- observium - lists.observium.org

Stacked and combined line graphs breaks after upgrading to 8889 stable
by Jesper Frank Nemholt 07 Dec '17

07 Dec '17

Hi! Upgraded and now it breaks the stacked and combined line graphs. The individual graphs themselves are OK. It seems to be across the board on all combined graphs and not specific to the example attached (custom OIDs for EMC Isilon) /Jesper

3 11

Fwd: FW: ALERT: [jaynet01a] [port] [Ethernet1/16] MoreThan80PortUtilizationOUT
by Edvinas K 07 Dec '17

07 Dec '17

Sometimes: when pressing on Alert Link, im getting: Unfortunately, this alert entry id does not seem to exist in the database! What could cause this ? Something with DB ? How to troubleshoot it ? Thanks *ALERT* Modify <http://netmon.adform.zone/device/device=223/tab=alert/alert_entry=261590/> *Alert* *MoreThan80PortUtilizationOUT* *Entity* *Ethernet1/16 <http://netmon.adform.zone/device/device=223/tab=port/port=344789/>* *Descr* FEX130A *Conditions* ifOutOctets_perc ge 80 (91) ifOutOctets_perc lt 100 (91) *Metrics* ifOutOctets_perc = 91 *Duration* 16m 3s (2017-12-06 14:46:35) Device *Device* *N <http://netmon.adform.zone/device/device=223/>exus01A* *Hardware* N5K-C5548UP *Operating System* Cisco NX-OS 6.0(2)N2(4) uk9 *Location* , Denmark *Uptime* 1 year, 28 days, 2h 49m 40s port_percent <http://netmon.adform.zone/graph.php?type=port_percent&id=344789> Observium Professional 17.11.8960 <http://www.observium.org>

1 0

Fwd: "sensor_class equals power" doesnt list a Nexus devices
by Edvinas K 07 Dec '17

07 Dec '17

Hello, I've created the Alert Checker with "sensor_class equals power" But i don't see any info about Nexus devices transceiver information. But for example - IOS XR devices shows transceiver information. Is it a problem wih NX-OS snmp stack ? Thanks.

1 0

Device names in Eventlog and Syslog Alerts.
by Peter Derissen 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

Hi, I noticed that some (longer) device names aren't showing complete in the eventlog and syslog alerts. Can i fix this some how? Also, is there a possibility to add colors (red,green) to the syslog alerts? Some screen shots. [cid:image003.png@01D36DEA.45D66650] [cid:image004.png@01D36DEA.45D66650] Regards, Met vriendelijke groet, Peter Derissen Eurofiber Nederland Network Engineer Safariweg 25-31 +31 (0)6 11587110 3605 MA Maarssen [EF-logo_rood_RGB -handtekening]<http://www.eurofiber.nl/> Volg ons op Twitter<https://twitter.com/Eurofiber> | Linkedin<https://www.linkedin.com/company/eurofiber> | Youtube<https://www.youtube.com/user/Eurofibergroup> [cid:image002.png@01D225FF.7ECDA420]<http://bit.ly/2eaBgRh> ******** IMPORTANT NOTICE ******** This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and it is intended only for the addressees. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any copying, distribution or other use of information contained in this e-mail (and its attachments) is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail and delete the message (including any attachments) from your system. Please note that e-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be subject of unauthorized interception or other interference without the knowledge of sender or recipient. Eurofiber only sends and receives e-mails on the basis that Eurofiber is not responsible for any such computer viruses, corruption or other interference or any consequences thereof. Eurofiber Nederland B.V. is registered in the Chamber of Commerce of Amsterdam with number 34134377, VAT number NL 8088.51.524 B01.

4 10

Ekinops pre/post FEC Error counters
by Jay Hanke 05 Dec '17

05 Dec '17

Is anyone using Observium to monitor Ekinops DWDM error counters? Jay

2 2

Aggregate vs individual port graph maximum value & 95th % on bits graph
by Sean Pedersen 04 Dec '17

04 Dec '17

I have two graph questions that I haven't been able to get an answer on via IRC, so I thought this might be easier since I can include more information up front: 1st Question: A 2-port aggregate graph (agg_bits.png) shows a maximum value based on :AVERAGE while individual port graphs (port1_bits.png, port2_bits.png) for the ports that make up the aggregate show a maximum value based on :MAX. Is this intentional? If not, would it be possible to remove or toggle graphing average vs. maximum data on individual port graphs? I think both data points are useful, but in general when providing graphs the 5-minute average the only data we'd want to show them. More data below. 2nd Question: The "bits_old" graph includes 95th % both graphed and in the legend. Would it be possible to get the same for the other bits graphs, or at minimum, just bits? I did some digging and didn't find a means to use options via graphs.php to generate it myself. Question 1 data: An aggregate graph (bits) takes the :AVERAGE inbound and outbound of the two ports, using that data to create the graph and populate the legend (min/max/avg, etc.): DEF:in0=/opt/observium/rrd/dce01.01.mmr01/port-10.rrd:INOCTETS:AVERAGE DEF:out0=/opt/observium/rrd/dce01.01.mmr01/port-10.rrd:OUTOCTETS:AVERAGE DEF:in1=/opt/observium/rrd/dce02.01.mmr02/port-10.rrd:INOCTETS:AVERAGE DEF:out1=/opt/observium/rrd/dce02.01.mmr02/port-10.rrd:OUTOCTETS:AVERAGE The individual ports use both :AVERAGE and :MAX. DEF:outoctets=/opt/observium/rrd/dce01.01.mmr02/port-10.rrd:OUTOCTETS:AVERAG E DEF:inoctets=/opt/observium/rrd/dce01.01.mmr02/port-10.rrd:INOCTETS:AVERAGE DEF:outoctets_max=/opt/observium/rrd/dce01.01.mmr02/port-10.rrd:OUTOCTETS:MA X DEF:inoctets_max=/opt/observium/rrd/dce01.01.mmr02/port-10.rrd:INOCTETS:MAX (I didn't include all the CDEFs, AREAS, HRULES, etc. for brevity, but I have copies of each RRD command for reference, if needed.) The "Max" value in the legend reflects the :AVERAGE-based maximum on the aggregate graph and the :MAX-based maximum on the individual graph. Because of this, when compared side-by-side, the values do not match. Aggregate Max: p1_in: 118.25Mb p1_out: 31.95Mb p2_in: 40.15Mb p2_out: 2.61Mb Port 1 Max: p1_in: 304.39Mb p1_out: 98.77Mb Port 2 Max: p2_in: 90.94Mb p2_out: 14.05Mb -- Thanks, skpio

