- observium - lists.observium.org

Custom OID , thresholds, VPN Users
by Svensson Fredrik A 19 Mar '20

19 Mar '20

Hello there! In these times where you might want to now how many users are using VPN to your cisco-device the information is available through custom OID. I hope someone else will find this useful, but my question is thresholds, can you set that up somewhere? Like 0-750, and is it possible to do an alert is we have a Value over 500? [cid:image001.png@01D5FBA9.F5CEC030] Regards Fredrik

2 1

Alerts: device_snmp and avrage
by Torstein Eide 18 Mar '20

18 Mar '20

Hi Is it possible to have a dynamic limit for alerts? like 100% above average for the last 24 hours. Is it possible to list vaules for all device like device_snmp? Currently is is only possible for Sensors and counters. -- Torstein Eide Torsteine(a)gmail.com

2 1

Re: [Observium] Custom OID , thresholds, VPN Users
by Tony Guadagno 18 Mar '20

18 Mar '20

I was able to get this working and it is a really great tip Btw, Josh, I used .29.0 for L2L tunnels and am getting the right numbers… I used http://www.mibdepot.com/cgi-bin/getmib3.cgi?i=1&n=CISCO-REMOTE-ACCESS-MONIT… to research. I think .26 is all IPSEC connections, that would include client to site IPSEC as well as site to site. If you use .29.0, you get only L2L connections. thanks Tony From: Josh Benner<mailto:joshb@aweber.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 2:19 PM To: Observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Tony Guadagno<mailto:tonyg@guadagno.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] Custom OID , thresholds, VPN Users I added this to ours. I had to use a slightly different OID to see IPSec sessions (replaced the final 35 with a 26). Thanks for the tip. Really useful with so much remote work right now! -- Josh Benner Team Lead - Platform Support Engineering Send smarter emails based on open and click tags. AWeber Automations is here.<https://www.aweber.com/email-automation.htm?utm_source=awemail&utm_medium=e…> …And We’re Hiring!<https://www.aweber.com/careers.htm?utm_source=awemail&utm_medium=email&utm_…> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 9:26 PM Tony Guadagno via observium <observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org>> wrote: Hey…THIS IS GREAT!!! But how does it…work? I added the custom oid the way your snapshot shows, but I am not discovering any devices….do I need to do something else…does this work on modern ASA’s? thanks Tony From: Svensson Fredrik A via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 10:55 AM To: Observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Svensson Fredrik A<mailto:fredrik.a.svensson@rjl.se> Subject: [Observium] Custom OID , thresholds, VPN Users Hello there! In these times where you might want to now how many users are using VPN to your cisco-device the information is available through custom OID. I hope someone else will find this useful, but my question is thresholds, can you set that up somewhere? Like 0-750, and is it possible to do an alert is we have a Value over 500? [cid:image001.png@01D5FC68.88DC1260] Regards Fredrik _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

1 0

Re: [Observium] Custom OID , thresholds, VPN Users
by Tony Guadagno 18 Mar '20

18 Mar '20

Hey…THIS IS GREAT!!! But how does it…work? I added the custom oid the way your snapshot shows, but I am not discovering any devices….do I need to do something else…does this work on modern ASA’s? thanks Tony From: Svensson Fredrik A via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 10:55 AM To: Observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Svensson Fredrik A<mailto:fredrik.a.svensson@rjl.se> Subject: [Observium] Custom OID , thresholds, VPN Users Hello there! In these times where you might want to now how many users are using VPN to your cisco-device the information is available through custom OID. I hope someone else will find this useful, but my question is thresholds, can you set that up somewhere? Like 0-750, and is it possible to do an alert is we have a Value over 500? [cid:image001.png@01D5FBD9.7D019B70] Regards Fredrik

2 1

Re: [Observium] upgrade from community to pro
by Tony Guadagno 17 Mar '20

17 Mar '20

Thanks Markus! Tony From: Markus Klock via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 4:34 PM To: Observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Markus Klock<mailto:markus@best-practice.se> Subject: Re: [Observium] upgrade from community to pro https://docs.observium.org/ce-migration/ /Markus Den mån 16 mars 2020 kl 21:29 skrev Tony Guadagno via observium <observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org>>: Hi, I have looked but I don’t see any instructions on how to convert from community edition to professional…can someone point me to these directions? Thanks Tony _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

1 0

upgrade from community to pro
by Tony Guadagno 17 Mar '20

17 Mar '20

Hi, I have looked but I don’t see any instructions on how to convert from community edition to professional…can someone point me to these directions? Thanks Tony

