0407 Thank you！发自我的 iPhone > 在 2017年7月1日，19:00，observium-request@observium.org 写道： > > Send observium mailing list submissions to > observium(a)observium.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > observium-request(a)observium.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > observium-owner(a)observium.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of observium digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA) > 2. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA) > 3. Re: Alert Checkers (Adam Armstrong) > 4. Re: Alert Checkers (Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA) > 5. Re: python-wrapper loop? (John Klasa) > 6. Re: Alert Checkers (Thomas Nicholson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:07:11 +0000 > From: "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com> > To: Observium <observium(a)observium.org> > Cc: observium <observium-bounces(a)observium.org> > Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers > Message-ID: > <FB5687B07A6D2240865CB25880DDF15654BAED99(a)zklnwp367.int.clsa.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello Experts, > > Quick one, > > I have Port Down Alerts on my Alerts section. > > I have not disabled the polling and alerts for those ports on the respective devices. > > But inspite of it, I still see those alerts in my alerts section. Does it clear or something just because we have disabled the polling for those ports which are down. ??? > > Also, I have put my mail ID as contact and enabled the mail alerts. > > For example, I have 50 alerts in my alerts section: > > [cid:image001.png@01D2F1BF.1E7B2480] > > So I get an alert flood in my mail box for those 50 alerts all once. I have my refresh interval of 5 mins, so after 5 mins I get the flood of 50 mail alerts again ? > > Why there is a recurring of the mail alerts ?? > > PS: I have disabled the: RECOVERY in the alert checks still getting flood of alerts and it keeps repeating > > Regards > Kaustubh > > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:54 PM > To: Observium > Cc: observium > Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers > > No. Disabling polling disables, well, polling. > How do you expect Observium to know a port has gone down if it isn't being polled? Oo > Adam. > Sent from BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856> > On 30 Jun 2017, at 11:06 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: > Hello Experts, > > > I See there 2 settings for ports on the device: > > > [cid:image002.png@01D2F1B6.82235060] > > > My question is, if we disable Polling and only keep Alerts, will the alerts fire for Port down ?? > > > Regards > Kaustubh > > > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Stef Renders > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:50 PM > To: Observium; observium > Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers > > > Small remark, > > > Your OSPF alert should be defined as a syslog alert, which I’m not sure if its available in CE yet. It says it’s being checked, but actually it’s not since the condition or test will not do anything. > > > Kind regards > > > > > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > Sent: vrijdag 30 juni 2017 11:09 > To: Observium <observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org>>; Observium <observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org>>; observium <observium-bounces(a)observium.org<mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org>> > Cc: observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> > Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers > > > Thank you Simon, > > > It worked after rebuild: > > > [cid:image003.png@01D2F1B6.82235060] > > > I did not find in the documentation to rebuild after every time, we add some alert checkers. > > > Anyways Thanks guys ☺ very helpful you are. I will also try to pitch in if I can help or assist someone solve some issues. Cheers > > > Regards > Kaustubh > > > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Simon Mousey Smith > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:28 PM > To: Observium > Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers > > > Hi, > > > Have you clicked the ‘Rebuild' at the top of the Alert Checks Page next to the ‘Add Syslog Rule'? > > > Every time you change something in the alerts check page you have to rebuild!? > > > Regards > > > Simon > > > On 30 Jun 2017, at 09:54, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: > > > Adam, > > I am seeing some assistance here. > > Let me give you a scenario here. I want Observium to alert me when my Port is “DOWN” > > If I put a condition as > > ifOperStatus equals up > ifAdminStatus equals up > > What is use of the alerting ? I do not want alerts if my port is UP. I hope you get it. Please explain. > > Also FYI, even if I change the entity type to “Port” from Device, then also no luck. > > If you want me to pay more attention, let me get an example to you: > > You have BGP example on your “Excellent Website” : > > <image001.png> > > Look at my alert Check: > > <image002.png> > > Now tell me why no number count here. > > I am trying to understand the tool here, as I am using this for the first time, hence asking you to please assist. > > Regards > Kaustubh > > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:17 PM > To: observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> > Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers > > That isn't a port alert. It's a device alert. > > It's very, very important that the entity type is set correctly. Also you have switched "equals" to "notequals", which means the checker no longer makes sense. > > Please pay more attention to the specific details of the examples. > > adam. > On 30/06/2017 09:44:13, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: > Example in the documentation: > > Port status should be down for the alert, I have mentioned notequals up in my below snippet, but still no count is reproducing > > Regards > kaustubh > From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:09 PM > To: 'Observium' > Cc: 'Observium Public Support'; 'observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org>' > Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers > > Hi Team, > > TO add on the below, > > I have referred to the documentation section, > > > The settings I have: > > > > The settings seems correct, they why it does not reflect anything in the count section ? > > Regards > Kaustubh > From: Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:04 PM > To: observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> > Cc: Observium Public Support; observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> > Subject: RE: [Observium] Alert Checkers > > HI Team, > > Could you give me a working example of the alert checker ? > > Regards > Kaustubh > > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 1:13 PM > To: observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> > Subject: Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers > > This suggests that the alert table hasn't been regenerated since you created these alert checkers. > > Note that the OSPF one won't ever work, because it's just a bunch of nonsense text which doesn't match the checker format. > > Also the temperature alert, sensor event alert and port operational status alerts won't work because they don't really make any sense. > > You need to read the documentation and examples about creating alert checkers again. > > Thanks, > adam. > On 30/06/2017 08:12:59, Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: > Thank you for the Response Adam, > > Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing. > > > If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers. > > Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ? > > Regards > Kaustubh > > From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong > Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM > To: Observium > Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> > Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium > > Hi, > This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do. > Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data! > Thanks, > Adam. > Sent from BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856> > On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: > Hi Team, > > First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list. > > Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details: > > > I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results. > > I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high. > > If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot. > > Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ? > > Thank you and Regards > Kaustubh > > The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. > These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. > CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. > > ________________________________ > > observium mailing list > observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. > These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. > CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. > The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. > These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. > CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. > The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. > These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. > CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > > > > The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. > These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. > CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. > > The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. > These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. > CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. > > ________________________________ > > observium mailing list > observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. > These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. > CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. >

