- observium - lists.observium.org

Re: [Observium] Missing ethernet port when monitoring Synology NAS
by Adam Armstrong 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Monitoring interfaces is about as industry standard as it gets. If we're not picking up a port, it's because your device is bizarrely not exposing it. Have you tried walking the ifTable and seeing if it's present? Adam. ⁣Sent from BlueMail On 9 Jan 2018, 16:42, at 16:42, Edwin Dijkstra <e.r.dijkstra(a)ziggo.nl> wrote: >Hi, > > > >I'm pretty new on ObserviumJ and could use some help: Added my Synology >NAS. >Want to monitor also the Network interface, but the only port I see is >the >loopback IF. > > > >Thanks in advance. > > > >Regards, > > > >Edwin > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >observium mailing list >observium(a)observium.org >http://postman.memetic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/observium

2 1

Adjust values returned for custom OID
by Vater, Wolfgang 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Hi, I collect temperature data through a custom OID The value returned is 236. That is 23.6 °C Is there a way to have Observium display this with one decimal point? Wolfgang Vater | Lead Client Architect | Enterprise Services Unisys Deutschland GmbH | +49 162 255 9338 | wolfgang.vater(a)unisys.com | Philipp-Reis-Str. 2 | 65795 Hattersheim <http://www.unisys.com/> Unisys Deutschland GmbH | Geschäftsführer: Sandro Lindner & Dr. Uwe Heckert | Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hattersheim | Amtsgericht: Frankfurt/Main HRB 7929 THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. DIESE E-MAIL IST AUSSCHLIESSLICH FÜR DEN ADRESSATEN BESTIMMT UND KANN VERTRAULICHE INFORMATIONEN ENTHALTEN. Sollten Sie nicht der Adressat dieser Informationen sein, bitten wir Sie, sich mit dem Absender in Verbindung zu setzen und die Informationen von Ihren Endgeräten zu entfernen. <http://www.linkedin.com/company/unisys> <http://twitter.com/unisyscorp> <https://plus.google.com/+UnisysCorp/posts> <http://www.youtube.com/theunisyschannel> <http://www.facebook.com/unisyscorp> <https://vimeo.com/unisys> <http://blogs.unisys.com/>

5 6

exclude or skip wildcard match for poller and discovery
by Richard Wigzell 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Hello, We are currently running Pro r8993 with 650+ devices and will be adding another 400 or so shortly, to support this we will try a deployment as described in some detail by Markus: http://blog.best-practice.se/2017/10/scaling-observium-horizontally.html We do however also have another edge case to deal with in the form of an infrastructure that we cannot look into but can send out of, the inhibitor is political and not technical. We are halfway to solving it technically however by using a poller remotely with wildcard host name matching as the 'remote' stuff has a common domain part. Our other 'normal' pollers however need to be told to exclude or skip polling / discovery of the remote devices. Can a wildcard skip or exclude be added to the poller-wrapper script for this purpose? Picture attached for reference. Regards [cid:image001.jpg@01CE9215.D39244B0]<https://www.it.ox.ac.uk/> Richard Wigzell Technical Lead, Storage Platforms IT Services | University of Oxford 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN T: 01865 616282 www.it.ox.ac.uk<https://www.it.ox.ac.uk/>

3 3

graphs
by Arnoldo Vidal Bravo 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Hi, We are using Observium SE Version Information *Observium* 17.11.8960 (29th November 2017) *OS* Linux 2.6.32-696.16.1.el6.x86_64 [amd64] (CentOS 6.9) *Apache* 2.2.15 (CentOS) *PHP* 7.0.24 (OPcache: ENABLED) *Python* 2.6.6 *MySQL* 5.1.73 (extension: mysqli 5.1.73) *SNMP* NET-SNMP 5.5 *RRDtool* 1.6.0 We have a server (Mysql+rrd+apache) and 419 devices monitored, but not showas the graphs, it says NAN. There any reason for this? Cron job is setup # Run multithreaded poller wrapper every 5 minutes */5 * * * * root /opt/observium/poller-wrapper.py >> /dev/null 2>&1 -- Saluda cordialmente

3 5

Alert Checker
by Jacek.Dabrowski＠selgros.pl 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Hi, Is there plans to add more extension in severity ??? It's good that it should be for example: Warning, Alert, Informational etc. Pozdrawiam Jacek Dąbrowski Koordynator Administratorów IT [cid:image002.jpg@01D38A2D.221DDC20] Transgourmet Polska Sp. z o.o. Zamenhofa 133, 61-131 Poznań, Polska tel.: +48 61 87 42 017 kom.:+48 604 069 933 E-mail: Jacek.Dabrowski(a)selgros.pl www.selgros.pl<http://www.selgros.pl> www.selgros24.pl<http://www.selgros24.pl> www.transgourmet.pl<http://www.transgourmet.pl> Transgourmet Polska Sp. z o.o. jest zarejestrowana w Sądzie Rejonowym Poznań-Nowe Miasto i Wilda w Poznaniu, Wydział VIII Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod nr KRS: 0000045597. NIP: PL 781-10-11-998, REGON 630375413. Wysokość kapitału zakładowego: 310.000.000,00 złotych. Zapraszamy do korzystania z aplikacji HELPDESK<https://horologium>