2 1

Aruba 8325 being detected as generic device
by Eduardo Costa 13 Mar '20

13 Mar '20

Hi all, I've added a recent switch (Aruba 8325) and is being detected as generic device. [cid:image003.png@01D5F91E.737091F0] It finds the ports and everything else. [cid:image004.png@01D5F91E.737091F0] Any suggestions? EC _________________________________________________________________________ Eduardo Costa Administrador de Sistemas AIRC - Associação de Informática da Região Centro Coimbra iParque, Lote nº 15 3040-540 Antanhol - Coimbra +351-239-850569 | Direto +351-239-850599 | Fax eduardo.costa(a)airc.pt<mailto:eduardo.costa@airc.pt> | e-Mail

3 2

Could not reach r4 with given SNMP parameters using v3
by NSE 13 Mar '20

13 Mar '20

Hello Community, I am using observium for the first time i am adding a device on the observium server via SNMPv3 and i am getting below error message. 1. No reply on credentials U1/authNoPriv using v3. 2. Could not reach r4 with given SNMP parameters using v3. any help Regards, KM

2 1

Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model?
by Tony Guadagno 12 Mar '20

12 Mar '20

Yes, thanks, if you look further in the thread, you will see I found this also Quote: >Nick, I see the devicename notnull and I will use that, thanks for the tip > >Can someone from observium please let us know if the documentation will ever be updated, and is there a “right way” to do this???? I would still like someone at observium to address the documentation issues and publish a new guide to writing checkers that reflects the changes made last year. Thanks Tony From: Previder Network<mailto:network@previder.nl> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 9:24 AM To: Tony Guadagno<mailto:tonyg@guadagno.org>; Observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: network(a)previder.nl<mailto:network@previder.nl> Subject: Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model? [cid:image001.png@01D5F850.783EC770] On 11-03-2020 14:39, Tony Guadagno wrote: Nick, thanks for the suggestion, but I am not even sure how to do that…the pulldown does not list a “not null”…am I looking in the wrong place? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mc_iwljx6XWjUBU3VxvpyBHQPHCuEsJy/view?usp=… Tony From: Previder Network via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 9:17 AM To: Tony Guadagno via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Previder Network<mailto:network@previder.nl> Subject: Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model? Hi Tony, I noticed that to. I fixed that with "Device Hostname" -> "not null". :) Kind Regards, Nick Derksen On 11-03-2020 14:13, Tony Guadagno via observium wrote: Hi, After upgrading to the latest CE version (quite a while ago), I noticed that the way alert checkers were created had changed. My checkers from before were still there, however, I cannot modify them and creating new ones seems much different. I have looked at the documentation on the web site, and it still seems to reference the old way, not the new way. I want to add a new rule that applies to all devices, I assume I need to make a rule in the “association ruleset” however, when I select “device in”, I cannot put an “*”, I have to pick individual devices….. How do I use the new alert checkers?? Are there docs I am missing?? Thanks for your help! _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

1 0

Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model?
by Tony Guadagno 12 Mar '20

12 Mar '20

Nick, thanks for the suggestion, but I am not even sure how to do that…the pulldown does not list a “not null”…am I looking in the wrong place? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mc_iwljx6XWjUBU3VxvpyBHQPHCuEsJy/view?usp=… Tony From: Previder Network via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 9:17 AM To: Tony Guadagno via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Previder Network<mailto:network@previder.nl> Subject: Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model? Hi Tony, I noticed that to. I fixed that with "Device Hostname" -> "not null". :) Kind Regards, Nick Derksen On 11-03-2020 14:13, Tony Guadagno via observium wrote: Hi, After upgrading to the latest CE version (quite a while ago), I noticed that the way alert checkers were created had changed. My checkers from before were still there, however, I cannot modify them and creating new ones seems much different. I have looked at the documentation on the web site, and it still seems to reference the old way, not the new way. I want to add a new rule that applies to all devices, I assume I need to make a rule in the “association ruleset” however, when I select “device in”, I cannot put an “*”, I have to pick individual devices….. How do I use the new alert checkers?? Are there docs I am missing?? Thanks for your help! _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

2 1

Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model?
by Tony Guadagno 12 Mar '20