3 10

Seeing this because these two printers are talking to each other? (see pic)
by Kelley, Ronald E. 04 Dec '17

04 Dec '17

[cid:image001.png@01D36CDB.DD38EF50] Ronald Kelley Houston Methodist. Leading Medicine. Houston Methodist is ranked by U.S. News & World Report as the No. 1 hospital in Texas for patient care. Houston Methodist is nationally ranked in 8 specialties and is designated as a Magnet hospital for excellence in nursing. Visit us at houstonmethodist.org. Follow us at twitter.com/MethodistHosp and facebook.com/HoustonMethodist. ***CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*** This e-mail is the property of Houston Methodist and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. Thank you.

2 1

Observium Hardware requirements
by Juan Camilo 04 Dec '17

04 Dec '17

Hi Friends, My company has a PRO Subscription and we plan to implement Observium horizontally: - Dedicated MySQL DB - Dedicated RRD and web interface - Main Poller - Maybe Poller #2 We need your advice about hardware requirements to poll ~2500 devices and ~100.000 ports. Thanks, Juan Camilo Villamil B. Ingeniero Innovación Y Desarrollo Tic juan.villamil <mailto:juan.villamil@sti.com.co> @sti.com.co (+57 1) 7429797 Ext: 60181 Carrera 13 A No. 89-38 oficina 337 <http://www.stisas.com.co/> http://www.stisas.com.co

4 3

Ciena SAOS thresholds using incorrect OIDs
by Erik Muller 03 Dec '17

03 Dec '17

We recently added some Ciena 3942s and 3904s to our monitoring, and found that Observium (CE 17.9.8859) is picking up the wrong OID for some sensors. It seems that the same OID was reused for a couple of checks where they should have been the next in sequence, causing optics Tx power and voltage to not be properly checked. The below change syncs the checks with the correct MIB values, and fixed the false alarms it was generating for us. thanks, -e admin@nms:~$ diff -ub /opt/observium/includes/discovery/sensors/wwp-leos-port-xcvr-mib.inc.php.orig /opt/observium/includes/discovery/sensors/wwp-leos-port-xcvr-mib.inc.php --- /opt/observium/includes/discovery/sensors/wwp-leos-port-xcvr-mib.inc.php.orig 2017-02-01 11:31:13.983653739 -0500 +++ /opt/observium/includes/discovery/sensors/wwp-leos-port-xcvr-mib.inc.php 2017-02-01 15:39:05.687844414 -0500 @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ foreach ($oids as $index => $entry) { $entry['descr'] = dbFetchCell("SELECT `ifDescr` FROM `ports` WHERE `device_id` = ? AND `ifName` = ?", array($device['device_id'], $index)) . " Tx power"; - $entry['oid'] = ".1.3.6.1.4.1.6141.2.60.4.1.1.1.1.105." . $index; + $entry['oid'] = ".1.3.6.1.4.1.6141.2.60.4.1.1.1.1.106." . $index; $entry['current'] = $entry['wwpLeosPortXcvrTxDbmPower']; $options = array('limit_high' => $entry['wwpLeosPortXcvrHighTxDbmPwAlarmThreshold'] * $scale, 'limit_low' => $entry['wwpLeosPortXcvrLowTxDbmPwAlarmThreshold'] * $scale, @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ foreach ($oids as $index => $entry) { $entry['descr'] = dbFetchCell("SELECT ifDescr FROM `ports` WHERE `device_id` = ? AND `ifName` = ?", array($device['device_id'], $index)) . " Volts"; - $entry['oid'] = ".1.3.6.1.4.1.6141.2.60.4.1.1.1.1.16.".$index; + $entry['oid'] = ".1.3.6.1.4.1.6141.2.60.4.1.1.1.1.17.".$index; $entry['current'] = $entry['wwpLeosPortXcvrVcc']; $options = array('limit_high' => $entry['wwpLeosPortXcvrHighVccAlarmThreshold'], 'limit_low' => $entry['wwpLeosPortXcvrLowVccAlarmThreshold'],

2 1

Distributed-remote poĺlers (again)
by Edvinas K 30 Nov '17

30 Nov '17

Hello, I would like to know if there any plans or solutions to make Observium run in distributed poller setup ? Thanks

5 9