1 0

error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1
by Timothy Illguth 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

Hello Observium, Just curious about what this means: Jan 7 06:51:40 mon sshd[4607]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 57494 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 7 06:51:40 mon sshd[4613]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 57496 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 7 12:53:13 mon sshd[2300]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 60920 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 7 12:53:13 mon sshd[2306]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 60922 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 7 18:33:51 mon sshd[18311]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 34286 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 7 18:33:51 mon sshd[18317]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 34288 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 8 00:52:20 mon sshd[30357]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 39526 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 8 00:52:20 mon sshd[30363]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 39528 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 8 06:51:43 mon sshd[350]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 43064 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 8 06:51:43 mon sshd[362]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 43066 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 8 12:54:53 mon sshd[9955]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 46520 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 8 12:54:54 mon sshd[9961]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 46522 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 8 18:34:40 mon sshd[22397]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 48052 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 8 18:34:40 mon sshd[22403]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 48054 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 9 00:33:45 mon sshd[26212]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 51466 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 9 00:33:45 mon sshd[26218]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 51468 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 9 06:52:49 mon sshd[17401]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 56818 ssh2 [preauth] Jan 9 06:52:49 mon sshd[17407]: error: maximum authentication attempts exceeded for root from 127.0.0.1 port 56820 ssh2 [preauth] We lost all monitoring about this time, is it possibly related? -- ___________________________ Tim Illguth Jr. Systems Administrator Alaska Satellite Facility (907) 474-7924

3 2

Missing ethernet port when monitoring Synology NAS
by Edwin Dijkstra 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

Hi, I'm pretty new on ObserviumJ and could use some help: Added my Synology NAS. Want to monitor also the Network interface, but the only port I see is the loopback IF. Thanks in advance. Regards, Edwin

1 0

Missing EngineID
by Alberto Busso 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

Hi all, I am a new user of observium and I am doing some tests with few devices before deploying it on a wider network. When I try to add my first device (with -d option), it only partially works. In the log I have only this error: CMD[/usr/bin/snmpget -v2c -c *** -Pu -OQv -m SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB -M /opt/observium/mibs/rfc:/opt/observium/mibs/net-snmp 'udp':'172.16.192.102':'161' snmpEngineID.0] CMD EXITCODE[0] CMD RUNTIME[0.0324s] CMD EXITDELAY[10ms] STDOUT[ No Such Object available on this agent at this OID ] SNMP STATUS[FALSE] SNMP ERROR[#1000 - Failed response] So, it seems I am not getting the EngineID object. Then at the end of the log I have this: SQL[INSERT INTO `devices` (`hostname`,`sysName`,`status`,`snmp_community`,`snmp_port`,`snmp_transport`,`snmp_version`,`os`,`snmpEngineID`,`location`,`sysContact`) VALUES ('172.16.192.102','Terlapini RB Sottotetto','1','public','161','udp','v2c','routeros','','Gussago','Elsy')] SQL RUNTIME[0.04079700s] Devices failed: 1. So, it seems that the script will try to add the device but with an empty EngineID field. The result is that the device is added (e.g. I can see it in the device when accessing e.g. via web interface, but when I click on it, it does not show up in the list with a reply that there are no devices matching the search criterias). I also noticed that if I try to add a second device with same EngineID problem, the SQL INSERT will fail with ' duplicate key' error. I have the impression that the EngineID is used as a unique key in the SQL DB and if it is empty this may cause problems. Am I right? In this case, I have to understand why I cannot get the EngineID from the device. Tnx Alberto

2 3

group_id match in Alerts
by Richard Wigzell 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

Hello is it possible to match a group of devices in the Alert/Group code from another group as below? [cid:image001.png@01D388CF.02293860] Regards [cid:image001.jpg@01CE9215.D39244B0]<https://www.it.ox.ac.uk/> Richard Wigzell Technical Lead, Storage Platforms IT Services | University of Oxford 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN T: 01865 616282 www.it.ox.ac.uk<https://www.it.ox.ac.uk/>

2 2

Re: [Observium] inventory for linux
by Patricio Hernan Besteiro 08 Jan '18

08 Jan '18

Hi Guys, I'm not getting any info about serial numbers on "inventory" from linux boxes, is that feature only for networking devices? thanks tons! Kind regards, Patricio Hernan Besteiro Unix Systems Administrator IBM Client Innovation Center - Buenos Aires - Argentina E-mail: besteiro(a)ar.ibm.com

2 1