12 Mar '20

Nick, I see the devicename notnull and I will use that, thanks for the tip Can someone from observium please let us know if the documentation will ever be updated, and is there a “right way” to do this???? Thanks Tony From: Tony Guadagno via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 9:39 AM To: Observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Tony Guadagno<mailto:tonyg@guadagno.org> Subject: Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model? Nick, thanks for the suggestion, but I am not even sure how to do that…the pulldown does not list a “not null”…am I looking in the wrong place? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mc_iwljx6XWjUBU3VxvpyBHQPHCuEsJy/view?usp=… Tony From: Previder Network via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 9:17 AM To: Tony Guadagno via observium<mailto:observium@observium.org> Cc: Previder Network<mailto:network@previder.nl> Subject: Re: [Observium] how do I create an alert checker in the new model? Hi Tony, I noticed that to. I fixed that with "Device Hostname" -> "not null". :) Kind Regards, Nick Derksen On 11-03-2020 14:13, Tony Guadagno via observium wrote: Hi, After upgrading to the latest CE version (quite a while ago), I noticed that the way alert checkers were created had changed. My checkers from before were still there, however, I cannot modify them and creating new ones seems much different. I have looked at the documentation on the web site, and it still seems to reference the old way, not the new way. I want to add a new rule that applies to all devices, I assume I need to make a rule in the “association ruleset” however, when I select “device in”, I cannot put an “*”, I have to pick individual devices….. How do I use the new alert checkers?? Are there docs I am missing?? Thanks for your help! _______________________________________________ observium mailing list observium(a)observium.org<mailto:observium@observium.org> http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

1 0

how do I create an alert checker in the new model?
by Tony Guadagno 11 Mar '20

11 Mar '20

Hi, After upgrading to the latest CE version (quite a while ago), I noticed that the way alert checkers were created had changed. My checkers from before were still there, however, I cannot modify them and creating new ones seems much different. I have looked at the documentation on the web site, and it still seems to reference the old way, not the new way. I want to add a new rule that applies to all devices, I assume I need to make a rule in the “association ruleset” however, when I select “device in”, I cannot put an “*”, I have to pick individual devices….. How do I use the new alert checkers?? Are there docs I am missing?? Thanks for your help!

2 1

Activate alarms for a group of Nodes - Customized Dashboard
by Farah Ameri Mahabadian (famerima) 11 Mar '20

11 Mar '20

Hello Team, I have created a customized dashboard included of 150 ports ( graph ) : I want to activate two below alerts just for 150 nodes not all of the nodes in observium , what is the easiest way by GUI ? Could you please guide me about it? 1. Traffic abnormal, 0 or full bandwidth 2. Physical port down Thanks Farah

2 1

Strange display (20.3.10311)
by luca＠sasdelli.it 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

With two HP switches I get this display about SFP modules status: of course SFP modules are equal. Any thought? Best Luca

3 5

Creating check on sensors which only have measured up state
by Previder Network 06 Mar '20

06 Mar '20

Hi Observium Community, Hopefully someone can help me here. I'm using Observium Professional Edition. I'm struggling creating a check on sensors of type dBm which only has measured up state. When i go to Health -> dBm i see al my ports power levels. I can filter there on sensor event "critical". Then i'm getting a nice overview of ports which are below threshold. But most of these ports are down. So many of them are false positives and i'm not interested in them. Then we have the option "Measured State". Over there i can select "Measured Up" and then i'm getting the exact list i want. So i would like to create a check based on this. But when creating a check and assigning associations i'm not able to match based on the "Measured UP" state. In the groups section i'm also having this limitation. Am i overlooking something or is this not possible of hopefully i need to do this another way. Many thanks! Kind Regards, Nick Derksen, Previder B.V

1 0

Customizing description of each port after creating a dashboard
by Farah Ameri Mahabadian (famerima) 06 Mar '20

06 Mar '20

Dear Observium Team, Could you please advise, how Can I customize description of each port after creating a dashboard ,by GUI interface ? Please , see below examples : ( I would like to updated each port description by the name of the customer, Circuit ID .. ) , but as you can see below description is not clear . [cid:image002.jpg@01D5F1AB.E95AC7C0] Regards Farah