3 2

Re: [Observium] Alert Checkers
by Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA 30 Jun '17

30 Jun '17

Thank you for the Response Adam, Was also wondering, I have added some alert checks for Network related testing. [cid:image001.png@01D2F19D.1634BC40] If you see, the one highlighted are for Network related alerts, but I seem to have some issue here. If you look at the above for the CPU, Memory, Storage, etc the tool is able to detect and show the numbers in “Green” and “Red” But there is nothing indicating for BGP, high temperature and other highlighted alert checkers. Am I doing something different here or my alert conditions have issues ? Regards Kaustubh From: observium [mailto:observium-bounces@observium.org] On Behalf Of Adam Armstrong Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:27 AM To: Observium Cc: Kunal Shah, CLSA; observium(a)observium.org Subject: Re: [Observium] Process Level Alerts in Observium Hi, This isn't possible, and would actually be pretty complicated to do. Not least because Observium doesn't yet collect per-process data! Thanks, Adam. Sent from BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=9856> On 30 Jun 2017, at 4:57 am, "Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA" <kaustubh.parthasarthy(a)clsa.com<mailto:kaustubh.parthasarthy@clsa.com>> wrote: Hi Team, First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list. Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details: [cid:image001.png@01D2F0C3.971FFA70] I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results. I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high. If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot. Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ? Thank you and Regards Kaustubh The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact. ________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.