6 13

Disk space being full
by Gordon Cheng (gocheng) 06 Mar '20

06 Mar '20

Hi all, Disk space is full on our Observium and we lost the GUI access (only CLI). I’m trying to use “housekeeping.php -a” to clean up the space, and use “delete_device.php” to delete a few offending devices using up lots of space. But it didn’t help much yet. For example, even if I tried to delete a device “phx-nx5596-04”: sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium# ./delete_device.php phx-nx5596-04 Observium 19.5.9872 Remove Device CACHE CLEAR SET. Cache clear set. * Deleted interfaces: id=13437 (mgmt0), id=13438 (Vlan1), id=13439 (Vlan2283), id=13440 (port-channel1), id=13441 (port-channel2), id=13442 (port-channel5), id=13443 (port-channel6), id=13444 (port-channel7), id=13445 (port-channel8), id=13446 (port-channel10), id=13447 (port-channel12), id=13448 (port-channel13), id=13449 (port-channel14), id=13450 (port-channel15), <snip> 64898 (), id=64899 (), id=64900 () * Deleted common entity entries linked to device: device * Deleted device entries from tables: devices_locations, device_graphs, entPhysical * Deleted device: phx-nx5596-04 Device phx-nx5596-04 removed. sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium# It’s still showing up undeleted and using a lot of disk space: sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium/rrd# du -sk * | sort -nr | head 2276640 phx-core03 2256244 phx-core04 2203544 sjc-core03 2199116 phx-spider01 2196748 sjc-core04 2169864 sjc-spider01-old 1885692 phx-spider02 1873348 phx-spider01-new 1862500 sjc-spider01 1452708 phx-nx5596-04 sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium/rrd# sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium/rrd# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/vda3 378G 359G 0 100% / devtmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /dev tmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 32G 8.7M 32G 1% /run tmpfs 32G 0 32G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/vda1 488M 189M 264M 42% /boot tmpfs 6.3G 0 6.3G 0% /run/user/15115 tmpfs 6.3G 0 6.3G 0% /run/user/0 sjc-observium-1:/opt/observium/rrd# Any suggestions how we can fix and restore it? Thanks. - Gordon

2 1

Dashboard Graph Start Date Weird
by Brian Weeks 05 Mar '20

05 Mar '20

I have a weird problem with graphs that are on the dashboard show correct data but if I click on one the date start is 1969-12-30 but if I choose the device from the device menus and go to the same graph the start date is correct for 24 hours. I have check the date and time on the server and it is also correct I recreated the dashboard graphs from scratch and it still does it. I apologize if this has been asked before but I could not find an answer. -- Brian Weeks Network Engineer Brenham ISD CCNA, MCSE, ACMT, A+, Network+, Security+ 1301 Niebuhr St. Brenham, TX 7783 Office: (979) 277-3760 ext. 2249 Email: bweeks(a)brenhamk-12.net Website: http://www.brenhamisd.net --

1 0

Sensors missing of Dell Equallogic arrays
by Wouter de Man 04 Mar '20

04 Mar '20

Since the last stable upgrade (Professional edition), we have lost all the sensors (and the harddisk status) of our Dell Equallogic PS arrays (3 different types, different firmware levels). Any idea what happened? This worked fine on the previous stable release...

5 13

Datasource maximum not updating
by Milton Ngan 04 Mar '20

04 Mar '20

We discovered some RRD’s for LACP bundles had not updated the DS Max value after an upgrade. So this meant when we exceeded the previous DS Max value, we started getting “gaps” (NaN values) in the graph. I had to manually go in and “tune” the RRD to have a more appropriate DS Max value. Is this something that Observium is maintaining? If so, what would trigger this to happen? In the graph below the LACP Bundle was a 10G LAG, then upgraded to a 20G LAG. Now every time we got above 10G, we get gaps in the graph. [https://netmon.mgmt.valve.net/v/dashboard/port/5306762/bg2-sto2.nm.valve.ne…]

1 0

rrdtool (1.4.8-1.2+deb8u1) Error Drawing Graph?
by Sananikone, Athideth 03 Mar '20

03 Mar '20

Hi there, anyone else experiencing "Error Drawing Graph" after last nights apt-get-run updaten RRD to 14.8.-1.2? Athi [cid:tangro_logo_rgb57-176-201_201x97_c39e0fcc-3cb6-4676-b737-ecb5f27f9294.gif] Athideth Sananikone Leitung IT Infrastruktur atsa(a)tangro.de<mailto:atsa@tangro.de> Fon +49 6221 1333 625 www.tangro.de<http://www.tangro.de> [cid:tangro_newsletter_icon_IN_rgb57-176-201_46x42_10395825-8428-4d89-9c27-9617de1dca04.gif] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/3731516/> [cid:tangro_newsletter_icon_X_rgb57-176-201_70x42_fa96ea45-c16c-4377-b5af-b500d6c2d2fe.gif] <https://www.xing.com/companies/tangrosoftwarecomponentsgmbh> [cid:Youtube_Favicon_ee3d2635-aa5a-40f7-92d1-35d68dd1f1d3.png] <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsxrvLKxYpQ-KYK8uGQ8tVQ> [cid:tangro_newsletter_icon_rgb57-176-201_139x42_7758a315-d1ec-4829-adce-36eea7130bda.gif] <https://www.tangro.de/newsletter/> tangro software components gmbh, Speyerer Stra?e 4, 69115 Heidelberg Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Andreas Schumann, Registergericht: Mannheim, HRB 336064 (Sitz: Heidelberg) Besuchen Sie uns an Stand 9 und h?ren Sie unseren Partnervortrag am 25.03.2020! [cid:ELS-2020_600x200px_73179588-b89d-422e-83d2-28d7d77748a9.jpg]<https://www.tangro.de/bme-eloesungstage-2020/><https://www.tangro.de/ueber-uns/events/detail/news/xe-rechnung-muehelos-mei…>