6 23

python-wrapper loop?
by John Klasa 30 Jun '17

30 Jun '17

Hi I've upgraded to this version: ./discovery.php -V Observium 17.5.8580 It seemed to be a great update but then MySQL died and I found this in the logs: [2017/06/29 15:05:20 +0200] poller-wrapper.py(29309): /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py: URGENT: poller-wrapper not started because already running 34 processes, load average (5min) 37.17 And it kept increasing upton load over 70 where I killed all python, CROND and for some reason A LOT of ps processes. An example of processes below. 26133 ? D 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 23434 26331 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 2981 26354 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 10439 26355 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 11755 26356 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 5772 26357 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 2624 26360 ? R 0:00 ps -ww -o ppid,uid,args -p 19699 846 purify 20 0 342884 70760 1636 S 1.0 1.9 0:33.02 python 4424 purify 20 0 354536 11156 1632 S 1.0 0.3 1:27.40 python 4739 purify 20 0 356676 11832 1632 S 1.0 0.3 1:36.27 python 9718 purify 20 0 349728 10108 1636 S 1.0 0.3 1:03.00 python 20551 purify 20 0 361020 12280 1632 S 1.0 0.3 2:01.39 python 31260 purify 20 0 348144 76392 1636 S 1.0 2.0 0:56.62 python 402 purify 20 0 345244 33752 1636 S 0.7 0.9 0:43.67 python 1315 purify 20 0 343148 59904 1632 S 0.7 1.6 0:35.71 python 3219 purify 20 0 341844 47340 1632 S 0.7 1.3 0:28.92 python 3298 purify 20 0 353204 11376 1632 S 0.7 0.3 1:19.76 python Anyone know whats going on? I see this when I try to run the debug output Your PHP version is too old (5.4.16), | | functionality may be broken. Please update your PHP! | | Currently recommended version(s): 7.0.x or 5.6.x I guess I should upgrade PHP first. Regards -John

2 2

Process Level Alerts in Observium
by Kaustubh Parthasarthy, CLSA 30 Jun '17

30 Jun '17

Hi Team, First, I would like to subscribe to the Observium mailing list. Second, i am using the Community Edition of Observium. Following are the details: [cid:image001.png@01D2F0C3.971FFA70] I have setup some alert checks to capture the high CPU alerts. I was also successful to capture some alert. PFA the results. I would like to know, if we can also show, which are the top 10 processes, which are running and as a result the utilization is going high. If I can get the output of the top 10 or top 5 processes on the same mail which is attached, this would assist the support teams to troubleshoot. Could you please assist on this as to how can I setup ? Thank you and Regards Kaustubh The content of this communication is intended for the recipient and is subject to CLSA Legal and Regulatory Notices. These can be viewed at https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html or sent to you upon request. CLSA is ISO14001 certified and committed to reducing environmental impact.

2 1

getting multiple random down events Device status changed to Down (ping)
by Ron Culler 29 Jun '17

29 Jun '17

Started getting multiple events "Device status changed to Down (ping) " over the last few weeks with no major increase in number of devices. Issue started on Cento 6.9 install with PHP 5.4, MySQL 5.1 (260 devices) HW - dual - quad core xeon CPUs, 24 GB Ram, RRD, MySQL, OS - with Observium install all on separate SSD drives Observium SVN install 17.6.8672 (rolling) Upgraded PHP and MySQL to PHP70 with opcode caching enabled, MySQL 5.7.18 - no change Spun up a fresh install Centos 7.3, PHP70 with opcode caching enabled, MySQL 5.7.18 (install per docs) HW - dual - quad core xeon CPUs, 24 GB Ram, RRD, MySQL, OS - with Observium install all on separate SSD drives Observium SVN install 17.6.8672 (rolling) $config['snmp']['max-rep'] = TRUE; Currently only 139 devices added To eliminate DNS related issues I have added the devices to /etc/hosts and forced resolution to use it first. Cron has /opt/observium/observium-wrapper poller -w 5 running every 5 min. The devices are not down and if I manually poll the device with a "Device status changed to Down (ping) " notice it responds normally and comes right back up. Was wondering if anyone has seen any behavior like this with this build or before. Also is there a way to skip ping during the poller run and just do snmp, and if so is it something that I can enable globally? Thanks in advance Ron Culler

1 0