3 2

Unix agent alerting on Postfix mail queue size
by Attila Nagy 03 Mar '20

03 Mar '20

Hi Adam, Tom! We are currently facing the problem of having to alert on Postfix mail queue size coming from the Unix agent (thanks to "careful" users who let their e-mail passwords repeatedly stolen). As I've been trying to read about this in the archives, I see that this is a somewhat frequently upcoming but still unresolved topic. May I ask about the current status of this request?! Best regards, Attila

1 0

Supress Sensor Updated in Eventlog
by Klimek, Denis 02 Mar '20

02 Mar '20

Hi all, is there any method to supress the generation of "Sensor updated"-Eventlog entries if Observium is dynamicly changing the limit_low/high value? Our eventlog contains shitloads of entries for this kind of logs and they are not really useful from my opinion. So we would like to keep the sensors quiet. Currently we are running an external scripts triggered by cronjob to filter out those messages, but if we would supress the creation itself it would be much better Cheers, Denis Mit freundlichem Gruß Stadtwerke Norderstedt Denis Klimek Carrier Manager & Professional Network Engineer IP-Systemtechnik Tel: +49 (0) 40 / 521 04 - 1049 dklimek(a)stadtwerke-norderstedt.de<mailto:dklimek@stadtwerke-norderstedt.de> www.stadtwerke-norderstedt.de<http://www.stadtwerke-norderstedt.de/>

2 4

creating custom probe
by cody＠mail-server.cc 02 Mar '20

02 Mar '20

Hi, I wanted to create a custom probe to read two values from Cisco devices which aren't available via their SNMP agents. How do i get my probe included and What to i need to present the two values (current value, max value) in a graph and trigger an alert when the current value reaches 90% of the max value? Thanks, Cody

1 0

Re: [Observium] How to exclude "virtual Memory" from an alert checker (but keep all other memory metrics)?
by Thomas Stather 28 Feb '20

28 Feb '20

Hi I set the following Device Match / Entity Match: (device.type in server AND (mempool.mempool_descr notmatch *cache* OR mempool.mempool_descr notmatch *Virtual*)) However, the alert is still displayed (which is true since the virtual memory of one of our VMs is stil labove 80%). How can i reset the alert to test that the condition now works as expected? Best, Thomas Am 12.07.19 um 16:30 schrieb Hamilton, Kent: > Here is what I use for the "Entity Match": > mempool_descr notmatch *cache* > mempool_descr notmatch *Physical* > mempool descr notmatch *Virtual* > mempool desc notmatch *virtual* > mempool desc notmatch *Shared Real* > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: observium <observium-bounces(a)observium.org> On Behalf Of Thomas Stather via observium > Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 9:57 AM > To: 'Observium' <observium(a)observium.org> > Cc: Thomas Stather <tstather(a)mr.mpg.de> > Subject: [Observium] How to exclude "virtual Memory" from an alert checker (but keep all other memory metrics)? > > Exegy Email Security > > WARNING This email originated from outside of Exegy. DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > Remember Exegy ITS will never ask for user ID information via email communication. > > > > Hi > > > We are using Observium Professional: 19.6.9946 (rolling) > > > I have set up an alert check to check our servers for fully occupied memory ("mempool_perc greater 80"). > > I want to include the metrics "Memory buffers", "Physical Memory", "Swap space" but i want to exclude "Virtual memory". > > > Is there a way of doing so and if so, how? > > > > Best, > > Thomas > > > -- > Thomas Stather > IT Services > > VCP4, VCP6-DCV, VCP6.5-DCV > > Tel: +49 6221 486 628 > Fax: +49 6221 486 561 > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list > observium(a)observium.org > http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium > > ________________________________ > > This e-mail and any documents accompanying it may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information belonging to Exegy, Inc. Such information may be protected from disclosure by law. The information is intended for use by only the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure or use of the information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately contact the sender by e-mail or phone regarding instructions for return or destruction and do not use or disclose the content to others. -- Thomas Stather IT Services VCP4, VCP6-DCV, VCP6.5-DCV Tel: +49 6221 486 628 Fax: +49 6221 486 561

2 4